Intelligent Design
Darwin’s faithful wrestle with promiscuity in hen sparrows
Interesting PBS Series on Quantum Entanglement
Spooky action at a distance.
Evolutionary psychologist Robert Trivers wants to fix you, can’t say why
SETI’s Seth Shostak: “Life is not all that special”
We Held Out as Long as We Could
But we were being overrun with spam by the spambots, and we finally added a captcha verification to our sign-in and comments. We truly value our commenters and hope this is not too much of an inconvenience.
Supersymmetry: In the face of lack of evidence, the unthinkable third alternative is …
Lynn Margulis (March 5, 1938-November 22, 2011)
The tabloids have got the news: Einstein might be wrong
Common ancestry and co-speciation: A question
Physicist David Deutsch says really dumb stuff when outside his field of expertise?
Recently published statistics indicate that the odds are overwhelming that you do not in fact exist
Vid: Greg Radick’s 11/11/11 talk, “Lessons of the Galapagos” – a responsible academic discussion
Survival of the Fittest: It Takes Two to Tango!
A rather comprehensive study of the European vole has concluded that it is hard to know how “fit” genes gain predominance in a population because of what they term “sexual antagonism.” It turns out that when dominant males mate with females, the females that pass on the dominant gene have smaller litter sizes, while the females not passing on the dominant gene have larger litter size. Here’s what one of the authors had to say: “With sexual antagonism such as this, it’s sometimes hard to understand how different genes are maintained in the reproductive process, because if the beneficial effect is much stronger in one sex, one would assume that only the gene with best overall success should be maintained,” Read More ›