In his forthcoming chapter, *Does the Universe Need God?*, Sean Carroll (the physicist, not the geneticist) argues that while invoking god as an explanation for natural phenomena was once reasonable, now we can do much better. It is an example of the extent to which otherwise very smart people resort to special pleading to get the right answer. *Read more*

## 10 Replies to “Sean Carroll: Does the Universe Need God?”

### Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Dr. Hunter it is interesting to note, as I’ve asked materialists before, which material parameter, exactly, is going to prevent a higher ‘transcendent’ dimension from existing? In fact, exactly which material parameter is going to prevent a ‘highest’ transcendent dimension, inhabited by a highest transcendent Being, from existing? And unlike the multiverse which has no empirical evidence to support its postulation, ‘higher dimensionality’ does have empirical support!,,

At the 8:30 mark of this following video, a description of the work of Bernhard Riemann, the son of a Christian minister, whose work on the math of ‘higher dimensionality’ opened the door for Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity as well as, I believe, opened the door for quantum mechanics;

BBC The Story of Maths Ep3: The Frontiers of Space

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6ZdqHMHtoA

Bernhard Riemann

http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/meh/riemann.html

further notes;

Reflections on the ‘infinite transcendent information’ framework:

The weight of mass becomes infinite at the speed of light, thus mass will never go the speed of light. As well, mass would disappear from our sight if it could go the speed of light, because, from our non-speed of light perspective, distance in direction of travel will shrink to zero for the mass going the speed of light, whereas conversely, if mass could travel at the speed of light its size will stay the same while all other frames of reference not traveling the speed of light will disappear from its sight. As well time, as we understand it, would come to a stop at the speed of light. To grasp the whole ‘time stopping at the speed of light’ concept more easily, imagine moving away from the face of a clock at the speed of light. Would not the hands on the clock stay stationary as you moved away from the face of the clock at the speed of light?

Special Relativity – Time Dilation and Length Contraction – video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY

For us to hypothetically travel at the speed of light, in this universe, only gets us to first base as far as quantum entanglement, or teleportation, are concerned. That is to say, traveling at the speed of light only gets us to the place where time, as we understand it, comes to complete stop for light, i.e. gets us to the eternal, ‘past and future folding into now’, framework of time. This higher dimension ‘eternal’ inference for the time framework of light is warranted because light is not ‘frozen within time’ yet it is shown that time, as we understand it, does not pass for light.

“I’ve just developed a new theory of eternity.”

Albert Einstein – The Einstein Factor – Reader’s Digest

http://www.readersdigest.co.za.....26pageno=3

Also, hypothetically traveling at the speed of light in this universe would be instantaneous travel for the person going at the speed of light. This is because time does not pass for them, but, and this is a big but; this ‘timeless’ travel is still not instantaneous and transcendent to our temporal framework of time, i.e. Speed of light travel, to our temporal frame of reference, is still not completely transcendent of our framework since light appears to take time to travel from our perspective. In information teleportation though the ‘time not passing’, eternal, framework is not only achieved in the speed of light framework/dimension, but also in our temporal framework. That is to say, the instantaneous teleportation/travel of information is instantaneous to both the temporal and speed of light frameworks, not just the speed of light framework. Information teleportation/travel is not limited by time, nor space, in any way, shape or form, in any frame of reference, as light is seemingly limited to us. Thus ‘pure transcendent information’ is shown to be timeless (eternal) and completely transcendent of all material frameworks. Moreover, concluding from all lines of evidence we have now examined; transcendent, eternal, infinite information is indeed real and the framework in which ‘It’ resides is the primary reality (highest dimension) that can exist, (in so far as our limited perception of a primary reality, highest dimension, can be discerned).

“An illusion can never go faster than the speed limit of reality”

Akiane – Child Prodigy – Artwork homepage – http://www.artakiane.com/ – Music video – http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4204586

Logic also dictates ‘a decision’ must have been made, by the ‘transcendent, eternal, infinite information’ from the primary timeless (eternal) reality ‘It’ inhabits, in order to purposely create a temporal reality with highly specified, irreducible complex, parameters from a infinite set of possibilities in the proper sequential order. Thus this infinite transcendent information, which is the primary reality of our reality, is shown to be alive by yet another line of evidence besides the necessity for a ‘first mover’ to explain quantum wave collapse.

The First Cause Must Be A Personal Being – William Lane Craig – video

http://www.metacafe.com/w/4813914

etc.. etc.. etc..

though I’ve shown this video a few times before, I think this video will really get the ‘higher dimensionality’ point across very well:

Please compare the similarity of the optical effect, noted at the 3:22 minute mark of the following video, when the 3-Dimensional world ‘folds and collapses’ into a tunnel shape around the direction of travel as an observer moves towards the ‘higher dimension’ of the speed of light, with the ‘light at the end of the tunnel’ reported in very many Near Death Experiences:

Traveling At The Speed Of Light – Optical Effects – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5733303/

Near Death Experience – The Tunnel, The Light, The Life Review – view

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4200200/

The NDE and the Tunnel – Kevin Williams’ research conclusions

Excerpt: I started to move toward the light. The way I moved, the physics, was completely different than it is here on Earth. It was something I had never felt before and never felt since. It was a whole different sensation of motion. I obviously wasn’t walking or skipping or crawling. I was not floating. I was flowing. I was flowing toward the light. I was accelerating and I knew I was accelerating, but then again, I didn’t really feel the acceleration. I just knew I was accelerating toward the light. Again, the physics was different – the physics of motion of time, space, travel. It was completely different in that tunnel, than it is here on Earth. I came out into the light and when I came out into the light, I realized that I was in heaven.(Barbara Springer)

The NDE and the Tunnel – Kevin Williams’ research conclusions

Excerpt: I saw a pinpoint of light in the distance. The black mass around me began to take on more of the shape of a tunnel, and I felt myself traveling through it at an even greater speed, rushing toward the light. I was instinctively attracted to it, although again, I felt that others might not. As I approached it, I noticed the figure of a man standing in it, with the light radiating all around him. (Betty Eadie)

http://www.near-death.com/expe.....rch16.html

———–

Speed Of Light – Near Death Experience Tunnel – Turin Shroud – video

http://www.vimeo.com/18371644

Bornagain,

To show there is no hard feelings from our earlier discussion, I thought I’d share something with you that you, of all people could appreciate. Cheers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

“It’s unclear why God would do so much more fine-tuning of the state of the universe than seems to have been necessary.”

To quote Carroll, that’s just the way it is. Seriously, the level of stupid in this comment is amazing. You don’t understand why God did something, so that means that He probably didn’t do it? Huh?

Also, “I don’t understand why it is the case, so It Just Is, end of story.”

jon specter, cool song thanks, here is one that you may like;

Building 429 – Glory Defined (Video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GanLxNUEzGU

Does Carroll believe this quotation from Hawkins?

“Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing.”

And how is that not magic?

Cornelius:

Astronomically unlikely events don’t matter if you have an astronomical number of chances.Unfortunately for Darwinists, there are pitifully few chances to produce astronomically unlikely events, like converting Lucy into Mozart. In this case we’re talking about at most 10^8 or 10^9 individuals and reproductive events, while it took 10^20 reproductive events for the malarial parasite to acquire resistance to chloroquine.

OT;

The Mathematics Of Higher Dimensionality – Gauss & Riemann – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/6199520/

Carl Friedrich Gauss was a devout Christian who supported monarchy and opposed Napoleon, whom he saw as an outgrowth of the revolution.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss

Gauss’s work on complex numbers, like the square root of negative one, extend the idea of the one-dimensional number line to the two-dimensional complex plane by using the number line for the real part and adding a vertical axis to plot the imaginary part. In this way the complex numbers contain the ordinary real numbers while extending them in order to solve problems that would be impossible with only real numbers. This ‘higher dimensional number line’, particularly this understanding gained for the ‘higher dimensionality’ of the square root of negative one (i), is essential for understanding quantum mechanics:

Finely Tuned Big Bang, Elvis In The Multiverse, and the Schrodinger Equation – Granville Sewell – audio

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4233012

At the 4:00 minute mark of the preceding audio, Dr. Sewell comments on the ‘transcendent’ and ‘constant’ Schrodinger Equation;

‘In chapter 2, I talk at some length on the Schrodinger Equation which is called the fundamental equation of chemistry. It’s the equation that governs the behavior of the basic atomic particles subject to the basic forces of physics. This equation is a partial differential equation with a complex valued solution. By complex valued I don’t mean complicated, I mean involving solutions that are complex numbers, a+b^i, which is extraordinary that the governing equation, basic equation, of physics, of chemistry, is a partial differential equation with complex valued solutions. There is absolutely no reason why the basic particles should obey such a equation that I can think of except that it results in elements and chemical compounds with extremely rich and useful chemical properties. In fact I don’t think anyone familiar with quantum mechanics would believe that we’re ever going to find a reason why it should obey such an equation, they just do! So we have this basic, really elegant mathematical equation, partial differential equation, which is my field of expertise, that governs the most basic particles of nature and there is absolutely no reason why, anyone knows of, why it does, it just does. British physicist Sir James Jeans said “From the intrinsic evidence of His creation, the great architect of the universe begins to appear as a pure mathematician”, so God is a mathematician to’.

Michael Denton – Mathematical Truths Are Transcendent And Beautiful – Square root of -1 is built into the fabric of reality – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4003918

Bernhard Riemann was the son of a Christian minister who, like Gauss, was a devout Christian his entire life and whose work on the geometry of ‘higher dimensionality’ was essential for opening the door for Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity;

Bernhard Riemann

Excerpt: For his Habiltationsvortrag Riemann proposed three topics, and against his expectations Gauss chose the one on geometry. Riemann’s lecture, “On the hypotheses that lie at the foundation of geometry” was given on June 10, 1854. This extraordinary work introduced (what is now called) an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold and its curvature tensor. It also, prophetically, discussed the relation of this mathematical space to actual space. Riemann’s vision was realized by Einstein’s general theory of relativity sixty years later.

http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/meh/riemann.html

4-Dimensional Space-Time Of General Relativity – Every 3D Place Is Center In This Universe – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3991873/

The Center Of The Universe Is Life – General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Entropy and The Shroud Of Turin – video

http://www.metacafe.com/w/5070355

Turin Shroud Enters 3D Age – Pictures, Articles and Videos

https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1gDY4CJkoFedewMG94gdUk1Z1jexestdy5fh87RwWAfg

4-Dimensional Quarter Power Scaling In Biology – video

http://www.metacafe.com/w/5964041/

The ‘Fourth Dimension’ Of Living Systems

https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Gs_qvlM8-7bFwl9rZUB9vS6SZgLH17eOZdT4UbPoy0Y

The Mathematics Of Higher Dimensionality – Gauss & Riemann – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/6199520/

Carl Friedrich Gauss was a devout Christian who supported monarchy and opposed Napoleon, whom he saw as an outgrowth of the revolution.

Gauss’s work on complex numbers, like the square root of negative one, extend the idea of the one-dimensional number line to the two-dimensional complex plane by using the number line for the real part and adding a vertical axis to plot the imaginary part. In this way the complex numbers contain the ordinary real numbers while extending them in order to solve problems that would be impossible with only real numbers. This ‘higher dimensional number line’, particularly this understanding gained for the ‘higher dimensionality’ of the square root of negative one (i), is essential for understanding quantum mechanics:

Finely Tuned Big Bang, Elvis In The Multiverse, and the Schrodinger Equation – Granville Sewell – audio

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4233012

At the 4:00 minute mark of the preceding audio, Dr. Sewell comments on the ‘transcendent’ and ‘constant’ Schrodinger Equation;

‘In chapter 2, I talk at some length on the Schrodinger Equation which is called the fundamental equation of chemistry. It’s the equation that governs the behavior of the basic atomic particles subject to the basic forces of physics. This equation is a partial differential equation with a complex valued solution. By complex valued I don’t mean complicated, I mean involving solutions that are complex numbers, a+b^i, which is extraordinary that the governing equation, basic equation, of physics, of chemistry, is a partial differential equation with complex valued solutions. There is absolutely no reason why the basic particles should obey such a equation that I can think of except that it results in elements and chemical compounds with extremely rich and useful chemical properties. In fact I don’t think anyone familiar with quantum mechanics would believe that we’re ever going to find a reason why it should obey such an equation, they just do! So we have this basic, really elegant mathematical equation, partial differential equation, which is my field of expertise, that governs the most basic particles of nature and there is absolutely no reason why, anyone knows of, why it does, it just does. British physicist Sir James Jeans said “From the intrinsic evidence of His creation, the great architect of the universe begins to appear as a pure mathematician”, so God is a mathematician to’.

Michael Denton – Mathematical Truths Are Transcendent And Beautiful – Square root of -1 is built into the fabric of reality – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4003918

Bernhard Riemann was the son of a Christian minister who, like Gauss, was a devout Christian his entire life and whose work on the geometry of ‘higher dimensionality’ was essential for opening the door for Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity;

Bernhard Riemann

Excerpt: For his Habiltationsvortrag Riemann proposed three topics, and against his expectations Gauss chose the one on geometry. Riemann’s lecture, “On the hypotheses that lie at the foundation of geometry” was given on June 10, 1854. This extraordinary work introduced (what is now called) an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold and its curvature tensor. It also, prophetically, discussed the relation of this mathematical space to actual space. Riemann’s vision was realized by Einstein’s general theory of relativity sixty years later.

http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/meh/riemann.html

4-Dimensional Space-Time Of General Relativity – Every 3D Place Is Center In This Universe – video

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3991873/

The Center Of The Universe Is Life – General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Entropy and The Shroud Of Turin – video

http://www.metacafe.com/w/5070355

Turin Shroud Enters 3D Age – Pictures, Articles and Videos

https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1gDY4CJkoFedewMG94gdUk1Z1jexestdy5fh87RwWAfg

4-Dimensional Quarter Power Scaling In Biology – video

http://www.metacafe.com/w/5964041/

The ‘Fourth Dimension’ Of Living Systems

https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Gs_qvlM8-7bFwl9rZUB9vS6SZgLH17eOZdT4UbPoy0Y