Cosmology Intelligent Design Physics

Do some particles defy the universe’s push for disorder?

Spread the love
Rb5.JPG
rubidium/Dnn87 (CC BY 3.0)

That’s an apparent implication of a recent experiment. Generally, left to itself, “a system strives toward equilibrium with its environment” or, in plain terms, “things always go downhill.” They spoil, they crumble, they disintegrate. Sandcastles become sand. Except:

It’s common and intuitive, and precisely what a team of physicists expected to see when they lined up 51 rubidium atoms in a row, holding them in place with lasers. The atoms started in an orderly pattern, alternating between the lowest-energy “ground” state and an excited energy state. The researchers assumed the system would quickly thermalize: The pattern of ground and excited states would settle almost immediately into a jumbled sequence.

And at first, the pattern did jumble. But then, shockingly, it reverted to the original alternating sequence. After some more mixing, it returned yet again to that initial configuration. Back and forth it went, oscillating a few times in under a microsecond — long after it should have thermalized.

It was as if you dropped an ice cube in hot water and it didn’t just melt away, said Mikhail Lukin, a physicist at Harvard University and a leader of the group. “What you see is the ice melts and crystallizes, melts and crystallizes,” he said. “It’s something really unusual.” Marcus Woo, “Quantum Machine Appears to Defy Universe’s Push for Disorder” at Quanta

As Woo goes on to explain, physicists call this “quantum many-body scarring,” with one idea being that the atoms “remember” a past state and return to it, though just how they remember is unclear The work was being done as part of a push for quantum computing.

“There is some beautiful structure that somehow coexists with a totally random environment,” Papić said. “What kind of physics allows this to happen? This is a kind of deep and profound question that runs through many areas of physics, and I think this is another incarnation.” Marcus Woo, “Quantum Machine Appears to Defy Universe’s Push for Disorder” at Quanta

Won’t argue.

Note: rubidium

Paper.  (paywall)

See also: Whether Or Not Man Has Free Will, Quantum Mechanics Means That Nature Does

If quantum mechanics were a researcher, she’d be fired

Quantum Mechanics: Pushing The “Free-Will Loophole” Back To 7.8 Billion Years Ago

At Nature: For Now, “Uncertainty Seems The Wisest Position” On The Implications Of Quantum Mechanics

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Quantum physicist David Bohm on why there cannot be a Theory of Everything

Researchers clearly observe quantum effects in photosynthesis

Inspiring Philosophy on quantum mechanics and the death of materialism

and

Is the search for meaning in quantum physics a form of religion?

3 Replies to “Do some particles defy the universe’s push for disorder?

  1. 1
    AaronS1978 says:

    Doesn’t this experiment completely validate that’s a Roger Penrose assumption about a quantum soul and the consciousness living on forever and her universe

  2. 2
    AaronS1978 says:

    Doesn’t this experiment completely validate that’s a Roger Penrose assumption about a quantum soul and the consciousness living on forever and our universe

  3. 3
    Axel says:

    I was going to say that I don’t see why science should be any different from other spheres of knowledge, in terms of the perversity of some of its putative experts, in refusing to accept patently-incontrovertible empirical evidence, even when it involves paradoxes, such as seem to be increasingly proliferating, at both the quantum and astrophysical levels. But we are alway talking about the religious nature of the fervently-combative incredulity of the A/Mats, aren’t we ? I think it’s a version of our own Christian ‘odium theologicum’.

    Why should our A/Mats be any smarter than the religious leaders of Christ’s day, who paid the guards of Jesus’ tomb to spin a ‘cock and bull story’ about how Jesus’ body had been ‘spirited’ away by his followers. Can’t remember the details.

    This, mind you, bearing in mind that they had seen hm raise the body of Lazarus to life again, not long before, when he had already been dead for four days and his body was, by then, actually putrifying and ‘humming’. Who but a sovereign, omnipotent god could have performed such a miracle. Some of them had also witnessed his curing the lad who had been born blind.

    Parenthetically, it tickles me to bits to read that the lad had eventually lost his temper and decided to ‘wind up’ his Pharisee interrogators, by pointing out to them that only a man very close to God could have performed such a miracle, unheard of since the beginning of the world ! And why they wanted to know who he was … did they want to become disciples of his as well ?!?

    WHAT ? WHAT ? Are you trying to teach us rabbis ?! That sort of thing. Really brings it to life for me. We tend to concentrate perhaps a little too much on Jesus’ divinity, at the expense, I believe, of his humanity and of the profoundly engaging verisimilitude of the Gospel accounts.

Leave a Reply