Skip to content
Monday, April 12, 2021

Uncommon Descent

Serving The Intelligent Design Community

  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Resources
    • Frequently raised but weak arguments against Intelligent Design
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Archive of Posts by Michael Behe
    • Darwinian Debating Devices
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • irrational numbers

Tag: irrational numbers

Intelligent Design Mathematics

80-year-old problem around irrational numbers solved by new proof

Scientific American: ” At 44 pages of dense, technical mathematics, even leading mathematical minds need time to wrap their heads around the paper. The community, however, seems optimistic. “

Posted on September 16, 2019September 16, 2019 Author News Comments(3)

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Donate

Help us to continue generating quality content and reliable website service.

Recent Comments

  • polistra After more thinking, I take back my criticism. If you're influential, it makes sense to stay in. Karsten is probably... – Karsten Pultz on the Church of...
  • jerry For those liberals interested in Georgia election law. So they can get up to speed. The Babylon Bee Fact-Checks 9... – Peter Boghossian on the Woke and...
  • mohammadnursyamsu The reason God is outside of science, is because the name God is defined in terms of that He makes... – Michael Egnor: Here’s why an argument...
  • mohammadnursyamsu Obviously it is subjectivity that is irrellevant to an atheist. And the logic / facts dealing with choice are also... – At Mind Matters News: Why believe...
  • ET Science only cares about reality. So it has to be able to handle the God hypothesis if that is how... – Michael Egnor: Here’s why an argument...
  • jerry Not C19 news but this could be used to monitor treatments for many diseases including advanced effects of C19 on... – BREAKING: President Trump, Mrs Trump &...
  • ET seversky is still confused as there isn't any scientific theory of evolution. The theory of evolution deals with how living... – Stephen Hawking was Sometimes Embarrassingly Stupid
  • William J Murray Seversky @10 said: Jerry did not mention the 63 lawsuits filed contesting the results of the 2020 election. That does... – Peter Boghossian on the Woke and...
  • jerry Evidence and logic are irrelevant to an atheist till they believe they have a gotcha. Then logic overrides everything no... – At Mind Matters News: Why believe...
  • polistra Why is Karsten still attending and giving money to a church that explicitly doesn't want him there, and explicitly treats... – Karsten Pultz on the Church of...
  • jerry Disingenuous and wrong nearly 100% of the time Jerry did not mention the 63 lawsuits Jerry did not say anything... – Peter Boghossian on the Woke and...
  • bornagain77 Seversky states, However much you believe otherwise, the theory of evolution says nothing about human beings or any other animals... – Stephen Hawking was Sometimes Embarrassingly Stupid
  • polistra Good point. Maybe the effect should be renamed, since cocktail parties were never a typical experience for most humans. Filtering... – From Hugh Ross: Language involves biological...
  • BobRyan Bob O'H: To say something should exist is very different from having witnessed something. If something is not witnessed and... – Michael Egnor: Here’s why an argument...
  • Bob O'H We never observe black holes just as we never can observe the Big Bang. We can only infer — by... – Michael Egnor: Here’s why an argument...
  • Karen McMannus chuckdarwin: That it may have originally evolved in aquatic vs. terrestrial fauna is more significant. However, it is not clear... – Would you believe… that the brain-eye...
  • Querius Seversky @17, Third, Christians are only able to hold a consistent set of beliefs about their faith by ignoring significant... – Stephen Hawking was Sometimes Embarrassingly Stupid
  • Querius Seversky @16, The only people here who "pontificate" are those who make completely unsupported assertions under the assumption that their... – Stephen Hawking was Sometimes Embarrassingly Stupid
  • Querius Eukaryotic microorganisms are extremely successful and supposedly are far more evolved than most other organisms on the planet. They react... – At Scientific American: Why we live...
  • Querius In science, a strong theory is able to anticipate findings in future research, a poor theory has lousy predictive ability... – Would you believe… that the brain-eye...
  • Pearlman arrogance and confirmation bias, a winning combo to help retard science. why so many Hi IQ 'experts' are the biggest... – Karsten Pultz on the Church of...
Copyright © 2021 Uncommon Descent. All rights reserved.
Theme: Newspaper Plus by ThemeCentury. Powered by WordPress.