Rockefeller University researchers
found that part of a DNA repair protein known as 53BP1 fits over the phosphorylated part of H2AX “like a glove,” says Kleiner. This interaction helps bring 53BP1 to the site of DNA damage, where it mediates the repair of double-stranded breaks in DNA by encouraging the repair machinery to glue the two ends back together.
New findings shed light on fundamental process of DNA repair
What are the prospects of a DNA self replicating entity surviving with rapid cumulative DNA mutations until it assembles the DNA repair mechanism – by random stochastic processes?
Paper: Chemical proteomics reveals a γH2AX-53BP1 interaction in the DNA damage response Ralph E Kleiner et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2015) 07 September 2015 doi:10.1038/nchembio.1908
For context, see John C. Sanford’s “Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome.”
For such insightful details elegantly explained, see Dr. Howard Glicksman’s Exercise Your Wonder: Beyond Irreducible Complexity. e.g.,
CAUTION: ENZYMES AT WORK: Part III: Anti-Clotting
What are the prospects of a DNA self replicating entity surviving with rapid cumulative DNA mutations until it assembles the DNA repair mechanism – by random stochastic processes?
Zero. You may as well believe in miracles.
The DNA repair mechanism defeats Darwinian evolution because it repairs the very mutations that the evotards need for their brain-dead theory.
But if you get rid of the DNA repair mechanism, the organism dies. Darwinism: stuck between stupidity and imbecility.
There has been a spate of gun shots on vehicles just outside of Phoenix Az recently. The media have been calling them “random shootings”. They must mean “random” in the Darwinian sense – guided and purposeful. Darwinism runs deep:(
Semi-on-topic:
How to picture DNA? Talbott’s writings helped me a lot:
// Follow-up #4
What is it about the word, ‘random’ you people don’t understand, eh? Come on! Out with it!
Oh…. it’s exemplified in the article above to anyone with an IQ in double figures is it? I see….
Well, we believe in ‘meaning horizons’, as well as event-horizons. There are circumstances when the meanings of words no longer … errrr… mean what they’re meant to.
Box at 4 & 5 per Talbott:
Top 10 Greatest In Your Face Dunks of All Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epoqTYDzsDU
🙂
BA77 #7,
Oh yeah! 🙂
Oh Yeah! 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU0Ypufo6BM
This is, of course, a show stopper for the Darwin parade.
But for believers, there is no such thing as a show stopper. Their faith is able to move any mountain necessary.
Since a DNA repair mechanism exists, it’s obvious it had to have evolved. It’s existence is proof! I mean, that’s the only “scientific” answer there is, right?
Materialist “reasoning”! lol.
And, of course, it is us ‘creationist fanatics’ who are anti-science and hinder the efforts of all real scientists by appealing to some unseen supernatural entity to explain the problem. If we just wait another 1,000 years, certainly “SCIENCE” will figure it out. (This allows them to believe whatever they want without being held accountable for their faith. It allows them to have faith while at the same time criticizing us for faith because their faith is in blind purposeless natural processes. This qualifies their faith as “scientific” and therefore all is well.
So, basically, using this approach, there is NO EVIDENCE that will ever convince these adherents to the tenets of Materialism. The problems, no matter how insurmountable they may seem now are irrelevant. Some day, we will figure it out they hope. It’s an ingenious way to dismiss any & all evidence that challenges their beliefs.
A DNA self repair mechanism? Ho hum! So what! Who cares! No big deal! old news! What’s all the fuss about? Some day we’ll figure it out.
What is the perfect rebuttal to Evolution: DNA, even before these findings. Only a religious fanatic could claim that DNA was not designed. It is even more true now.
But can’t the deity “DEEP TIME” explain this?
But can’t the Diety “DEEP TIME”explain all this?
Ms. O’Leary,
Semi-off topic.
My church recently had a biologist publish a blog post on why he thinks evolution does not contradict the bible and he criticized intelligent design. He basically assumed irreducible complexity is the only idea ID has and refuted it by saying that sometimes engineers use evolutionary ideas for making new things.
I had a lot of comments that I could have made to him, but I decided to do a quick search online to see if there was any new stuff by Michael Behe. And it seems like he has kind of taken a hiatus from speaking, debating and blogging. Do you know what is up with him? Can we expect any more books or articles on irreducible complexity or the Edge of Evolution?
thanks,