Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Discovery Commissions Zogby Poll — Design Trumps Darwin

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

[[Discovery Press Release:]]

In Darwin Anniversary Year, New Zogby Poll Reveals Majority Support for Intelligent Design — Doubts about Darwin Continue to Mount

Seattle – Just a few months before the 150th anniversary of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, a newly released Zogby poll shows that the American public overwhelmingly rejects Darwinian theory in favor of intelligent design. When asked if life developed “through an unguided process of random mutations and natural selection,” a standard definition of Darwinism, only 33 percent of respondents said they agreed with the statement. But 52 percent agreed that “the development of life was guided by intelligent design.”

“In the Year of Darwin, these figures must represent a terrible disappointment to Darwinian advocates,” commented Stephen C. Meyer, Ph.D., director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute, which commissioned the poll. “Darwin’s greatest accomplishment was supposed to be the refutation of intelligent design, yet more than a century later the public has grown increasingly disenchanted with Darwin’s claims.”

Dr. Meyer is the author of a new book from HarperOne, Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. He suggested the polling data may reflect a growing awareness of recent scientific developments, documented in his book. As word seeps out from the scientific community, confidence in Darwinism has begun to perceptibly erode:

“It’s only in the past decade that the information age has finally come to biology. We now know that biology at its root is digital code. Having advanced to this level of digital technology ourselves, in computer science, we can at last begin to appreciate what is going on inside the cell: the nested coding, digital processing, distributive retrieval and storage systems, the whole operating system in the genome. The cell is doing the same thing a computer’s operating system does, but with far, far greater efficiency.”

Dr. Meyer said it was no coincidence that the public remained fixed in its skepticism of standard evolutionary theories as scientists learned more about the enigma of DNA and its origins: “Undirected evolutionary processes cannot explain what science is revealing. Intelligent design can. Americans are catching onto this.”

Zogby International conducted the omnibus telephone survey of 1,053 likely voters earlier this year, which marks the 200th anniversary of Darwin’s birth as well as the anniversary of the publication of Origin of Species. The margin of error for the poll is +/- 3.1 percentage points.

Comments
Indeed, the Gallup organization has been polling the American public on precisely these same questions since 1982. In those polls, "naturalistic evolution" has barely risen above 10% (from 9% in 1982 to 14% in 2006; see http://www.gallup.com/poll/108226/Republicans-Democrats-Differ-Creationism.aspx ). Ergo, if the data obtained in the Discovery poll are reliable, there has clearly been a dramatic increase in the acceptance of the "naturalistic" theory of evolution in America over the past 17 years. Whether this is due to the recent publicity around the Darwin Bicentennial or a general increase in the overall quality of American science education is not clear, but it certainly gives me considerable hope that the trend toward increasing acceptance of the scientific theory of evolution will continue.Allen_MacNeill
June 30, 2009
June
06
Jun
30
30
2009
08:25 PM
8
08
25
PM
PDT
Mr. Nakashima says: How does this compare with previous poll questions on similar subjects? 33% for naturalistic evolution is the highest I've ever seen for U.S. citizens. It usually comes out around 9 to 13% when theistic guided evolution is included as an option. Stephen Meyer needs to make comparisons to other polls, as you imply.iconofid
June 30, 2009
June
06
Jun
30
30
2009
07:53 PM
7
07
53
PM
PDT
Nakashima, such decreasing support for ID and increasing support for the ToE over time is a powerful argument for teaching ID now: Better get to it before the Darwinian Establishment(TM) pushes the ID numbers below 50%!David Kellogg
June 30, 2009
June
06
Jun
30
30
2009
07:36 PM
7
07
36
PM
PDT
I am glad to see that so many scientists, when polled, are using intelligent design to formulate hypothesis and then go out and test them. Surely this is the true test of the gathering momentum shift towards ID and away the failed theories of Darwin.90DegreeAngel
June 30, 2009
June
06
Jun
30
30
2009
07:32 PM
7
07
32
PM
PDT
When asked if life developed “through an unguided process of random mutations and natural selection,” a standard definition of Darwinism, only 33 percent of respondents said they agreed with the statement. But 52 percent agreed that “the development of life was guided by intelligent design.” How does this compare with previous poll questions on similar subjects? From 2006: The Zogby poll reportedly showed 69 percent of Americans support the presentation of Intelligent Design, with 21 percent believing only Darwin's theory of evolution should be part of a high school's curriculum. From 2001: 1. Which of the following two statements comes closest to your own opinion? A: Biology teachers should teach only Darwin’s theory of evolution and the scientific evidence that supports it. 15% B: Biology teachers should teach Darwin’s theory of evolution, but also the scientific evidence against it. 71% Neither/Not sure 14% I think Dr Meyer is right. Likely voters in the US are catching on, and their support is perceptibly eroding.Nakashima
June 30, 2009
June
06
Jun
30
30
2009
07:19 PM
7
07
19
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply