Alex Gillis

Intelligent Design Peer review

The astonishing rise of junk science

Gillis’s overly respectful view of Correct science media stems from one key problem with his assumptions: He assumes that the rise of junk science is mainly due to new publishing technology. No, naturalism is the cause.

bornagain77 Seversky believes the mind to be totally material. That it... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
polistra Economic behavior is thoroughly lawful and predictable. Bubbles have been... – Physics envy is a terrible thing,...
Axel ' However, when evolutionary materialistic scientism is injected into the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Axel Indeed, it would not be harmed. The connection of the... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
bill cole GP Sequence comparisons allow us, in the right context, to... – Controlling the waves of dynamic, far...
PaV From the Quota article: The list of species groups with... – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...
Seversky John_a_designer@ 3 Subjective opinions, like Seversky’s, are not arguments. They... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Seversky So when Dr Egnor operated on a human brain he... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
john_a_designer Notice that moral subjectivists, like Seversky, must begin with the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
doubter It's interesting to me that the enterprise of ID does... – Researcher: Evidence for early man in...
kairosfocus Still going strong – Live Event: On Life in the...
kairosfocus Egnor on the evidence against materialism: Discovery Science In this... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
doubter Does this really matter much? Does hybridization or the new... – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...
kairosfocus JAD, you raise several key issues that tie into the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
kairosfocus EG, You have cross-threaded, but I will respond on the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Hugh Kenneth Jawa@659, yes, I do understand your point, and I admit... – Controlling the waves of dynamic, far...
john_a_designer Subjective opinions, like Seversky’s, are not arguments. They are just... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
LoneCycler For Sev @11 Darwin’s theory has no scientific credibility. And... – Another Darwinian mass shooting?
Ed George But Seversky was correct with his one line “Argumentum ad... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
ET Seversky: ...it would still say nothing about the theory’s scientific... – Another Darwinian mass shooting?
OLV Latemarch, Good questions. – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...