ID’s problem in a nutshell
UD Pro-Darwinism essay challenge unanswered a year later, I: Let’s get the essence of design theory as a scientific, inductive inference straight
Today marks a full year since I issued an open challenge to Darwinists to ground their theory and its OOL extension and root, in light of actually observed capabilities of blind watchmaker mechanisms of chance and necessity through an essay I would host here at UD. The pivot of the challenge is the modern version of the very first Icon of Evolution, Darwin’s Tree of Life (which in an incomplete form is the ONLY image in original editions of Origin of Species), here typified by a case from the Smithsonian: I first did so in an exchange thread, specifically responding to Jerad, then headlined it some days later. In lieu of prompt serious replies, I set up Wikipedia articles Read More ›
No methane on Mars disappoints current hopes for Martian life
Could songbirds have borrowed DNA to fuel migration?
ID theorist Mike Behe was refused a response in Microbe
Challenge to Uncommon Descenters from ID Facebook page
Official media story pitches Neanderthal man as not human
Cheap Clay Jar
There is a story about two men who were praying in the same place. One, burdened by the weight of his own sinfulness, would not even look up as he prayed. Instead, he fell to his knees and cried out in an anguished spirit, “Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner!” The other man was very religious, and he prayed like this: “Lord, I thank you that I am not sinful like other men, that guy over there for instance. I give money to the church, I fast every week, I follow all the rules. Amen.” The first man, we are told, walked away justified before God, but not the second. I understand this story. If I have a good attribute it Read More ›
Altruism is just another form of manipulation?
Now we are told that “generosity leads to evolutionary success”
Human brains, we are told, are “hardwired for empathy, friendship”
Skepticism is largely wasted on “skeptics”: Astrology division
Historian hostile to ID has a new expanded edition of book out
Here is David Penny’s New Confirmation of Evolution
David Penny and co workers are out with another confirmation of evolution. In a Darwin’s God exclusive, Penny assures us that there is no question about the fact of evolution, but from his Popperian perspective, it is always important to put forward testable models. And the result, as usual, is that evolution wins yet again. One result, from Column 7 of Table 2 of the paper, shows that the probability that the proteins in question could have arisen by chance is 1.94 x 10^-19. And that is just one of their many tests. In other words, evolution is pretty much a done deal. As they conclude: “The analyses establish that some form of ancestral convergence is occurring.” There’s only one problem: Read More ›