Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

“The Pontifical Academy of Evolutionists”

Categories
Creationism
Evolution
Religion
Science
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here’s a quote from THE CHRISTIAN ORDER going back more than a decade:

The Pontifical Academy of Evolutionists

Despite being widely accepted even at the highest level in the Church, there has never been any authoritative teaching approving of evolution. Hence the reaction of the worldwide media to the Pope’s message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on October 25th 1996. The ambiguous phrase that evolution is “more than just a theory” was greeted with glee by the materialistic press as an official admission of the collapse, under the weight of scientific research, of the Church’s traditional beliefs in Adam and Eve and any literal sense of Genesis.(37) Yet by no stretch of wishful thinking can the Pope’s message, arguably not even written by him personally, be considered a Magisterial teaching, still less an infallible new dogma of faith, overturning previous doctrine.

If John Paul II is unaware of the contemporary crisis in the credibility of evolution, this could be related to the fact that his 80 scientific advisors in the Academy are all evolutionists, including Fr. Stanley Jaki and the atheist cosmologist Stephen Hawking. This bias must severely limit the competence of the Academy to fulfil the stated intentions of Pope Pius IX, on its foundation in 1936, “… who wished to surround himself with a select group of scholars, relying on them to inform the Holy See in complete freedom about developments in scientific research and thereby to assist him in his reflections.”(38) In his 1996 Message, John Paul reminded the Academy that the Magisterium has already made pronouncements on these matters, and cites the encyclical “Humani Generis” in which Pope Pius XII: “considered the doctrine of ‘evolutionism’ a serious hypothesis, worthy of investigation and in-depth study equal to that of the opposing hypothesis.” A comparison with the text shows that the Message paraphrases the encyclical in a subtle but misleading way and omits its explicit warning that the evolution of man must not be treated as certain fact.(39) It is also difficult to believe that “the opposing hypothesis,” which remains unnamed but is presumably Special Creation, can have been given “equal investigation and in-depth study” by the Pontifical Academy if there is not one expert on Creation Science included among its members! A prudent Catholic cannot regard such pronouncements, especially in the contemporary post-Vatican II context, as of sufficient weight to overturn two millenia of Scripture, Tradition and Magisterial teachings.

QUESTIONS: Why are all 80 members of the PAS evolutionists? Is the PAS self-selecting? How much say does the Holy Father have in the selection of members? How many of these members are themselves Catholic? How many are theologically sound (i.e., can say the creeds without smirking)?

Comments
I may be mistaken but it is my understanding that the Catholic Church runs a lot of schools, including institutes of higher learning. It is not in the Church's interest to run afoul of the accrediting agencies, as these are mostly under secular control. The whole PAS affair seems to be about politics and very little science. But then again, I could be wrong.Mapou
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:59 AM
11
11
59
AM
PDT
Huh? Google "From Darwin To Hitler".AmerikanInKananaskis
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:49 AM
11
11
49
AM
PDT
AmerikanInKananaskis
Hitler
= white, catholic and EXPELLED from academiasparc
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:48 AM
11
11
48
AM
PDT
As to the alleged racism of the Catholic hierarchy...
I think I was very clear. The Catholic hierarchy IS NOT racist. But as Dr. Dembski points out, there are probably a lot of non-Catholics and "fake" Catholics (atheists) in the PAS. Seriously, with all the EXPELLED stuff that goes on in academia, would you seriously put it past big science to try to sneak some people into the PAS in order to get the "infallible" leader of the world's largest religious group to promote evolution?
Also, what criteria are you using to justify your assertion that the “Darwinian establishment” is racist?
Hitler. QED.AmerikanInKananaskis
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:41 AM
11
11
41
AM
PDT
The vast majority of scientists worldwide accept evolution. In addition, many on this blog claim that scientists who do not accept evolution are demoted or discriminated against, which should shift the balance even further. Certainly if you were to randomly pick out 80 scientists, it wouldn't really be all that surprising if they all accepted evolution. Conspiracy theories don't seem warranted when this is easily explainable by statistics.DanSLO
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:27 AM
11
11
27
AM
PDT
As to the alleged racism of the Catholic hierarchy, I believe that the record shows that John Paul II appointed more non-white bishops, cardinals, and other officials than all of the other popes put together. Or are you trying to say that African Catholics are necessarily anti-evolutionists by definition? On what basis might one make such a claim?Allen_MacNeill
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:19 AM
11
11
19
AM
PDT
Also, from what I have read about his character, I think that John Paul II would not have hesitated to remove someone from the PAS if he thought their ideas conflicted in any way with Catholic theology. The fact that he did not, and instead turned to them confidently for advice, makes me suspect that the whole premise for this thread is faulty.Allen_MacNeill
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
11:16 AM
11
11
16
AM
PDT
I'm also curious how much of the PAS is non-white. I don't think the Catholic Church is racist, but the Darwinian establishment certainly is. So if the PAS is mostly self-selecting, I would expect to see very few people on the list who aren't white. (Despite the fact that the Catholic Church has huge numbers in Africa.)AmerikanInKananaskis
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
08:30 AM
8
08
30
AM
PDT
I don't want to get into theological matters, but this is the biggest problem with Catholicism, IMO. They have an infallible king who can just tell you the way things are and the way things are supposed to be. That is NOT GOOD for independent thought. To be honest, I don't know how any real American could be Catholic. The whole point of the revolution was to not live under kings and queens anymore. I think Catholics missed the point. I think the answers to the questions are all obvious except for "Why are all 80 members of the PAS evolutionists?" But if I'm not mistaken, this was right around the time that John Paul II apologized to Galileo, so maybe he was just trying to suck up to the "elite".AmerikanInKananaskis
March 20, 2009
March
03
Mar
20
20
2009
08:15 AM
8
08
15
AM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply