http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/evolving-argument-creates-new-battle/2005/08/05/1123125903978.html?oneclick=true

The Intelligent Design Bogeyman By David Limbaugh August 04, 2005 http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2005/08/new_column_the_5.html —– The Little Engine That Could…Undo Darwinism By Dan Peterson Published 8/5/2005 12:05:32 AM http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8543 —– God’s chance creation George Coyne Cardinal Christoph Schönborn claims random evolution is incompatible with belief in a creator God. Here, in an exclusive rebuttal of that view, the Vatican’s chief astronomer says that science reflects God’s infinite purpose http://www.thetablet.co.uk/cgi-bin/register.cgi/tablet-01063

At my prompting, Beliefnet has now reverted to the original title (go here). [Earlier I had written:] After President Bush’s recently stated public support for teaching intelligent design, an editor at Beliefnet asked me to respond to it. Moreover, she asked me to clarify where I stand on creationism. I responded with a brief essay that appears on my designinference.com website (go here). I titled that essay “Why President Bush Got It Right about Intelligent Design.” That essay has now appeared on Beliefnet, where it was re-titled — without my knowledge or permission — “Intelligent Design, Yes; Creationism, No” (go here). This new title is contentious and misleading. My target in this essay is Darwinian materialism. I discuss creationism in Read More ›

Here’s a little piece I did for an online Christian news service about President Bush’s recent remarks supporting the teaching of ID: http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.08.Commending_President_Bush.pdf.

Notre Dame ReSource: Evolution and Christianity
By: Dennis Brown
Date: July 18, 2005

A renowned philosopher from the University of Notre Dame supports recent comments by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn that belief in evolution as accepted by some in science today may be incompatible with Christian beliefs. Read More ›

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-creation3aug03,1,1792822.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true

Bush Remarks On ‘Intelligent Design’ Theory Fuel Debate By Peter Baker and Peter Slevin Washington Post Staff Writers Wednesday, August 3, 2005; A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080201686_pf.html

I’ll be on CNN today at 10:30am CST with Michael Shermer on Daryn Kagan’s program.

For Immediate Release Aug. 2, 2005

President Bush’s Support for Free Speech on Evolution and Intelligent Design Draws Praise from Discovery Institute

Read More ›

Below is what I wrote earlier. The appearance on Fox has been cancelled because of technical difficulties getting their truck to hook up with the satellite. CNN still appears to be a go. Steve Meyer will be appearing with Bill O’Reilly tonight [Meyer’s interview was cancelled. I expected all discussion of ID on the O’Reilly Factor to be cancelled on account of the Toronto crash, but it appears — see comment #3 below — that the other side got their say]. In the last two hours I’ve heard from Fox News and CNN. I’m to appear on The Big Story w/ John Gibson this afternoon (August 2nd) and on CNN tomorrow midday (August 3rd). This interest is in response to Read More ›

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/02/politics/main713302.shtml

(AP) President Bush said Monday he believes schools should discuss “intelligent design” alongside evolution when teaching students about the creation of life. Read More ›

Krauthammer, thoughtful and critical in other areas, continues his reflexive acceptance of Darwinism and dismissal of ID: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,1088714,00.html

The essays in this anthology (translated into Spanish) are by ID proponents and sympathizers. The contributors include Bill Craig, Robin Collins, Richard Swinburne, John Polkinghorne, Ted Peters, and me: DIOS Y LAS COSMOLOGÍAS MODERNAS La Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos (BAC, 2005) ha publicado recientemente un libro de gran interés desde varios puntos de vista: científico, filosófico y teológico. [edited by] Francisco José Soler Gil

Check out the following article in the July 28th, 2005 issue of Nature, which clearly indicates how improbability arguments can be used to eliminate randomness and infer design: “‘Fingerprinting’ documents and packaging: Unique surface imperfections serve as an easily identifiable feature in the fight against fraud.” I run through the logic here in the first two chapters of The Design Inference.