Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

10 Reasons Why Atheists Are Delusional

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Atheists/materialists/physicalist/naturalists are delusional. Here are 10 reasons why:

1. They dismiss morality as nothing more than strongly felt subjective preference, but admit they act as if morality is objective in nature.

2. They speak, act and hold others responsible for their behaviors as if we all have some metaphysical capacity to transcend and override the deterministic effects of our body’s physical state and causative processing, yet they deny any such metaphysical capacity (like free will) exists.

3. They deny truth can be determined subjectively while necessarily implying that their arguments and evidences are true and expecting others to subjectively determine that their arguments are true.

4. They deny that what is intelligently designed can be reliably identified when virtually every moment of their waking existence requires precisely that capacity.

5. They deny that some abstract concepts are necessarily true and objectively binding on our existence (such as the fundamental principles of math, logic and morality) yet reference them (directly or indirectly) as if they are exactly that.

6. They deny humans are anything other than entirely creatures of nature, yet insist that what humans do is somehow a threat to nature or some supposed natural balance.

7. They insist humans are categorically the same as any other animals, but then decry it when humans treat other humans the same way other animals treat their own kind (alpha male brutality, violence, etc), as if humans have some sort of obligation to “transcend” their “animal” nature.

8. They insist that physical facts are the only meaningful truths that exist, but then want to use force of law to protect subjective concepts that contradict physical facts, like “transgenderism”.

9. They insist spiritual laws that transcend the physical do not exist, but then insist that all humans are equal, when they factually, obviously are not equals at all – either physically or intellectually.

10. They pursue social systems that attempt to force the concept of equality on everyone as if they expect that through ignoring the physical realty of human inequality they can build a sound social system, which would be comparable to ignoring the inequality of building materials and insisting that they all be treated as equal when building a skyscraper.

Comments
zeroseven
It’s amazing how all those hundreds of millions of cognitively deficient, delusional atheists around the world seem to be able to live such successful and fulfilled lives. I guess they are the type of delusions and cognitive dissonances that don’t have any effect on the ability to live successful lives.
It isn't amazing at all. Quite often, it's the success the breeds the atheism rather than the other way around. The more self-sufficient the proud man perceives himself to be, the greater is his distance from God. "Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."----Jesus ChristStephenB
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
03:23 PM
3
03
23
PM
PDT
HeKS What you are describing is a profound mental disorder. At the very least a serious personality disorder. I am quite familiar with the mental health profession and community. I know people who suffer from the kind of delusions you describe (for example gay people who have not come out of the closet). Generally there are further mental health consequences to living a life like that. I look around the country I live in where religion has retreated to the very fringes of public life and I don't see a society suffering from the problems I would expect to see if what you say is true. Quite the opposite.zeroseven
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
03:01 PM
3
03
01
PM
PDT
zeroseven
I guess they are the type of delusions and cognitive dissonances that don’t have any effect on the ability to live successful lives
Basically, yeah. Why? Because they don't actually live like their delusions are true. They give lip service to the delusions and defend them with generally poor arguments. They claim that it is everyone else who is delusional for thinking differently. They often claim themselves to be the intellectual elite for holding to these delusions. But when their shift is over they go home and live their lives in a way that suggests they know just as well as everyone else these delusions are absurd.HeKS
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
02:48 PM
2
02
48
PM
PDT
It's amazing how all those hundreds of millions of cognitively deficient, delusional atheists around the world seem to be able to live such successful and fulfilled lives. I guess they are the type of delusions and cognitive dissonances that don't have any effect on the ability to live successful lives.zeroseven
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
02:41 PM
2
02
41
PM
PDT
Barry @14
HeKS @ 13. I did not think so. K-S’s writing style reminded me of a teenager playing at village atheist.
That's precisely what made me think it might be Keith S :) I thought it might be him before I looked up and saw the 'K-S' name.HeKS
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
01:41 PM
1
01
41
PM
PDT
I will tell you what's my favorite thing in the world.... Atheists trying to demonstrate that morality evolved from non morality... Non morality of course is not reducible to atoms or any type of material, not that it "matters" to them, (excuse the pun). They deny that there is anything more than atoms and yet..... Morality evolved from non morality.... How confused must such a mind be?Andre
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
12:45 PM
12
12
45
PM
PDT
Great response K-S@10 You provide great support for WJM's thesis. Thanks for providing the proof from the field.JDH
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
12:32 PM
12
12
32
PM
PDT
And K-S telling us exactly how he feels as if any of it even matters in a materialist world. He showed you WJM.Andre
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
12:32 PM
12
12
32
PM
PDT
WJM as to "Why Atheists Are Delusional": Although your post is excellent as usual for pointing out the sheer insanity of the atheistic mindset, it is interesting to point out that this 'delusional' aspect of the atheistic mindset happens at a more foundational, shall we say, a more 'scientific' level:
Delusional [dih-loo-zhuh-nl] adjective 1. having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions:
Although reliable ‘observation’ of reality is a necessary cornerstone of the scientific method itself,,,
Steps of the Scientific Method Observation/Research Hypothesis Prediction Experimentation Conclusion http://www.sciencemadesimple.com/scientific_method.html
,,, Although reliable ‘observation’ of reality is a necessary cornerstone of the scientific method, materialism undermines this cornerstone. Given materialistic/atheistic premises, not only are our interpretations of reality held to be somewhat flawed, but even our perceptions/observations of reality itself held to be untrustworthy and thus ‘illusory’ given the materialistic premises of atheism.
Donald Hoffman: Do we see reality as it is? – Video – 9:59 minute mark Quote: “fitness does depend on reality as it is, yes.,,, Fitness is not the same thing as reality as it is, and it is fitness, and not reality as it is, that figures centrally in the equations of evolution. So, in my lab, we have run hundreds of thousands of evolutionary game simulations with lots of different randomly chosen worlds and organisms that compete for resources in those worlds. Some of the organisms see all of the reality. Others see just part of the reality. And some see none of the reality. Only fitness. Who wins? Well I hate to break it to you but perception of reality goes extinct. In almost every simulation, organisms that see none of reality, but are just tuned to fitness, drive to extinction that perceive reality as it is. So the bottom line is, evolution does not favor veridical, or accurate perceptions. Those (accurate) perceptions of reality go extinct. Now this is a bit stunning. How can it be that not seeing the world accurately gives us a survival advantage?” https://youtu.be/oYp5XuGYqqY?t=601 and Why Atheism is Nonsense Pt.5 – “Naturalism is a Self-defeating Idea”video Excerpt: “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not concerned with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Richard Dawkins – quoted from “The God Delusion” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff-5rsrDRGM
Thus, given atheistic premises, the belief that our observations of reality are fairly reliable, which is a necessary cornerstone of the science method itself, is itself a delusion. Needless to say, it would be hard to find a more unscientific worldview than one that undermines the scientific method itself! Interestingly, completely contrary to that materialistic premise, conscious observation of reality, far from being illusory, is experimentally found to be far more integral to reality, i.e. far more reliable, than materialism/atheism would have ever predicted.
New Mind-blowing Experiment Confirms That Reality Doesn’t Exist If You Are Not Looking at It – June 3, 2015 Excerpt: The results of the Australian scientists’ experiment, which were published in the journal Nature Physics, show that this choice is determined by the way the object is measured, which is in accordance with what quantum theory predicts. “It proves that measurement is everything. At the quantum level, reality does not exist if you are not looking at it,” said lead researcher Dr. Andrew Truscott in a press release.,,, “The atoms did not travel from A to B. It was only when they were measured at the end of the journey that their wave-like or particle-like behavior was brought into existence,” he said. Thus, this experiment adds to the validity of the quantum theory and provides new evidence to the idea that reality doesn’t exist without an observer. http://themindunleashed.org/2015/06/new-mind-blowing-experiment-confirms-that-reality-doesnt-exist-if-you-are-not-looking-at-it.html
Apparently science itself could care less if atheists think that their observations of reality are illusory. Moreover, given the materialistic/atheistic premises of Darwinian evolution, not only are our observations of reality itself held to be illusory, but even our sense of self, i.e. the belief that we really exist as real persons, which is the most sure thing we can know about reality, becomes illusory too. In what I consider to be a shining example of poetic justice, in their claim that God is not really a real person but is merely an illusion, the naturalist also ends up claiming that he himself is not really a real person but is merely an illusion.,,,
“that “You”, your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behaviour of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules. As Lewis Carroll’s Alice might have phrased: “You’re nothing but a pack of neurons.” This hypothesis is so alien to the ideas of most people today that it can truly be called astonishing.” Francis Crick – “The Astonishing Hypothesis” 1994 “We have so much confidence in our materialist assumptions (which are assumptions, not facts) that something like free will is denied in principle. Maybe it doesn’t exist, but I don’t really know that. Either way, it doesn’t matter because if free will and consciousness are just an illusion, they are the most seamless illusions ever created. Film maker James Cameron wishes he had special effects that good.” Matthew D. Lieberman – neuroscientist – materialist – UCLA professor The Confidence of Jerry Coyne – Ross Douthat – January 6, 2014 Excerpt: But then halfway through this peroration, we have as an aside the confession (by Coyne) that yes, okay, it’s quite possible given materialist premises that “our sense of self is a neuronal illusion.” At which point the entire edifice suddenly looks terribly wobbly — because who, exactly, is doing all of this forging and shaping and purpose-creating if Jerry Coyne, as I understand him (and I assume he understands himself) quite possibly does not actually exist at all? The theme of his argument is the crucial importance of human agency under eliminative materialism, but if under materialist premises the actual agent is quite possibly a fiction, then who exactly is this I who “reads” and “learns” and “teaches,” and why in the universe’s name should my illusory self believe Coyne’s bold proclamation that his illusory self’s purposes are somehow “real” and worthy of devotion and pursuit? (Let alone that they’re morally significant: But more on that below.) Prometheus cannot be at once unbound and unreal; the human will cannot be simultaneously triumphant and imaginary. Per NY Times Atheistic Materialism – Does Richard Dawkins Exist? – video 37:51 minute mark Quote: “You can spout a philosophy that says scientific materialism, but there aren’t any scientific materialists to pronounce it.,,, That’s why I think they find it kind of embarrassing to talk that way. Nobody wants to stand up there and say, “You know, I’m not really here”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCnzq2yTCg&t=37m51s At the 23:33 minute mark of the following video, Richard Dawkins agrees with materialistic philosophers who say that: “consciousness is an illusion” A few minutes later Rowan Williams asks Dawkins ”If consciousness is an illusion… what isn’t?”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWN4cfh1Fac&t=22m57s
Thus, given materialistic premises, people become illusions whose observations of reality are illusory. And why in blue blazes should anyone believe what illusions having illusions say about reality? Thus, basically, without God, everything within the atheistic/naturalistic worldview, (i.e. sense of self. observation of reality, even reality itself i.e. Boltzmann Brains), collapses into self refuting, unrestrained, flights of fantasies and imagination. i.e. becomes delusional Verse, Video and Music:
2 Corinthians 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
bornagain77
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
12:09 PM
12
12
09
PM
PDT
HeKS @ 13. I did not think so. K-S's writing style reminded me of a teenager playing at village atheist. I am not kidding when I said my grandchildren's "is not; is too" came to mind when reading his post. But you may be right.Barry Arrington
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
11:48 AM
11
11
48
AM
PDT
Are we sure K-S is not simply keith s?HeKS
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
11:34 AM
11
11
34
AM
PDT
K-S @ 10: 1. Here’s a clue (you should write this down). Facile assertions and question begging do not add up to an argument. 2. That materialist atheism entails no free will has been widely demonstrated countless times. Your mere assertion that atheism is compatible with free will does not establish the matter. Here’s another clue (you should write this down too): Mere denial is not an argument. If you think atheism and libertarian free will are compatible, you should demonstrate why you think that. As an added bonus, if you succeed you will instantly become the most famous philosopher in the world for having resolved a millennia-old philosophical conundrum. 3. Mere denial is not an argument. 4. You fail to even address WJM’s assertion. Here’s another clue (write this down): Changing the subject is not an argument. 5. “I wonder which atheists you’re referencing?” You are new to this site, so I will give you a break. But atheists on these pages commonly argue just as WJM says. Another clue: Your ignorance is not an argument. 6. Another clue: Your failure to understand WJM’s argument and respond to it in any meaningful way is not an argument. 7. “Atheists do not believe that we are the same as every other animal.” WJM asserts that atheists do not believe humans are different in “essence” from animals. You respond by asserting that atheists most certainly do believe that humans are different in “degree” from other animals. I will leave it to you to figure out why your rebuttal obviously fails. 8. “I’ve never heard an atheist say that ‘physical facts are the only meaningful truth that exists” You have got to be kidding me. You must not get out much. Again, your personal ignorance is not an argument. 9. The formal logically fallacy that you have committed here is called “tu quoque.” Look it up. 10. “So you’re saying we should not be treating people equally?” Nope, WJM never said that. I have no idea why you would suggest he did. WJM is saying that various atheist utopian social movements (e.g. Marxisim, Progressivism), are doomed to fail because they are based on the flawed premise that humans should be equal materially as opposed to morally. The premise is flawed, because human inequality in matters of ability, intelligence, and even good fortune (i.e., some people get lucky) is obvious, and results in unequal outcomes. Any attempt to address the unequal outcomes that result from unequal ability, necessarily devolves into authoritarianism to one degree of another. That is why when you scratch a progressive you will see a fascist underneath. WJM is merely pointing to the tension between “equality of outcome” and “liberty” (which tension atheist social movements ignore). If you are unfamiliar with the concept you should study it. K-S, I give your attempted rebuttal a D-. Mostly you remind me of my three year-old granddaughter arguing with my five year-old grandson. “Is not; is too; is not; is too; is not; is too.” If I were you and I failed so miserably in an attempted defense of my worldview, I would reexamine that worldview. I doubt that you will.Barry Arrington
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
11:03 AM
11
11
03
AM
PDT
Great post WJM. Sometimes I wish I could make myself be a materialist. Life would be so much easier if I knew for certain that when I use the word "moral," I mean nothing more than "that which I prefer." I could do anything I wanted if I were willing to suppress my empathy. And why not suppress my empathy? It does no good to say I shouldn't suppress my empathy because that would not be very empathetic. It would be a simple matter of "who's the boss," my unfettered will to power or the chemicals in my brain that I know are trying to trick me into believing that such a thing as "right" or "wrong" exists in order to force me to behave in a certain way. Yup, being a materialist would be nice. But as Phil Johnson famously said, I just can't handle the magnitude of the necessary faith commitments, not to mention the massive cognitive dissonance that would ensue if I tried to keep all of those mutually exclusive ideas juxtaposed in my head at the same time. WJM, of course atheists are delusional. Deluding oneself is the only way a sane person could pull it off.Barry Arrington
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
10:31 AM
10
10
31
AM
PDT
1. When people live in proximity to one another and share resources, moral codes naturally develop. There is no need to appeal to a supernatural entity to understand why we shouldn't steal from our neighbor, or why we should be faithful to our spouse. And why couldn't a supernatural deity just as easily command us to steal and to cheat and pronounce those actions as being moral? There's nothing delusional about being skeptical of some sort of objective, cosmic morality. 2. The notion of free will is an ongoing philosophical conversation that some have, both theistic and atheistic. This is not part and parcel with atheism. But if it is a conversation you think represents a true problem, I fail to see how 'God gave us free will,' would be a meaningful response. How would you ever know? You're just simply asserting it to be true. 3. This is again a philosophical conversation which both theists and atheists can have. It is not a part of merely being an atheist. Merely deferring to a supernatural entity does not get you out from under the philosophical conundrum which might arise if one is truly concerned about how anything can be objectively known. You're just simply asserting that it is so. Atheists, in general, seem to be more open to having these sorts of philosophical exercises, and doing so should be encouraged, not lazily labeled as delusional. 4. 'Intelligent design' refers to the beliefs of a very specific subset of theists. Evolution vs. intelligent design is not an atheism/theism issue. It is dishonest to pretend that it is. 5. Most atheists that I know of would say that logic and math are indeed fundamentally true. I wonder which atheists you're referencing? It seems to be theists who believe that 'logic' is a thing which was merely created by a supernatural being a long time ago, which seems to me to make it much more subjective in nature. 6. Yes, humans with our intelligence and technology have the capacity to throw off the natural balance of things, like fragile ecosystems. Not sure how you think that relates to atheism in any way. 7. Atheists do not believe that we are the same as every other animal. On the contrary, we are the most advanced animal in existence, the very top of the evolutionary tree. We have the ability to think about the future in ways that other animals can not. Guess what? Many theists believe this, too. You once again seem to be conflating atheism with a belief in evolution, when the truth is that most theists in the world also accept evolution. 8. 'Transgenderism' is not an atheist issue. Many proponents of transgender issues are theists of all different religions, and I'm sure if you took a poll of atheists in the world, you would find a great number of differing opinions on the issue. I've never heard an atheist say that 'physical facts are the only meaningful truth that exists,' and I suspect you just made this up. 9. Really? All atheists insist that all people are equal? The idea is that in a society, we are all better off by treating each other equally. Guess what? Many theists throughout history have also insisted that all people are NOT equal. Again, this is not an atheist issue. I want to live in a world in which all people are treated fairly, this is an ideal towards which to strive. It has nothing to do with any so-called spiritual laws. Which spiritual laws are you even referring to? 10. So you're saying we should not be treating people equally? How so? And what's the physical reality of human inequality? Doesn't sound like a world I would want to live in. If you're referring to something like allowing women to play with men on professional football teams, please show me the atheists who are in support of that and maybe I'll listen to you, but would then quickly point out that people who believe in a supernatural being could just as easily be in support of that as well.K-S
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
10:29 AM
10
10
29
AM
PDT
Well done! Also, good additions Andre@7.Truth Will Set You Free
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
10:18 AM
10
10
18
AM
PDT
Excellent post and spot on. Of course, most atheists would claim that all 10 of these observations have been utterly refuted, eviscerated, destroyed, demolished (pick your verb)many, many times over. But try finding all that demolition!! It always amuses me when atheists get morally indignant over some perceived wrong committed against them as if there is some actual, objective moral obligation that's been violated. Witness the recent brouhaha over Larry Taunton's recent book The Faith of Christopher Hitchens. Atheists have come unglued over the mere suggestion that Hitch may have entertained questions about his atheism as he faced his demise. Taunton has been subjected to every kind of vitriol imaginable in tweets, posts and blogs. See this post from Jerry Coyne's blog. (and check out Krauss's article linked there...an editorial in the NYT). Or check out the video in this post on Coyne's site as well. These atheists are all so morally indignant over Taunton as if he violated some objective, higher moral principle! I think Eric Metaxas got it exactly right in asking Are Atheists Afraid of God?DonaldM
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
09:36 AM
9
09
36
AM
PDT
Can I add? 12. They use reason to deny that reason exist. 13. They believe that mud not not only made itself but magically became alive.Andre
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
09:02 AM
9
09
02
AM
PDT
Brilliant post, thanks for sharing guys. I am amazed that atheists are so obsessed with social issues (witness the recent SJW fest aka "reason rally"), they are without doubt the Puritans of our age, and what an irony.Polanyi
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
08:53 AM
8
08
53
AM
PDT
Atheist here. Just pointing that not all of these apply to all atheists (at least #2, #4, #8, in my case, for example). Not that the OP implies such, of course.daveS
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
07:51 AM
7
07
51
AM
PDT
WJM - Excellent! Your argument goes both deep and wide. Even one of these observations constitutes a checkmate to atheism, but taken together they dramatize the mindless nature of the materialist's world view.StephenB
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
07:46 AM
7
07
46
AM
PDT
WJM, I hear you. Did you crank up the coffee for the morning? KF kairosfocus
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
07:46 AM
7
07
46
AM
PDT
Hi William J. Murray, What a brilliant post! It perfectly nails the delusion of atheism. Thanks for putting it up. vjtorley
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
07:29 AM
7
07
29
AM
PDT
Points to ponder. kairosfocus
June 8, 2016
June
06
Jun
8
08
2016
07:20 AM
7
07
20
AM
PDT
1 5 6 7

Leave a Reply