Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Metaphors, Design Recognition, and the Design Matrix

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here are excerpts from The Design Matrix by Mike Gene:

Metaphors such as “fear”, “cost”, “abhor” and “angry”, commonly share the projection of consciousness onto the world. Metaphors such as these represent the human tendency to view the world through anthropomorphic glasses. However, the metaphors employed by molecular biologists are not of this type.
….
Metaphors typically break down when we begin to take them literally.

[but] The design terminology that is used in the language of molecular biology does not break down when interpreted literally
….

there is a basic and literal truth to the use of design terminology in molecular biology–these technological concepts are just too useful. Metaphors are certainly useful when explaining concepts to other human beings, yet the design terminology often goes beyond pedagogy–it provides true insight into the molecular and cellular processes. An understanding of our own designed artifacts, along with the principles required to make them, can guide the practice of molecular biology.

Why is it that some metaphors are no where near as effective for describing biology as well other metaphors, especially design metaphors?

Mike Gene recognizes qualitatively the enigma that others recognize quantitatively. There is an improbable coincidence between the architecture of human-made systems and the architecture of biological systems. Recognition of these coincidences is the recognition of specified complexity, and recognition of specified complexity is the recognition of design. Outside of biotic reality, there are no other assemblages of matter in the universe which fit design metaphors more exactly than those found in biology.

I liked Mike’s book, but I especially liked Chapter 3. Chapter 3 suggests the fact that biology is well described by design metaphors is a clue that biological systems (like birds, plants, and bunnies) are intelligently designed. UD readers are invited to read about the other clues which Mike outlines in his book, and the consilience of these clues constitutes The Design Matrix.

Notes:

From wiki:

Metaphor (from the from Latin metaphora; see the Greek origin below) is language that directly compares seemingly unrelated subjects. It is a figure of speech that compares two or more things without using the words “like” or “as.” More generally, a metaphor describes a first subject as being or equal to a second object in some way. This device is known for usage in literature, especially in poetry, where with few words, emotions and associations from one context are associated with objects and entities in a different context. A simpler definition is the comparison of two unrelated things without using the words “like” or “as”, the use of these words would create a simile. For example,she is a button.(as cute as a button)

Comments
I find the view of metaphor here rather simplistic. A more sophisticated understanding of metaphor is found contemporary scholarship. I would recommend especially the work of the linguist George Lakoff and colleagues (Mark Johnson, Mark Turner, and others). In studies beginning with Metaphors we Live By and continuing through more recent work, Lakoff's way of thinking has introduced the notion that metaphors are conceptual relationships rather than rhetorical figures. This work transformed the simplistic view of metaphor we all got in high school (the kind presented above). In actuality, metaphors are not linguistic equations but ways of understanding that are more or less one-directional and depend on an inequality between the things compared. In metaphor, we understand what Lakoff calls the "target domain" in terms of what Lakoff calls the "source domain," and not the other way round. We don't understand the source in terms of the target. An example. When Emily Dickinson writes
Because I could not stop for death He kindly stopped for me
the metaphor is LIFE IS A JOURNEY where the target domain is life and the source domain is journey. The thing to be understood is "life," and "journey" maps onto it because we've all been on journeys, but nobody I know has lived a complete life. It is because we don't understand "life" that Dickinson's poem works. It doesn't help us understand "journeys" -- we already know what a journey is. To the point at hand, the metaphor BIOLOGICAL LIFE IS DESIGNED works not because there is something "real" about the relationship but because the person who uses it doesn't understand "biological life." The source domain can cast light on the target domain, but it doesn't provide "knowledge" of it. In fact, there's a sense in which it depends on ignorance of the target domain -- because the more we know about the target domain in any metaphor, the more we can find ways in which the metaphor breaks down.David Kellogg
March 23, 2009
March
03
Mar
23
23
2009
04:16 PM
4
04
16
PM
PDT
Nice post. As an aside, here's what Aristotle wrote about metaphors:
The greatest thing by far is to be a master of metaphor. It is a sign of genius, since a good metaphor implies an intuitive perception of the similarity in dissimilars. Metaphor is the application of an alien name by transference either from genus to species, or from species to genus, or from species to species, or by analogy, that is, proportion.
Aristotle, Poetics. It is interesting to note that Sir Isaac Newton and his nemesis Gottfried Leibniz were convinced that almost all ancient myths were intended as metaphors for other things, especially the myths that are too strange to be litterally true.Mapou
March 23, 2009
March
03
Mar
23
23
2009
03:36 PM
3
03
36
PM
PDT
"There is an improbable coincidence between the architecture of human-made systems and the architecture of biological systems." Improbable coincidence . . . I think you're going to invoke cries of "God of the gaps" with that kind of language. Aside from the logical difficulty of trying to prove a negative. And I wonder if any engineer would design a motor this way really . . . .Jerad
March 23, 2009
March
03
Mar
23
23
2009
02:45 PM
2
02
45
PM
PDT
Mike Gene's website is: http://designmatrix.wordpress.com/scordova
March 23, 2009
March
03
Mar
23
23
2009
02:36 PM
2
02
36
PM
PDT
1 3 4 5

Leave a Reply