Culture Darwinism Intelligent Design

Rational Religion’s conversations with Darwin skeptic David Berlinski

Spread the love

Philosopher and novelist David Berlinski is an early and interesting Darwin skeptic. His iconic 1996 Commentary essay, The Deniable Darwin, set thousands of people thinking.

Anyway, hat tip to Philip Cunningham:

1:16 – Berlinski’s background

2:17 – Does Materialism makes sense?

3:47 – What are the Laws of Nature

10:01 – What is consciousness?

15:47 – Is Artificial Intelligence a threat?

19:36 – Is Darwinian Evolution on its way out?

23:28 – How did language originate?

35:03 – Does religion poison human morality? 37:35 – Can science teach us morality? 40:49 – How influential has New Atheism been? 41:24 – Spiritual but not religious/ are we just bodies? 42:52 – Can religious ideas make a comeback in the west?

35:03 – Does religion poison human morality?

37:35 – Can science teach us morality?

40:49 – How influential has New Atheism been?

41:24 – Spiritual but not religious/ are we just bodies?

42:52 – Can religious ideas make a comeback in the west?



See also: Hoover Institution interview with David Berlinski

David Berlinski with Mark Levin: The Link Between Evolution, Science And Progressivism

Follow UD News at Twitter!

3 Replies to “Rational Religion’s conversations with Darwin skeptic David Berlinski

  1. 1
    Brother Brian says:

    I started watching this and the first impression was that Berlinsky is an arrogant pompous jerk. Please convince me that I am wrong.

  2. 2
    ET says:

    Arrogant, pompous jerks. Sounds like every evolutionist.

    Evos hate Berlinski because he shreds their “arguments” and makes it look easy. He exposes their many houses of cards and they crash with a wave of his hand and his soft spoken words. His is an intellect evos do not want to deal with. And they will do anything but actually respond to what he is saying.

  3. 3
    chris haynes says:

    One of our nice Atheist friends claimed this:
    “David Berlinski is an arrogant pompous jerk!!!!!! ”

    Whatever.

    Notice that our friend didn’t claim this:
    “David Berlinski is wrong”
    I mean, in Science, isn’t being right the bottom line?

Leave a Reply