John Ioannidis
Statistician Ioannidis on how COVID wrecked science
One of those rare instances where science is self-correcting … Ioannidis is vindicated
The high costs of scam science
COVID 19: John Ioannidis, scourge of trashy science studies, responds to critics
Ioannidis, the opponent of bad science studies, risks Unpersonhood
At STAT: Ioannidis’ differing COVID-19 views shouldn’t be demonized
Fake stats debunker Ioannidis on COVID-19 stats: Not reliable
Another well-earned jab at “nutrition science”
Alex Berezow sticks another fork in nutrition science, courtesy John Ioannidis: Dr. Ioannidis has gone on to show that the best scientists don’t always get funded, why neuroscience is unreliable, why most clinical research is useless, and that most economics studies are exaggerated. In other words, the process by which we acquire new knowledge is fundamentally flawed and much of what we think we know is wrong. Dr. Ioannidis is not just a bull in a china shop; he’s a bazooka in a china shop. … Here at ACSH, we have been saying for a long time that nutrition research is shoddy and mostly wrong. The reason is inherent to the way research is conducted in the field: Too much Read More ›
Evidence-based medicine “hijacked,” says top researcher
From Retraction Watch, interviewing John Ioannidis, John Ioannidis is perhaps best known for a 2005 paper “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” One of the most highly cited researchers in the world, Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford, has built a career in the field of meta-research. Earlier this month, he published a heartfelt and provocative essay in the the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology titled “Evidence-Based Medicine Has Been Hijacked: A Report to David Sackett.” In it, he carries on a conversation begun in 2004 with Sackett, who died last May and was widely considered the father of evidence-based medicine. We asked Ioannidis to expand on his comments in the essay, including why he believes he is a “failure.” Retraction Read More ›