Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

History walk: Phillip Johnson clearly explains Darwin’s two-platoon strategy

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Wintery Knight reminds us of ID “godfather” Phillip Johnson’s view of theistic evolution (sometimes called Christian evolution or Christian Darwinism):

The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of NaturalismThe National Academy’s way of dealing with the religious implications of evolution is akin to the two-platoon system in American football. When the leading figures of evolutionary science feel free to say what they really believe, writers such as Edward O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Carl Sagan, Steven Pinker, Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin and others state the “God is dead” thesis aggressively, invoking the authority of science to silence any theistic protest. That is the offensive platoon, and the National Academy never raises any objection to its promoting this worldview.At other times, however, the scientific elite has to protect the teaching of the “fact of evolution” from objections by religious conservatives who know what the offensive platoon is saying and who argue that the science educators are insinuating a worldview that goes far beyond the data. When the objectors are too numerous or influential to be ignored, the defensive platoon takes the field. That is when we read those spin-doctored reassurances saying that many scientists are religious (in some sense), that science does not claim to have proved that God does not exist (but merely that he does not affect the natural world), and that science and religion are separate realms which should never be mixed (unless it is the materialists who are doing the mixing). Once the defensive platoon has done its job it leaves the field, and the offensive platoon goes right back to telling the public that science has shown that “God” is permanently out of business. ( The Wedge of Truth, IVP 2000, pp. 88-89).

Johnson was the author of an influential 1993 book, Darwin on Trial.

Comments

Leave a Reply