It’s not just the design theorists.
Severe language warning, but …
Mouse junk DNA: “vast amounts of information vital to gene function”
Some of Ann Gauger’s critics claim she says that humans are four million years old
He said it: Atheist Julian Baggini on living without hope
Physicist Rob Sheldon offers some thoughts on Sal Cordova vs. Granville Sewell on 2nd Law Thermo
Coffee!!: Otter pup’s swimming lesson
Evolutionists Surprised Again: The Evolutionary Principle “Does Not Appear to Apply” to RNase P
According to Sidney Altman it makes sense that there are enzymes, such as RNase P, which include RNA components in addition to proteins. After all, the mother of all such ribonucleoproteins, the ribosome, is too complex to have evolved by itself. Surely less complex ribonucleoproteins must have evolved in the process: Read more
Evolutionists Are Now Saying That Evolution Created an Optimized Evolutionary Process
Evolutionists have always liked our immune system for its apparent Darwinian process of generating randomized antibodies and, through a feedback-selection process, amplifying those antibodies that successfully bind to the pathogens. Is it not an example of natural selection acting on random mutations—a proof-of-concept of Darwinian evolution before our very eyes? Such conclusions are another sign of the religious dogma that drives science. In fact our immune system not only operates in an infinitesimally smaller design space than would evolution, it performs its experiments astronomically faster than evolution ever could. Furthermore our immune system comes with a built-in, complex, feedback system that performs the selection. In other words, the selection is not natural as it is supposed to be in evolution. Read More ›
Audio: Would Thomas Jefferson have wanted design theory taught in school?
Epigenetics to be to 21st century what genetics was to 20th century?
The Higgs hunt … Now we must find out what we found out
Do rats laugh? At cats?
Response to Scordova
UPDATE: In his comment #9 below, Sal Cordova says he doesn’t believe that a backward running tornado, turning rubble into houses and cars, would violate the second law either (more precisely, he says the burden of proof is on me to show mathematically that it would, as though I were the first to claim this). So, no, if you don’t think the second law should be used in any application that isn’t quantifiable, and there are others with this point of view, you aren’t going to think it has anything to do with evolution either, that’s about all you need to know about our disagreement. My point of view, and that of most general physics textbooks (thermodynamics texts, on the Read More ›