You’ve gotta love Sev’s refreshing honesty. In this post I noted that killing little babies was not uncommon in ancient cultures. And then I asked:
[Materialists] say that morality is a social construct; which means that “good” means what the people of a society collectively deem to be good. If that is so, was it an affirmatively good thing when an ancient pagan killed a baby girl because she was a baby girl instead of a baby boy?
Sev’s response:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
I wonder if Sev will continue to following his logic with these examples:
Enslaving African Americans in the American South prior to the Civil War:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
Human sacrifice in Aztec religious rituals:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
The communists kill 7 million in Ukraine in the 1930s:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
The National Socialists kill 18 million in Europe in the 1940s:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
The communists kill 45 million in China in the 1960s:
it was an affirmatively good thing for them then but it is certainly not an affirmatively good thing for me now. Who is right? As far as I can see, there is no absolute standard against which to measure it.
How about it Sev? Does your logic extend to all of these examples? If not, why not?
UPDATE
In the comments section Sev answers my question: “Yes, it does.” You have to hand it to him. He is a nihilist, but at least he is an honest nihilist.