Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Astrophysicist: Photons with mass wouldn’t solve the dark matter puzzle

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
3-D impression of dark matter via Hubble

He examines the possibilities and decides that photons probably do not really have mass. But even if they did, that wouldn’t help much with the puzzle that we need dark matter but can’t find it:

Even if the photon had mass, and was somehow able to explain the motions of all stars in a galaxy, not just the massive ones, it wouldn’t be able to explain the host of other observations (for example, how could a new electromagnetic force explain the gravitational bending of light around a galaxy cluster? It’s not a rhetorical question – it can’t). In other words, even in a cosmos filled with massive photons, we’d still need dark matter too. Paul M. Sutter, “Massive Photons Could Explain Dark Matter, But Don’t” at Universe Today

If we can’t even find dark matter, why are some speculating on infinities of infinities of universes?

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Before you go: Discover: Even the best dark matter theories are crumbling

Researcher: The search for dark matter has become a “quagmire of confirmation bias” So many research areas in science today are hitting hard barriers that it is reasonable to think that we are missing something.

Physicists devise test to find out if dark matter really exists

Largest particle detector draws a blank on dark matter

What if dark matter just doesn’t stick to the rules?

A proposed dark matter solution makes gravity an illusion

and

Proposed dark matter solution: “Gravity is not a fundamental governance of our universe, but a reaction to the makeup of a given environment.”

Comments
Photons with mass? That would hurt. It would be like an atomic sand-blasterET
March 15, 2019
March
03
Mar
15
15
2019
05:25 PM
5
05
25
PM
PDT
If SPIRAL cosmological redshift hypothesis and model we would not predict / require the missing dark matter (and dark energy) so safe to assume they do not exist. Yet we do predict the cosmological redshift and the increase of that CR w/ distance! unlike SCM-LCDM where they merely react to the CR w/ the lame explanation of a resumption of cosmic expansion after the cosmic inflation epoch. If SPIRAL it is due to the expansion during that epoch.Pearlman
March 14, 2019
March
03
Mar
14
14
2019
06:36 PM
6
06
36
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply