Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Ribosome a diligent proofreader

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

As you’re reading this keep in mind it’s all due to a random dance of atoms. No design here. Matter, chance, and POOF it’s alive. Yeah right.

From Science Daily

The Ribosome: Perfectionist Protein-maker Trashes Errors

ScienceDaily (Jan. 9, 2009) — The enzyme machine that translates a cell’s DNA code into the proteins of life is nothing if not an editorial perfectionist.

Johns Hopkins researchers, reporting in the journal Nature January 7, have discovered a new “proofreading step” during which the suite of translational tools called the ribosome recognizes errors, just after making them, and definitively responds by hitting its version of a “delete” button.

It turns out, the Johns Hopkins researchers say, that the ribosome exerts far tighter quality control than anyone ever suspected over its precious protein products which, as workhorses of the cell, carry out the very business of life.

“What we now know is that in the event of miscoding, the ribosome cuts the bond and aborts the protein-in-progress, end of story,” says Rachel Green, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and professor of molecular biology and genetics in the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “There’s no second chance.” Previously, Green says, molecular biologists thought the ribosome tightly managed its actions only prior to the actual incorporation of the next building block by being super-selective about which chemical ingredients it allows to enter the process.

Because a protein’s chemical “shape” dictates its function, mistakes in translating assembly codes can be toxic to cells, resulting in the misfolding of proteins often associated with neurodegenerative conditions. Working with bacterial ribosomes, Green and her team watched them react to lab-induced chemical errors and were surprised to see that the protein-manufacturing process didn’t proceed as usual, getting past the error and continuing its “walk” along the DNA’s protein-encoding genetic messages.

“We thought that once the mistake was made, it would have just gone on to make the next bond and the next,” Green says. “But instead, we noticed that one mistake on the ribosomal assembly line begets another, and it’s this compounding of errors that leads to the partially finished protein being tossed into the cellular trash,” she adds.

To their further surprise, the ribosome lets go of error-laden proteins 10,000 times faster than it would normally release error-free proteins, a rate of destruction that Green says is “shocking” and reveals just how much of a stickler the ribosome is about high-fidelity protein synthesis.

“These are not subtle numbers,” she says, noting that there’s a clear biological cost for this ribosomal editing and jettisoning of errors, but a necessary expense.

“The cell is a wasteful system in that it makes something and then says, forget it, throw it out,” Green concedes. “But it’s evidently worth the waste to increase fidelity. There are places in life where fidelity matters.”

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health with support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

In addition to Rachel Green, Hani S. Zaher, also of Johns Hopkins, was author of the paper.

Adapted from materials provided by Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions.

Comments
Error-control systems in a system allegedly created by errors in copying genetic code. Will wonders never cease.geoffrobinson
January 13, 2009
January
01
Jan
13
13
2009
06:55 AM
6
06
55
AM
PDT
“The cell is a wasteful system in that it makes something and then says, forget it, throw it out,” Green concedes. “But it’s evidently worth the waste to increase fidelity. There are places in life where fidelity matters.” Exactly what one would predict would be programed into a nanobot. A designer can select among slightly-less-than-perfect alternatives for one that is “good enough.” But a nanobot has no ability to choose along a continuum. So the designer designed it to select for “perfect or nothing.”Barry Arrington
January 13, 2009
January
01
Jan
13
13
2009
06:43 AM
6
06
43
AM
PDT
Joseph, You just don't understand the process. At some time in the past this version of the ribosome was selected for. Cells that contained this version were more likely to survive and thus we have a version that is better at proof reading. Here it is in Dr. Green's own words. " 'I'm happy to be pulled back from trying to recapitulate the RNA World,' Green notes. 'But understanding that world is part of what pulls me to the ribosome. When you open it up, its core being is a nest of RNA. I'm happy to be studying the thing that won out in evolution.' " In other words it was selected. What a wonderful concept selection is. It is better than scaffolding or co-option but not quite as powerful as emergent. With magic tools like these how could you doubt the Darwinian theory of evolution.jerry
January 13, 2009
January
01
Jan
13
13
2009
06:42 AM
6
06
42
AM
PDT
(sarcasm alert) Do we SEE the designer doing the editing? No. Therefor how can you say the ribosome was designed? You people and your metaphysics... But anyway it will be very interesting to investigate thjis- as in how does the ribosome "recognize", ie how does it "know" what it is supposed to be producing? This whole process must have been something of a shock to the investigators. And I would say another nail in the coffin of Darwinism.Joseph
January 13, 2009
January
01
Jan
13
13
2009
06:01 AM
6
06
01
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply