Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Woman better off when half her brain was removed?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

File:A small cup of coffee.JPG From Mental Floss:

From the outside, Elena del Peral seems to be like any other high-achieving college senior. She goofs around the campus quad of Massachusetts’ Curry College with her classmates and posts pictures on Facebook of birthday drinks with girlfriends. She holds a philanthropic job at a childhood cancer foundation and is on the dean’s list. She’s friendly, bright, and fit. Outwardly, perhaps the most provocative thing about her is that she’ll wear both a Yankees cap and a Red Sox jersey at the same time—a peacemaker among the long-standing rivals.

But beneath her cap is one remarkable mind. Elena del Peral has only half a brain.

She was born with very severe epilepsy which not only destroyed the left side of her brain but greatly compromised the functioning of the right side via the corpus callosum that join the two.

At age six, del Peral underwent a battery of tests including MRIs, EEGs, and CAT scans. A team including neurologists and neurosurgeons pored over the results. They said her condition fit the criteria for a rare surgery that seemed radical but had yielded promising results in the past for people like her. It was called a hemispherectomy: “hemisphere,” half the brain; “-ectomy,” surgically removing it. In short, they wanted to remove half of Elena’s brain.

The ratinale?

“Language sets up shop by age two, three, and four, at which time we are learning how to speak,” Dr. Weiner says. “When the area that controls language is damaged, it can move. The earlier the insult, the more likely it is to move—the more plasticity.” That’s what happened in del Peral’s case. The left side of her brain was damaged in the womb, so language and motor function shifted to the right side before she was even born. At the time of her surgery, the left side of her brain, the source of her epilepsy, was doing more harm than good. More.

She must wwork harder than other students to succeed but reportedly gets good marks.

Incidentally, this radical surgery is not done as much any more, as the same results can be achieved simply by disconnecting the non-functioning part of the brain and removing really bad sections, leaving the hole to fill up with spinal fluid.

Another interesting case: Largely brain absent man functions normally

Because metaphysical naturalism is just plain wrong. The situation is not even as rare as supposed; just not diagnosed in the past.

Some other examples here:

First, there are not-easily-reducible anomalies. For example, the man rendered significantly brain-absent in an accident who achieved a remarkable recovery. And the normal 88-year-old man whose brain had never had a connection between the two halves (corpus callosum). Other patients with conditions as anomalous as his may function normally but never present themselves for a brain scan. These cases warn us that a brain is not just a material object like a car, and a mind is not just an illusion it creates. – “Neuroscience Tried Wholly Embracing Naturalism, But Then the Brain Got Away” More.

See also: The human mind, the skinny

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Andre i thought of that too but learn to keep my tongue. everybody complains about PC but everybody enables it. I just mean about fun humour and nothing of substance.Robert Byers
November 17, 2015
November
11
Nov
17
17
2015
09:27 PM
9
09
27
PM
PDT
Are gender jokes allowed or are we totally leftist libral pc?Andre
November 17, 2015
November
11
Nov
17
17
2015
07:16 AM
7
07
16
AM
PDT
these examples should hint to people we are not our brains. Our brain is just a tool for a thinking soul. I say its just a giant memory machine and can readapt to how it wires the memory. The old brain crowd must scramble to explain how removing half a brain makes no difference. Why did evolution select so much brain increase for man if it makes no difference? Could mankind be as smart with only half as much brain and if so why not in early evolutiion days? Don't they size up the brain to figure out how smart hominids were in the past? Hey what about three quarters removed or more? Would it make any difference then?Robert Byers
November 16, 2015
November
11
Nov
16
16
2015
10:14 PM
10
10
14
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply