Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

A prof has resigned from Bethel College

Categories
Human evolution
News
Religion
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

At the Daily Beast, Karl Giberson tells us,

In a story becoming all too familiar, another pro-evolution faculty member has been forced to leave his evangelical institution. Jim Stump, longtime professor of philosophy, productive scholar, and popular, award-winning teacher at Bethel College in Indiana, resigned his position in June because of pressures put on the college by its sponsoring denomination, the Missionary Church.

The issue, once again, was evolution. Most members of the Missionary Church reject Darwin’s theory of evolution in favor of a literal interpretation of the creation story in the Book of Genesis. But many faculty members at Bethel College accept evolution and consider it part of their “teaching ministry” to help their students do the same, within the context of their faith. Such divergences exist in most evangelical denominations that sponsor liberal arts colleges but as long as faculty members are clearly evangelical in their faith the tensions are often manageable and an uneasy peace can be maintained.

First, it would help if Christians for Darwin groups were completely discredited, as they deserve to be, in these times of ferment around Darwinism.

Predictably, we are told,

Deborah Haarsma, the president of BioLogos, describes the organization she leads as “disheartened” by developments that put Stump “in the painful situation of having to choose between the scholarship to which he feels called and the academic community to which he has belonged for decades.” More.

Yes, this is all painful. But it raises a couple of questions: First, didn’t the guy notice after all these years how his denomination felt about these matters? Stump should be free to follow whatever scholarship he feels called to. But it doesn’t follow he can teach at an institution explicitly committed to a different vision.

What if I, a Catholic, were teaching at a Jehovah’s Witness institution, and promoting the views of the Catholic Church instead of those of the JWs? What should I reasonably expect to happen?

That is just the market functioning the way it is supposed to.

The many ID theorists driven out of institutions are actually in a quite different position from Stump: Their institutions accept the tax or donation dollar claiming that they do not support metaphysical naturalism in principle. But then it turns out they do, when anyone challenges them on an evidence or probability basis!

(At some Christian schools, you can holler all you want for Jesus, as long as it doesn’t make any sense.)

They just don’t want that to be generally known. Bethel was laudably clear as to what the institution exists to affirm.

If Stump is as good a prof as—so one gathers—he is, there should be no shortage of institutions happy to grab him.

See also: Theologian Peter Enns talks about why BioLogos did not renew his contract

and

Bill Dembski on the Evolutionary Informatics Lab – the one a Baylor dean tried to shut down (See Holler for Jesus as long as it makes no sense.)

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Mapou
What bothers me about YECs is how selective they are in their literal interpretations.
It's good to be aware of your own assumptions, since you are selective in your literal interpretations.Silver Asiatic
July 27, 2015
July
07
Jul
27
27
2015
06:04 AM
6
06
04
AM
PDT
seversky
but they forfeit any respect for their scholarship in science if what is good is decided by the clerical rather than the scientific community.
Normally, that would seem to be a reasonable idea, however one of the interesting things about science is that anyone who is a member of the "scientific community" is so by self-designation. No one can be expelled from the scientific community as such and no one has the authority to speak for it. No one even owns the definition of what is termed 'science'. Certainly, the clerical community can be part of anything considered "the science community" and have has much right to declare that evolution "is not science" as others have the right to claim that it is. This is all just a lot of circular debates - unresolvable. "The multiverse speculation is not science and anyone who defends it is not a scientist". What universally recognized authority figure is going to proclaim that to be right or wrong? As for gaining respect for scholarship in science, that also should be irrelevant. If a phenomenon has been observed and explained, then that doesn't need to be 'respected' by anyone.
college such as Bethel suppressing discussion of the theory of evolution and political regimes such as the communists who suppressed any views they held to be not consonant with their ideology
All colleges suppress ideas that are not consonant with their ideology.Silver Asiatic
July 27, 2015
July
07
Jul
27
27
2015
05:43 AM
5
05
43
AM
PDT
F/N: Some relevant clips -- pardon OCR and PDF stuff, follow links if you wish: http://www.bethelcollege.edu/students/undergrad/academic-dept-prog/faculty-bios/james-stump.html >>James Stump James Brent Stump is a graduate of Bethel College (1991) with a B.A. degree in Math and Science Education. After graduation, he and his wife Christine taught at a boarding school in Sierra Leone, West Africa, until their abrupt evacuation due to political unrest. He then pursued Philosophy in graduate school, earning an M.A. from Northern Illinois University (1995) and a Ph.D. from Boston University (2000). Jim has been teaching back at Bethel since 1998. When the Philosophy major was first established, Jim served as its program director. In 2003 he was asked to be the interim Academic Dean, and then in 2004 was made Vice President for Academic Services. His sojourn into administration lasted until 2008, when he returned to the teaching faculty. Now, as a full Professor of Philosophy, he once again directs the Philosophy major. Jim generally teaches the upper-level Philosophy courses in Symbolic Logic, Modern Philosophy, and Theory of Knowledge, as well as Introduction to Philosophy and Logic and Critical Thinking in the general education core. He also offers History of Christian Thought in the graduate program. For three summers, 2003-2005, Jim was Fellow in the Templeton-Oxford Seminars on Science and Religion. There he worked on a project in the Philosophy of Mind which culminated in conference presentations and journal articles. Two more recent projects are Christian Thought: A Historical Introduction (Routledge, 2010), which he co-authored with Bethel colleague Chad Meister, and A Companion to Science and Christianity, which he co-edited with Alan Padgett of Luther Seminary. His current research continues in the exciting and sometimes contentious area of science and religion. Jim is a frequent speaker both in and outside of Bethel. He and his wife Chris have three boys—Casey, Trevor, and Connor. They value family and friends, good music, international experiences, sport, and books.>> http://www.bethelcollege.edu/visitors/about-us/believe/resignation.html >>June 26, 2015 Open Letter regarding Dr. Jim Stump and the Statement on Human Origins Constituents ofBethel College: Though curricula on Human Origins is a very small part of the college’s curriculum, the topic has become a prominent theological conversation for two years at Bethel and remains an important pedagogical point of clari?cation for evangelical Christian institutions of higher education. Trust and communication is signi?cant to every college community, especially on sensitive developments. See below a joint statement by Jim Stump, Ph.D. — a veteran, valued, and popular professor of philosophy and leader ofBethel’s Honor’s Program -- and Gregg Chenoweth, Ph.D., president of Bethel College, which addresses Dr. Stump’s plan for altemate employment. Statement from Jim Stump_: I fully respect the right of the Bethel Board of Trustees to determine policies for the College. The recent "Educational Philosophy Statement on Origins," adopted by the Board in June 2015, re?ects the will of the broader community of which Bethel is a part. In considering this corporate connnitment, I decided to resign from my position at Bethel in order to pursue alternate work, rather than remain under the new Statement and bring tension to the Bethel community. While there are recent reports in national media describing the dismissal of faculty at religious institutions over Origins, it should be clear that I initiated my own resignation; I was never asked to resign from Bethel College. In fact, many Bethel leaders have been extraordinarily supportive of me throughout this lengthy process of an'iving at the Statement. Bethel has been an important part ofmy life, and remains an effective institution for its students and faculty. I hope that anyone who feels concem for me will not view support for me and the College as mutually exclusive. I’m thankful for my time here, but believe God now directs me to other ways of serving the Kingdom. I have goodwill for Bethel and pray for God's blessing on the institution. Sincerely, Ji tump, Ph.D. Department of Religion & Philosophy Statement from President Chenowethz Jim’s in?uence on our campus is signi?cant. Countless alumni and current students name Jim as one star in the constellation of their Bethel experience. I appreciate his professionalism and perspective in our many conversations throughout this complex process. I also wish to af?nn Bethel’s commitment to academic rigor within Christian context. While God certainly accepts and uses His people for great purposes regardless oftheir education, higher education intensi?es the effectiveness of the gospel in people and across the world. God clearly uses Christian colleges for strategic purposes (Acts 19:8-10). So, we will continue to love the Lord with our mind (Matthew 22:37) and explore the wonderful mystery that all things are created by God, both invisible and visible, and remain held together in Christ (Colossians 1:17). As we implement this education ministry, we proceed in con?dence that dispute is not the signpost of error. The fact is, Christian discipleship is sometimes a challenging process in taking every thought captive for Clnist (II Corinthians 10:5). We seek the blessing of God which comes from unity (Ps. 133), but do not naively demand unanimity. Looking into Fall 2015, one of Jim’s important contributions to our community has been leadership over the BUILD Honors Program. It will continue to be a robust academic landscape for students uniquely equipped for academic work. Barb Bellefeuille, Ed.D., vice president for academic services, now works with Jim and other faculty to determine an effective transition and to assign appropriate leadership for these students. In the gift of grace, Gregg Chenoweth, Ph.D. President, Bethel College P.S. Ifyou wish to read our Statement on Origins, go to BethelC0llege.edu/Believe, then click the Origins link.>> >>EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT ON ORIGINS Bethel College – Indiana June 9 , 2015 Though a very small part of a college’s curriculum, the topic of origins has become a prominent theological conversation and an important pedagogical point of clarification for evangelical Christian institutions of higher education, including Bethel College. Bethel faculty and students come from various Christian denominations, and Bethel’s Academic Freedom Policy values a wide range of scholarship projects. O n Origins, while Bethel’s affiliation with the Missionary Church supports freedom to investigate and teach a variety of scientifically legitimate theories on Origins, it sets boundaries on the doctrine of the special creation of Adam by God, which should b e advocated as the official, meritorious, and theologically responsible position of the College, without disparagement. 1. The Missionary Church’s Position Paper on Educational Philosophy upholds that the Bible (Special Revelation) reveals truth about God, h umanity, and the universe which cannot be discovered from any other source, and that General Revelation about humanity and the universe comes from observation. By observing, categorizing and experimenting with the created order, knowledge is gathered abou t God, others and the world. Therefore, the study of every facet of the universe (including humanity as related to it and responsible as stewards of it), is not only a permissible pursuit, but strongly encouraged by the Bible itself (Proverbs 25:2; Exodus 31:1 - 5; Psalm 19:1 - 6), affirmed by the Missionary Church, and necessary for skilled Christian discipleship. Therefore, Bethel faculty are affirmed to investigate everything appropriate to a Christian liberal arts college as a function of Christian discip leship (Mark 12:30; Colossians 1:16 - 18; II Corinthians 10:5). Further, Bethel College faculty are affirmed to teach any and all matters relevant to developing wisdom and Christian maturity in students, including viewpoints which the college may not hold b ut which students may face in the future. 2. The Article of Faith on Creation states, “We believe that the first man, Adam, was created by an immediate act of God and not by a process of evolution.” While faculty are supported to investigate and teach all v iewpoints on Origins, this doctrine is a corporate commitment on Adam and all humanity. This affirmation is essential to distinguish humanity from animals, as made in God’s image (Gen. 1:27; 2:7) to account for the work of Christ to atone for the represen tative sin of humanity through Adam (I Cor. 15:45), respect the genealogy of Luke 3 , account for New Testament reference s to Adam by Paul (Rom. 5:12 - 17), and others. Macro - evolution among animals is not addressed here. 3. Bethel College faculty members aff irm through contracts each year that they believe: ? God is the Creator and Sustainer of all things, and the Author of Salvation. ? The Bible is the divinely inspired, only infallible, authoritative Word of God, and the unchanging rule of faith and practice. ? Humanity’s relationship to God, which was lost through sin, is restored through faith in the redeeming work of Christ, God’s divine Son. ? The Church comprises people who are born of the Spirit and empowered by him to live a holy life devoted to the fulfill ment of the Church’s Great Commission. ? The personal return of Christ will bring about the end of the present age, the judgment and the beginning of the glorious age to come. In summary, Bethel College faculty will respectfully teach its denominational doc trine on the distinctive creation of humanity, while answering that denomination’s call to investigate everything appropriate to a Christian liberal arts college. This Statement does not intend to suppress faculty opinions about Origins, but prevent publi c contradiction or disparagement of this corporate commitment. This permits faculty to participate in academic communities which might be at variance with the Position Statement in order to learn from that community, but faculty are not to advocate for, n or hold leadership positions for, nor sustain a contractual relationship with an academic community which may be at variance with the Statement.>> I would suggest this is a faith community working through a cluster of challenging issues and seeking a fair and faithful position. In particular there is utterly no suppression of the teaching of macroevolutionary theory, though in a faith community that for cause rejects evolutionary materialism [which is self refuting and self falsifying, utterly unable to account for the responsible, morally accountable rational freedom we experience], there is a statement to the effect that The comparison made by Seversky to Nazism is outrageous, without good grounds, slanderous, and should be apologised for. KFkairosfocus
July 27, 2015
July
07
Jul
27
27
2015
03:51 AM
3
03
51
AM
PDT
Z, I notice and duly protest the invidious comparison between the Missionary Church and other Evangelicals and Nazism (which BTW pivoted on scientific racism and linked ideas tracing to Haeckel and other leading German Darwinists and their influence). That is utterly uncalled for projection and betrays a deep hostility and prejudice that smacks of bigotry and agendas that need to be exposed nd corrected. KFkairosfocus
July 27, 2015
July
07
Jul
27
27
2015
03:28 AM
3
03
28
AM
PDT
Debian, I sympathize with your points. However, it seems to me that you gloss over the fact that interpretations do change based on new data. For example, do you believe the Earth moves? Just about all Bible believers now affirm this concept, yet for many centuries it was thought that the Bible taught otherwise. In fact, a fellow named Galileo got in hot water with the Church over exactly this issue. Chapter and verse: 1 Chronicles 16:30 "Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved." Psalm 93:1 "The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved" Psalm 96:10 "Say among the heathen that the LORD reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously." Psalm 104:5 "Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever." Now you have a choice, Debian. You can say that these scriptures have changed in the last few centuries -- except they haven't -- or you can say that science has shown that the old interpretation was incorrect -- or you can claim that despite all the evidence, the Earth does not move. Or, finally, you can say those scriptures were interpreted correctly but were erroneous. Which is it?anthropic
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
08:45 PM
8
08
45
PM
PDT
testing blockquote 2
testing blockquote 3
DebianFanatic
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
07:43 PM
7
07
43
PM
PDT
mgwump3 @ 11 says
The creation week has no textual imperative for a literal week.
Yet the text repeatedly says that each day consisted of an evening and a morning. Further, each day is numbered, which almost always in the Hebrew scriptures refers to literal days. In Exodus 20:11, YHWH tells the nation of Israel to work a six-day week and rest on the seventh day, because God had created everything in six days and then rested on the seventh. Unless God changes the definition of "day" mid-breath, twice, in this passage, the day of Israel's work-week is the same as the day of Creation week. Are these arguments conclusive? No. Are they compelling? I believe so. I see no internal reason for denying that the days of Creation are not literal solar periods of approximately 24 hours each. Whether the cosmos (including humanity) came into existence in a six-day period is a separate question from what the text actually says. It is my conclusion that the text actually says "Yes", regardless of what external sources (geologists, astronomers, etc) claim. mugwump3 also writes:
Hundreds and even thousands of years may come between the "BEGATS."
Again, I see no internal evidence for this. In both the Genesis 5 and Genesis 11 chronologies, the very first generation establishes a pattern of the meaning of the age of fathering. In Gen 5:3, Adam is 130 when he fathers Seth. We know there are no skipped generations here because 4:25 tells us that Seth is born from Eve as a result of Adam "knowing" Eve. We also know that the next generation does not skip any generations, as again, chapter 4, verse 26, enlightens us that Enosh was born to Seth, and that Seth named Enosh. We see the same pattern established in the first geneology of chapter 11, verse 10, where we're told that Arpachshad was born to Shem two years after the flood, when Shem was 100 years old. These numbers mean something. There is no textual reason to assume they mean anything except what they say. The only reason to assume they mean something else is to resolve the contradiction the text has with external thinking concerning historical ages. Mapou says in 14:
Not to mention the fact that Genesis is a compilation of many different stories, records and genealogies. “Adam” in one story may not be the same as “Adam” in another.
Yes, and No. I recommend googling "tablet theory of Genesis". In short, there are internal clues that Moses compiled ancient clay tablets, written by eyewitnesses to the accounts in Genesis, into a single narrative. Moses cites these tablets as he goes, such as in Gen 5:1 wherein he reports that the material he writes here comes from "the book of the generations of Adam." Another example is that in the middle of Jacob's family records we have a "sidebar" of Esau's family records (Gen 36), just after Jacob and Esau have an opportunity to catch up on each others' lives when they meet up after years of being apart. It seems to me that most claims against the literal historicity of Genesis are motivated by attempts to "explain away" what the text actually says, rather than to simply accept the text as it is, regardless of how well it dovetails into external considerations.DebianFanatic
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
07:39 PM
7
07
39
PM
PDT
Not to mention the fact that Genesis is a compilation of many different stories, records and genealogies. "Adam" in one story may not be the same as "Adam" in another. What bothers me about YECs is how selective they are in their literal interpretations. Genesis clearly indicates that there were many Gods (the Elohim talked among themselves) who created the universe and life on earth. Later, other Elohim came down to earth because they thought we were hot. Some became gods of the other nations (Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, etc.) It clearly says that the Gods (Yahweh Elohim) regretted having created mankind. Yet, YEC doctrine is that there is only one God and he is infinitely powerful and knowledgeable. In addition, God is male and there is no female God around. What's up with that? I speak as a Christian who does not believe that salvation comes from any Church.Mapou
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
03:54 PM
3
03
54
PM
PDT
mugwump 11 Well said. One issue is that the Bible follows ancient Near Eastern textual traditions, which are not the same as modern traditions. You simply cannot translate to English and take the most natural interpretation FOR US as necessarily authoritative. Context, style, history, and intended audience are imperative considerations. For example, why does Genesis 1 talk about evening and morning as one day, rather than morning and evening? This appears aimed at refuting Egyptian religious teachings that the cosmos somehow ended when the sun went down, only to be renewed at sunrise. After all, the sun was a god! It's easy to forget that Genesis 1 was written to Jews who had been in Egypt for hundreds of years and undoubtedly had been influenced thereby. The intended audience is a crucial part of the context!anthropic
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
03:36 PM
3
03
36
PM
PDT
seversky>1..I see no difference between a Christian college such as Bethel suppressing discussion of the theory of evolution and political regimes such as the communists who suppressed any views they held to be not consonant with their ideology. Private colleges and universities have the right to teach whatever they like within the law – a freedom they probably would not grant to others if they held political power – but they forfeit any respect for their scholarship in science if what is good is decided by the clerical rather than the scientific community. ..So I assume you believe then that YECs are at least as dangerous as say Nazi's, or communists, or maybe the taliban or isis. I see hateful comparisons like this repeated over again on forum after forum and I think its a shame. Now as far as "respect for their scholarship in science" I have an honest question. how much has the theory of common descent actually contributed to true advancement in technology or science or medicine? People say that without TOE we would still be living in the dark ages, I don't buy the argument but maybe I'm wrong, so Some examples please. I really want to know.reverendspy
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
02:50 PM
2
02
50
PM
PDT
Firstly, generational history in the Bible did not presume strict back-to-back generations, thus, the attempt to date the generations is and always has been a product of a misguided understanding of lineage. Hundreds and even thousands of years may come between the "BEGATS." The purpose behind lists of generations was not to put a time stamp on the age of the universe or the planet. And, failing to differentiate between literal and allegory, modern interpretations ironically fail to understand the difference even in light of our own use of both in modern writing. Secondly, YEC is a product of a failure to understand historical writing styles. The "literal" meaning of the authors is completely different from the literal interpretations of modern pseudo-scholarship. The creation week has no textual imperative for a literal week. The days are certainly open and, indeed, conducive to an earth-centric chronology...observability paired with a sequence of events. All too often, it seems the only two options given to a believer in the inerrancy of scripture are the false YEC and the tossing out of the baby with YEC bath water...leaving the intended understanding stuck in the abyss between in the excluded middle.mugwump3
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
02:29 PM
2
02
29
PM
PDT
And it’s not a Catholic only “tradition”…
It does not matter. It's all crap. The talking snake should have been a strong clue.Mapou
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
01:57 PM
1
01
57
PM
PDT
Virgil - YEC is not the same as literally believing the earth is 6000 years old. It believes a young earth given genealogy but many do not believe we cannot derive from that the exact age of the earth. However where YECs and others disagree will be generally how long creation took - eg. 6 literal days or millions of years. It also takes a more literal interpretation of other parts of the Bible eg. death was the result of man's sin. That alone (plus Jesus' view on Adam and also the Torah and the Prophets) should cause question over the plausibility of long ages for the creation week days. This YEC is primary about the literal nature of the creation week. And it's not a Catholic only "tradition"...Dr JDD
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
01:37 PM
1
01
37
PM
PDT
Dr JDD- I wouldn't ask that as I don't think the Bible literally says the universe and earth are 6,000 years old. A 6,000 year old earth is an interpretation of the Bible.Virgil Cain
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
12:52 PM
12
12
52
PM
PDT
The 6000 year-old earth crap used to be a Catholic idea but has since become the sole property of fundamentalist Protestant Churches. However, Catholics retain a monopoly on the old doctrine according to which your sins are not forgiven until some dude in a robe who doesn't like having sex with women says so. And then you must say "thank you, father" even though the dude can't have children because, again, he hates having sex with women. The whole thing can be hilarious at times. LOL.Mapou
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
12:26 PM
12
12
26
PM
PDT
Don't worry, I'm sure the very first thing you can ask God when you stand before Him is "why did you make the universe look so old and the Bible so literal?"Dr JDD
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
12:19 PM
12
12
19
PM
PDT
Yes, the 6,000 year old earth crap is beyond the pale.Virgil Cain
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
10:13 AM
10
10
13
AM
PDT
Second, it would help if Christians for YEC groups were completely discredited, as they deserve to be.Mung
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
09:10 AM
9
09
10
AM
PDT
Seversky- No one seems to be able to find this alleged "theory of evolution" so why teach it?Virgil Cain
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
08:19 AM
8
08
19
AM
PDT
Seversky at 1, the point is that the taxpayer is not supporting them and they cannot compel non-believers to listen. Who is thought to have integrity by whomever else is quite a different matter.News
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
06:48 AM
6
06
48
AM
PDT
If an educational institution respects academic integrity then, in science, it should be teaching what is the current thinking in a given field, not what is judged to be theologically or politically acceptable. I see no difference between a Christian college such as Bethel suppressing discussion of the theory of evolution and political regimes such as the communists who suppressed any views they held to be not consonant with their ideology. Private colleges and universities have the right to teach whatever they like within the law - a freedom they probably would not grant to others if they held political power - but they forfeit any respect for their scholarship in science if what is good is decided by the clerical rather than the scientific community.Seversky
July 26, 2015
July
07
Jul
26
26
2015
06:40 AM
6
06
40
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply