Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

The man who knows everything: My MercatorNet column

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

At the Canadian Science Writers’ Association convention in Sudbury, Ontario, our Sunday dinner speaker was American theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State University, who presented sample clips from famous sci-fi films. And a whole lot more.

Would you be astonished to learn that the films portray implausible or impossible physics? No? Filmmakers value audience numbers more than atomic numbers. His clips entertained, but did not surprise:

However, his talk frequently targeted religion and politics: although he professed to respect theists, he offered snarky asides suggesting that fear of science is growing in Canada (because it might damage religion), adding, “In many ways I hope it does, but it wasn’t designed to do that.”

Dr. Krauss also told the assembled science communicators that in many key science controversies, there is only one side and journalists confuse matters by seeking out both sides.

Not so. New discoveries in science often result from minor, not major, deviations from an expected result.

Read more here.

Comments
Re transcript: I would type it myself, if I got the file. I think Dr. Krauss was video-cammed, so there must be a file of some kind, but do not know to whom it belongs. For the record: What Dr. Krauss said that night in no way contradicts his other statements elsewhere. I do not know of a reason to doubt that those are really his views.O'Leary
June 27, 2009
June
06
Jun
27
27
2009
10:27 AM
10
10
27
AM
PDT
I think the next minor deviation in science is the double slit experiment, or teleportation. I go to the youtube video and see naturalists posting about how double slit doesn't matter because scientists must have not accounted for enough variables, that's desperate.lamarck
June 27, 2009
June
06
Jun
27
27
2009
09:30 AM
9
09
30
AM
PDT
Is there a transcript of Dr. Krauss's speech available online? It would be helpful to read so we can see both sides in this argument - so far we just have Ms O'Leary's interpretation of the event.JTaylor
June 27, 2009
June
06
Jun
27
27
2009
09:19 AM
9
09
19
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply