That finding isn’t surprising in principle but the researchers pinned down specific areas of greater connectivity in the human brain:
In a study of brain scans from 50 humans and 29 chimpanzees, researchers discovered an interesting difference: The connections between language areas in the human brain are much larger than previously thought and quite different from those of the chimpanzee brain. That’s, of course, consistent with the relative complexity of human thought and language but the question had not really been examined before with a focus on one specific area.
The researchers were interested in a nerve tract that connects the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, the arcuate fasciculus
Chimpanzee brain connectivity seems to involve mainly the temporal lobe but in humans there is a connection towards the frontal and parietal lobes via the arcuate fasciculus.
News, “Human brain has many more language connections than chimp brain” at Mind Matters News (July 6, 2022)
Takehome: Among the many differences between the human brain and other animal brains is the role of the arcuate fasciculus that connects lobes of the brain. If we are really 99 percent chimpanzee, as some claim, it doesn’t appear to be showing up in the brain.
In recent years, researchers have discovered a number of other unique features of the human brain:
● Researchers: Humans are prewired to recognize words. Contrary to what psychologists had supposed, the ability to seek meaning is built in, not taught. Meaning is the “superpower” that wise scientists refrain from trying to “explain,” as if they controlled it.
● Human neurons and the human brain are much more efficient than chimpanzee ones. What was formerly thought to be “junk DNA” differs between humans and chimpanzees and plays a role in brain development. Researchers did not expect to find that human neurons have fewer — not more — ion channels than eight other mammal species do.
● Another new communications network has been discovered in the human brain. Our brains are smarter than we thought. Oscillations of over 100 Hertz synchronize across several brain regions. That may help us understand brain diseases better.
● The human brain has neural networks that are not found in lab mice. They are complex special networks whose purpose is silencing other neurons. Researchers theorize that these interneuron networks help us focus on complex tasks where we must keep many different factors in play.
As we’ve said before, there is a lot to study in the human brain. It is the most complex thing that we know of in the universe yet it has shrunk over the last 40,000 years, which have seen many technical advances. Its structure is similar to that of the universe. We will probably be studying it for a while
You may also wish to read: Your mind vs. your brain: Ten things to know
“We will probably be studying it for a while”
As the song goes, We’ve only just begun.
We know why this is so.
Humans have massive number or epigenetic processes/molecules not found in any other species. A high percentage affect the expression of neural cells which is why human brains are more highly developed than other species.
So this is not new. The question is why is this not known/recognized in such a topic.
Can someone point to where ID predicted we would find this?
Another irrelevant comment by an anti ID person.
An ID scientist did write up all the differences between humans and other species in terms of neural development. I didn’t see anyone else do it. Maybe they did.
But is that ID? No, it’s basic science to review the already published research and suggest likely causes for the differences between one species/outcome vs another.
But here is a prediction: few if any anti ID person will provide a logical answer to a question that supports the ID position. Part of that prediction is that the anti ID will ignore or disappear from commenting on anything logic and evidence based.
Connections? Prewired?
So, information clearly requires a physical substrate.
As if we needed more evidence.
Sev
These are all ID-friendly findings.
How is that conclusion made?
Information is generally in the specific arrangement of physical entities. But what determines if a certain arrangement of entities has meaning or doesn’t?
Is it also physical? Could be. I don’t know.
I haven’t followed the recent discussion on information to know what others have said about consciousness.