Science
2006: Dissent from Darwin is becoming more open among professionals
2007: Darwinist efforts to stifle the ID community are beginning to fail
2008: Lots of people doubt Darwin that you didn’t think would, and are not afraid to say so
2009: The modern (neo-Darwinian) synthesis is – safely – admitted to be fading
2010: Layer on layer of intricacy outstrips Darwinian just-so stories
American election 2012: When science is nuts, anti-science is newly respectable
Your handy free guide to science-based alarmism past and present
Here’s an interesting piece on science-based alarmism, from Pajamas Media: Take the alarm over mercury in fish: in 2004, an Environmental Protection Agency employee warned that 630,000 babies per year were born at risk of brain and nervous system damage due to “unsafe” levels of mercury in their mothers’ blood. Expectant mothers were discouraged from eating fish. Japan consumes a lot of fish, and the supposedly unsafe levels cited by the EPA are exceeded by 74% of women of childbearing age there. Yet there is no evidence that their children are mentally deficient. In fact, only benefits have been reported from high levels of fish consumption, including good brain function and improved intelligence at age four. The alarming forecast of Read More ›