Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

UD Live Event from Nov 3, US Election cont’d: BBC — yes the BEEB — on BLM’s Marxist founders, “[We] fought to change history and we won”

Categories
Control vs Anarchy
Defending our Civilization
Geo-strategic issues
News Highlights
Politics
rhetoric
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Okay, we are looking at the victory lap being taken (a bit prematurely, methinks) by the BLM trio of marxist founders. Here is BEEB:

Black Lives Matter founders: We fought to change history and we won

Published14 hours ago

The year 2020 will be remembered for a lot of things – not least the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement around the world.

The organisation has led huge street rallies and high-profile campaigns against racism and police brutality.

Now the three women who founded the movement have told the BBC they believe it has transformed politics.

“Black people alongside our allies stood up to change the course of history and we won,” said Alicia Garza.

Garza and her BLM co-founders, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi, spoke as part of the BBC 100 Women Masterclass 2020, a digital live event of masterclasses, big interviews and guests on 30 November.

If you doubted that this is a Marxism-driven, colour-culture revolution push using Critical Race Theory as key ideological wedge, there you have it from the horses’ mouths.

In short, 4th Gen War:

. . . based on colour/cultural revolution insurgency, including dirty form McFaul programme election manipulation:

Okie, Dec 17, I clip from 1333 below, a focal point:

Just remember, given the realities of 4th gen war, there is now no hard border — no specific, momentous declaratory threshold — between

a: information and influence operations [including, too often “education”];

b: politics, law and power balances stratagems, and

c: full bore high kinetics war.

The intent of all three in ruthless hands, subjugation under a new lawless oligarchy, demands that we understand that tri-polar spectrum, and that we determine to stand for a civilisation of truth, right, honour and liberty in the face of its most insidious, treacherous enemies.

H’mm, Dec 15, let’s add in the Overton Window (with hints of Plato’s Parable of the Cave), to help us understand political/policy thinking in light of BATNA points:

Where, we need to ponder the change challenge:

. . . and the Mountains/pillars of influence mapping model:

Where are we drifting to, why and how?

Now, let us continue the already in progress [for four weeks!] live event . . . from here.

First U/D, the Arizona hearing when I can get it up.

Meanwhile, ponder just what is being said now, and what it implies beyond how they would wish it spun, given their admitted Marxism. BREAKING, CONTINUING (AFTER FOUR WEEKS) . . .

U/D1: Arizona hearings:

https://youtu.be/QfC2T7UpxkI

U/D2: Ms Powell with Mr Dobbs on state of play, a case in VA on the table. Also, even as a restraining order was being debated in a see-saw back-forth, in Fulton County, a Server was taken by a technician on excuse of software update and has disappeared from chain of custody. From CA, a tape has been forwarded to Ms Powell and reveals 550 votes from 270 people, an indication of algorithmic manipulation:

Ms Powell, the entire FBI and Dept of Justice need to be hosed out with Chlorox and firehoses.

F/N: Was the Electoral College simply a way to entrench slavery — merely ramshackle defence of slavery? A discussion on republic vs direct instant effect democracy:

[PREDICTABLY, SADLY, CENSORED]

U/D2, Dec 2, hearings in MI:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKgw

U/D3, Dec 2: HT BA77, we now have chain of custody on ballots going into PA by the trailer-load. The ballots seen coming in at wee hours were in similar containers:

U/D4, Dec 2: Spykman’s framework of heartland, rimland and the outer crescent of maritime Islands and continents:

This is the framework for geostrategic analysis. Desperately compressed, c 1904 Mackinder identified that rail, telegraph, telephone etc allowed mobilisation of continental resources in the heart of the Eurasian landmass that would counterweight the maritime powers, i.e. Britain with the US coming up behind. C20 can be viewed as the history of two German grabs and one Russian one, failed. Rimlands are a belt between, coast and near hinterlands. The outer arc is where maritime power and sea trade dominate. Thus, the chief maritime power guarantees global stability.

I have argued as follows c April 2016, the current US 4th gen civil war with global entanglement is a playing out of this picture. Notice the Iranian push, vulture no. 3. No Ko is a wannabe:

U/D5, Dec 2, Ordinary people have their say (and often get smeared by the media dominant narrative — a comment):

Hannity shows ordinary witnesses.Twitter so no YT link.

U/D6, Dec 4: Here is the Oct 2016 video of independent body blackbox voting dot org:

Note, from commented screen captures:

U/D7, Mr Giuliani requests disciplinary action for defamation violation of parliamentary privilege, regarding dismissal of evidence and attacking his professional integrity:

In the course of this he corrects widespread talking points: 3 cases brought not the 39 being talked about. 2,000 affidavits under penalty of law, and we know now of the video of four suitcases of ballots counted after scrutineers were dismissed, being told that counting was over for the night, in GA.

The member signalling intent to dox and harass a witness by demanding even her maiden name should take due note.

U/D8, Dec 5: Smoking gun? (Video here.) The midnight, unsupervised ballot counting in GA — though strictly, the count from its outset with scrutineers corralled, was invalid:

U/D9, Dec 7, concerns that Dominion machines have flipped votes and on a test run a sequestered machine has continued to do so:

Cf. Expert testimony:

https://youtu.be/ijtaV5Twf6o

Cybersecurity expert, Russell Ramsland is speaking under the umbrella of his affidavit.

U/D, Dec 10, Lou Dobbs on the “Russian intelligence”/ “conspiracy theory” dismissive talking points on Mr Hunter Biden (with implications that his chief asset on offer was access) and Ms Powell’s unleashing of the Kracken:

https://youtu.be/IQjjjrR9QUY

[PREDICTABLY, CENSORED]

U/D11, Dec 11: Here is a framework for addressing media spin and gaslighting, agit-prop etc:

As it is such a glaring example on what was said in the “fine people” remarks, and as Sandy brought it up, let me add this correction from the record . . . yes, transcript, on Charlottesville:

U/D13, Dec 12, here is a backgrounder on Alcibiades which also gives a useful survey of the Peloponnesian war. One hopes, this will not be censored:

U/D14, Dec 12 HT BA77, Dominion demonstrations, part 1:

. . . and part 2:

5:04 on in this part 2 shows scanning in then voting a BLANK ballot, which the operator says “totally bothers me.”

She demonstrates also how adjudicated ballots can be voted.

We separately know that the scanner can mark ballots, sold as a feature for the visually impaired.

In short there is now no responsible doubt that the sort of manipulation discussed is a real capability — means. Frustration of scrutineering creates opportunity and decisively undermines integrity of the election vote counts. Motive is easy, power in the midst of a 4th Gen Civil war, in the form of a colour-culture revolution push, theme colour black. The testimony of many witnesses, statistical red flags etc point to actual occurrence, but recall, this is secondary. The primary issue is massive injection of effectively uncontrolled mail in ballots with 3rd party ballot harvesting and similar frustration of scrutineering implying dubious chain of custody.

All of this then points to the 26 years of history going back to the PA case of 1994 and through the exposure of election gadgetry since the early 2000’s, then rejections by CA and TX as well as links to Venezuela and more.

I strongly suggest, download the videos for yourself before they vanish into the censorship black hole.

U/D15: Hima’s testimony, something needs to be fixed here:

U/D16, Dec 13: I think it is profitable to look at a backgrounder on Mountains/pillars of influence, dominant worldviews and agendas, the change challenge and the crooked yardstick effect. First, the seven mountains, a mapping model for dealing with a corrupt culture as a remnant of soundness under God (originally, Schaeffer et al, 1970’s):

Linked, the Machiavelli change-timing challenge:

Underlying problem: crooked yardsticks vs plumb-lines:

Deeper background, a sounder view on political spectrum:

Further deeper understanding of an en-darkened civilisation, adapting Schaeffer’s vision:

Our civilisation is at obvious kairos, a hinge of history, with major dangers and opportunities. It is time to be good people of the remnant in the face of an Ac 27 storm.

U/D17, Dec 14, Ms Powell on the state of the American Courts and Republic on a date that most likely will live in infamy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKfK8jkSwPA

(Has this ALREADY been censored?)

Lou Dobbs with Ms Powell:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGEmSMLgVeY

U/D18, Dec 16: A summary of the lesson of 1876/77, on the price paid for a devil’s bargain that swallowed electoral fraud:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbSgCpPors

Yes, the Democrats refused to acknowledge fraud and a devil’s bargain was struck over 20 electors that stopped Reconstruction in a way that opened up the abuses that lingered to the 1960’s.

U/D19, Dec 19: a summary of red flags from the Navarro Report, so we can see in the context of being an evidence summary:

U/D20: The “Solar Winds” Cyber attack, apparently in progress for 6 months, with direct entanglement with the tainted election (cf. 17:00 on):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=869&v=3T9VDichLPM&feature=youtu.be

[predictably, poof!]

China is named, along with Iran and North Korea. As well as, of course, Russia having been widely deemed suspect no. 1. This is an obvious example of an information-influence operation as act of 4G war, connecting the local civil conflict in the US to the global conflict, de facto WW4. Forbes comments:

The recently discovered cyber attacks against numerous U.S. government departments and  thousands of public and private sector entities around the world, via a compromise of SolarWinds software, underscore the risks associated with third party vendors and raise questions about liability. The attacks were allegedly perpetrated by Russia and were highly sophisticated . . . .

The attackers compromised the software “signature” of SolarWinds’s Orion network monitoring software and distributed malware as a software update. Public and private encryption keys are used to “sign” software. A software update is “signed” using an encryption algorithm and the developer’s private key, which creates a hash “signature.”  This “signature” is validated by the receiver of the software update by using the sender’s public key. The signature process assures the integrity of the update and instills trust in users of the software. 

In a December 14 SEC filing, SolarWinds said that of its more than 300,000 customers, they believed that less than 18,000 entities may have downloaded the Orion update during the March-June 2020 timeframe [–> the 6 months timeline], which likely included the malware. The malware operated stealthily and exfiltrated valuable intellectual property, confidential and proprietary data, emails, and other valuable information from victims’ systems. It was unknown until prominent cybersecurity firm FireEye, also a victim of the attacks, discovered the malware and reported on the attacks on December 13, 2020.

According to FireEye, once installed in a system, the malware remained quiet for a couple of weeks and then masqueraded as the Orion Improvement Program protocol. It stored data from its internal activities within actual SolarWinds files on the system, thereby making its detection all the more difficult.  The malware had highly credentialed access to the system and could disable system services, reboot machines, exfiltrate data, execute files, change system configurations, and perform actions usually taken by a highly privileged system administrator.

That sounds rather familiar, and illustrates what happens if a trusted supplier is compromised. Gen Flynn’s remarks at 16:05 on are worth transcribing:

When we talk about our election security . . . I think this is all part of it, because there is a relationship between this solar winds attack; which has basically penetrated our entire critical infrastructure as well as our election security. So we have to look at everything we’re doing . . . okay with all of the egregious behaviour that we’ve seen on our election security we cannot stand for foreign influence, which we have direct evidence of foreign influence. We also have direct evidence now from other countries, from other foreign partners who have evidence.

In fact they were watching the attacks on our election system, on our election process on the 3rd of November and they are willing to provide that directly to the President.

So we now have that evidence and have received that today. It’s very important.

So there are foreign partners and allies that are willing to help us with our election security and this Solar Winds system is really really dangerous and more has to be done.

The likely allies obviously include Israel, likely Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and possibly Australia given the focus on China.

Again, we are back to whose report do you believe, why.

U/D21, Dec 23: It was not possible to find the 1984 Movie through a Google search (yes, they are that unconscious of the irony) but DDG showed it, here is a colour version at YT, this may be pretty important holiday viewing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl4kt4kUE88

If that gets purged, here is Web Archive.

U/D22, Dec 28: Understand the anger of the perpetually manipulated:

One does not have to endorse the above across the board to see that it has a telling point or two about the “Uniparty” and the issue of fundamentally unaccountable elites, leading a manipulated march of folly. Here, the lesson of Ac 27 is again all too relevant.

U/D23: A Canadian Lawyer and an American Lawyer discuss — as an example — the dismissal of the Wisconsin care; an example of how the election fraud concerns are being sidelined:

U/D24, Jan 3, what the Ukrainians have to say about corruption and investigation, through an Interfax press conference. Such needs to be soberly addressed in detail:

Comments
Thanks Silver Asiatic, I've been using duckduckgo to get around Google censors, but I will try ecosia now, I bookmarked it, election worker Georgia scanned ballots 5 times https://www.ecosia.org/search?q=election+worker+Georgia+scanned+ballots+5+timesbornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:24 PM
5
05
24
PM
PST
Ruby Freeman. She deleted her Facebook page and will not give interviews at the moment.Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:23 PM
5
05
23
PM
PST
Siver Asiatic: If I was her, and everything I did was 100% legitimate, I’d be on every public media source giving full details of the explanation. You are such a hypocrite. You over and over and over again criticise public media and then say that's how someone should defend themselves? You don't even make sense. I think all the people accused should wait until they have their chance in an actual court of law to defend themselves. Listening to the recording of the phone call I had no idea that The Donald was so completely looney. Listen to the whole thing. He's way off the deep end. It's scary. "Ultimately, I win." -- The Donald. Sounds like who?JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:21 PM
5
05
21
PM
PST
ANOTHER VIDEO of Corrupt GA Election Workers Feeding SAME BALLOTS Through Machines Numerous Times!
I watched a close-up of that video where the election worker took the stack, looked around to see if anyone was watching, and placed it (without any inspection) back into the feeder ... and repeated that process 5 times with the same stack. The outrage I experienced at that was very mild compared to what people were saying in the comments. That election worker must be fearing for her life right now. If I was her, and everything I did was 100% legitimate, I'd be on every public media source giving full details of the explanation. (Google's suppression of information is starting to get real for me ... a search of "election worker Georgia scanned ballots 5 times" doesn't pull up one of the videos. Switching to ecosia.com and there are dozens, with the videos. Bye Google. We had a nice time together. Have a good life.)Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:12 PM
5
05
12
PM
PST
Bornagain77: whether a phone call is legitimate or not The phone call is real. The recording is real. Listen to the lengthy rantings from Trump. He's just bought every unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. And this is the real point: I've been told over and over and over again that I have a responsibility to uphold proper reasoning and behaviour. Which I take to mean that all evidence and data should be scrutinised and examined and considered. And when accusing people of crimes the principle of innocent until proven (in a court of law) guilty should be upheld. But what I see on this site over and over again is acceptance of unproven claims and accusations. I see assumption of guilt without the accused being given a chance in a court of law of defending themselves. The President accuses the Georgia officials of being children. About 27 minutes in. He's rude, insulting and incoherent. It's pretty clear that the reason this recording was released was because the officials concerned wanted to document the intimidation the Trumpster was bringing to them. HE initiated the call. HE brought the challenge. HE's making claims: I won the state by hundreds of thousands of votes. "This isn't social media, this is Trump media." -- The Donald. "You will find many forgeries. You know that." -- The Donald. Listen to the call. After many minutes of accusing the Georgia officials of being corrupt and lying he then asked for them just to find enough votes to change the results. Pathetic. 41 minutes in . . . The Donald is just looney. Flailing around. Repeating whatever accusation he can. Really sad in fact.JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:06 PM
5
05
06
PM
PST
JVL, who denied the Ruby Freeman video was real, then who denied that he denied that the Ruby Freeman video was real, may not be the best person to judge whether a phone call is legitimate or not, :) Just saying,,, :)bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:52 PM
4
04
52
PM
PST
Seversky, imploring an official to face evidence of a tainted election is not "importuning a state government official to falsify the results of an election." That, i/l/o abundant and decisive evidence, much of which was outlined in the opening minutes of the call, reflecting what was presented in testimony Dec 31 etc, is slanderous distortion. This is a disputed election and there is good reason to regard the GA SoS and other claims about a wonderful, high credibility election as long since shown to be false. It seems, there will be a showdown on the 6th, and the question going forward is whether Constitutional backstops will be used or whether you face the consequences of an unconquered Western people being presented with an existential threat. The latter seems increasingly likely, and will have even worse geostrategic consequences than are already inevitable. That is, this is not merely a local American dispute. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:48 PM
4
04
48
PM
PST
Kairosfocus: Do these folks realise the fire they are playing with? Listen to the recording of the call with Trump. Do you realise the lunacy you are supporting? 10 minutes in and he's already repeating allegations after allegations that have NOT been legally established. He's not interrupted or contradicted at first; they just let him go on and on and on. And where is Uncle Rudi? He seems to have fled the sinking ship. Where is the Kraken? Gone back to his lair? Sidney Powell? Gone it seems. JVL, it is clear that BBC et al have for considerable time indulged in distortive framing and a comparison with the leaked call instantly shows this. I'm listening to the crazy ranting on the call. It's not just the BBC; Trump is way over the edge now. He's just flailing about trying to get people to believe him. Again, what was the point of the call? The Georgia officials have publicly stated many times that they support their reported election results. Why did Trump make the call? Why try and intimidate them? "It's just not possible to have lost Georgia." -- President Trump Sounds like every other denialist I've ever dealt with. I cannot be wrong.JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:45 PM
4
04
45
PM
PST
JVL, it is clear that BBC et al have for considerable time indulged in distortive framing and a comparison with the leaked call instantly shows this. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:41 PM
4
04
41
PM
PST
Isn't importuning a state government official to falsify the results of an election a criminal offense?Seversky
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:36 PM
4
04
36
PM
PST
Bornagain77: Only someone who is interested in generating a fake liberal spin, instead of ‘getting to the truth’, would leak this totally legitimate phone call to the very biased Washington Post, especially when Pulitzer is currently being blocked, most likely, exactly by Raffensperger and company from examining the ballots in question. If it's totally legitimate then why are several (as of now) news sources saying the President is threatening Raffensperger and throwing his weight around? If it's totally legitimate then what's the harm in releasing it? You really are in full Trump-apologetic mode now. Raffensperger has gone on the public record several times upholding the election results, standing by them despite all the abuse and threats he has personally received. So what was the point of the phone call?JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:36 PM
4
04
36
PM
PST
BA77, cf 1900 above on acts of the guilty mind and probative value. The point on shredding 3k lb of ballots would more than cover the 18 - 30k estimated in the four suitcase like containers rolled out from the black shrouded table after people were obviously sent home. The 18 k is based on magnified slow motion scans, per same call. This seems to be yet another twisted report of a legitimate call that led with recounting of issues and evidence, clearly tied to the Dec 31 hearing that was obviously widely suppressed. Do these folks realise the fire they are playing with? One begins to wonder if they are under SMICE control. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:36 PM
4
04
36
PM
PST
U/D 9:30+ shredding of 3,000 lb of ballots, as report to WH "today." Fulton County and other areas. Similarly, things with machines. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:27 PM
4
04
27
PM
PST
To give you a clue how biased Raffensperger actually is, instead of making sure Pulitzer got the Ballots that he is authorized to get via the Georgia Legislature, Raffensperger's team instead leaks the phone call with President trump to the Washington Post, a newspaper whose liberal bias surpasses even that of the NYT. Raffensperger’s Team Leaks President Trump’s Saturday Call to Fake News WaPo — Tells You Everything About the Dirty Georgia Leadership By Jim Hoft Published January 3, 2021 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/raffenspergers-team-leaks-president-trumps-saturday-call-fake-news-wapo-tells-everything-dirty-georgia-leadership/ And if you listen to the actual phone call, you can tell the phone call was totally legitimate. President Trump listed many instances where questionable votes were cast that would easily give him the victory in Georgia. And then asked them to just find the votes out of the many instances of questionable votes that he listed. Audio: Trump’s full Jan. 2 call with Ga. secretary of state https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/audio-trumps-full-jan-2-call-with-ga-secretary-of-state/2021/01/03/3f9426f4-7937-4718-8a8e-9d6052001991_video.html Only someone who is interested in generating a fake liberal spin, instead of 'getting to the truth', would leak this totally legitimate phone call to the very biased Washington Post in order to generate a fake spin, especially when Pulitzer is currently being blocked, most likely, exactly by Raffensperger and company from examining the ballots in question. In short, Raffensperger has been the main person blocking transparency in Georgia from the get go.,, i.e. He is a particularly sleezy swamp creature!bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:21 PM
4
04
21
PM
PST
Kairosfocus: JVL, that is a matter of adverse framing by suppression of context of undermining election integrity with material scale that would affect outcome . . . Kindly go to OP and address the dirty form McFaul Colour revolution recipe and the SOCOM insurgency escalator in further light of 4th generation war. What is wrong with you? I'm merely passing on a news item that no one else had brought to this thread. I don't need any retraining in proper thinking. You need to start addressing the implications of a US President driven to threatening a Republican state-level elected official who has dealt with huge amounts of online abuse from Trump supporters for his stance. What does that say about the President and his supporters? Speaking of that particular news story, it's also been reported by NPR:
An angry President Trump pushed Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, to overturn the state's presidential election result and appeared to at least partly blame Raffensperger for what could be lower turnout in Tuesday's runoff elections, which will decide control of the U.S. Senate, according to a recording of a phone call obtained by Georgia Public Broadcasting. "The people of Georgia know that this was a scam, and because of what you've done to the president, a lot of people aren't going out to vote [in the runoffs]," Trump said in the remarkable Saturday call. "A lot of Republicans are going to vote negative because they hate what you did to the president." He added: "You would be respected if this thing could be straightened out before the election."
"All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state," Trump stated at one point. "Flipping the state is a great testament to our country. It's a testament that they can admit to a mistake. A lot of people think it wasn't a mistake, it was much more criminal than that. But it's a big problem in Georgia, and it's not a problem that's going away."
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/03/953012128/this-was-a-scam-in-recorded-call-trump-pushed-official-to-overturn-georgia-vote May I just point out that this story comes from a recording, not from hearsay or an unnamed source. The quotes given in the reporting are accurate quotes from the Trumpster.JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:18 PM
4
04
18
PM
PST
F/N: A 1 hr call is here, with context of facts on the table from outset; https://www.bitchute.com/embed/9Uf09O5ufNon/ He for example emphasises people turned away as already voted. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:13 PM
4
04
13
PM
PST
BA77, my only interest to hear from the GA SoS is that he has turned the Fulton County midnight ballots over per resolution of the Judicial subcommittee resolution and they have undergone kinematic artifact scans, with scrutineered results of said scan. Stonewalling, concealment or shredding at this point are simply acts of the guilty mind that further reinforce the balance of plausibilities, as I noted in 1900 above. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:49 PM
3
03
49
PM
PST
JVL, that is a matter of adverse framing by suppression of context of undermining election integrity with material scale that would affect outcome. The issue is not someone clinging to power by twisting a legitimate outcome but exposure of fraud. Kindly go to OP and address the dirty form McFaul Colour revolution recipe and the SOCOM insurgency escalator in further light of 4th generation war. That has been my explicit context for weeks, and it is a key background for de-spinning what is going on in the information battlespace. Notice, for cause, BBC has long since lost its status of old; and I say that as someone raised up with the morning BBC news as the reference standard for world news. Those days are long gone. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:44 PM
3
03
44
PM
PST
JVL, I will tell you and Raffensperger exactly where to find the votes Timeline of the late night vote dump, (after all counting had supposedly stopped, and after all poll watchers and TV crews were told to leave), is mentioned towards the end of this following video: ANOTHER VIDEO of Corrupt GA Election Workers Feeding SAME BALLOTS Through Machines Numerous Times! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341551177146757121bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:38 PM
3
03
38
PM
PST
BA77, I did a web search and came across a manual, ver. 5.11-CO::3, dated US style as May 31 2019. It clearly says on p. 32 of 63 [enumerated, 28] that
"CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENT AND SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS The following facilities, furnishings, fixtures, and utilities are required at the central count location for the operation of the ImageCast Central scanner . . . . High speed (100 Mbps) network infrastructure and cabling (if additional central ballot scan repository/data center is used) NOTE: All computers used for election operations must be isolated from any connection to the Internet, as well as from any connection to jurisdiction computers that are not used for election operations. The election computing network must be isolated from all other networks."
Thus, the machines are designed for network access, with onward connectivity to the Internet, here 100 Mb/s for these Colorado machines. The disclaimer clearly is a case of, we made it, you make sure 'net is not set up. That, is a user choice and can be subverted even if made in good faith by officials by simply providing a wireless access point on the network. This is yet another point for proper election scrutineering, which was deliberately frustrated at relevant sites. Thus, frustration of scrutineering was and is a smoking gun, act of the guilty mind, issue. In context, it is worth noting that, several times, vote decrements and switches were seen all the way down to the level of TV Network feeds. Proper scrutineering would give us a backstop on that. But the fundamental issue is that votes in context are inherently integers and normally would only be added to under scrutineer control. The emergency of an error requiring decrement should be under even tighter scrutiny. While I am sat it, ranked choice voting and fractional ballot counts have been separately documented, e.g. in the context of the inspection of the Antrim County machines software that has also been hyperskeptically sidelined. This does convert votes into rationals. That should only be done for secondary variables, there should be indelible log control on vote tallies. And yes, we see how media feed vote tallies were in some noted cases calculated from percentages yielding fractions. That is itself a smoking gun on breakdown of respect for what a vote is and how it should be handled. When that was pointed out in exchanges, it was clear that the integrity consideration did not register. Yet again, we see how the gadgetry based election system would fail benchmarking against how a run of the mill coop bank handles cash and accounts. The alternatives now on the table are to revert to constitutional backstops that operate on the weight of evidence [a political game with a proposed 10 day audit will not do] or face the reality of a revolutionary situation getting out of control. Destroying the integrity of elections is playing with nuclear fire. On that, I note that the proposed House rule change is NOT a matter of respect or undoing prior oppressive patriarchy and "binary" -- funny how being male or female is now regarded as oppression rather than a genetically stamped fact of life -- but of imposing orwellian totalitarian control. In a context where our complementary sexes, marriage and family are foundational to civilisation. This is anticivilisational misanthropy. And it is a sign of how radical those now running victory laps over their anticipated seizure of power are. There is more than enough evidence that we face a cliff's edge situation. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:35 PM
3
03
35
PM
PST
US President Donald Trump has been recorded telling Georgia's top election official to "find" enough votes to overturn the election result. "I just want to find 11,780 votes," Mr Trump told Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in a recording released by the Washington Post. Mr Raffensperger is heard replying that Georgia's results were correct.
In the excerpts released by Washington Post, Mr Trump can be heard alternately cajoling and pressurising Georgia's secretary of state. He insisted that he had won the election in Georgia and told Mr Raffensperger that there was "nothing wrong with saying you have recalculated". Mr Raffensperger responded by saying: "The challenge you have Mr President is that the data you have is wrong." Later in the call Mr Trump said the rumour was that ballots had been shredded and voting machinery had been removed from Fulton County in the state - a charge Mr Raffensperger's lawyer said was not the case.
The president then threatened the official with possible legal consequences. "You know what they did and you're not reporting it. That's a criminal offence. You can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer," Mr Trump said. He then called for the extra 11,780 votes - which would have given him a total of 2,473,634 votes in the state, one more than Mr Biden, who received 2,473,633 votes. He told Mr Raffensperger he should re-examine the result in the state. "You can re-examine it, but re-examine it with people who want to find answers, not people who don't want to find answers," he said. "Mr President, you have people who submit information and we have our people that submit information and then it comes before the court and the court has to make a determination," Mr Raffensperger replied. "We have to stand by our numbers, we believe our numbers are right." On Sunday Mr Trump tweeted that Mr Raffensperger had not given details of the fraud the president alleges. "He has no clue!" the president tweeted. Mr Raffensperger tweeted back: "Respectfully, President Trump: What you're saying is not true. The truth will come out."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-55524838JVL
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:34 PM
3
03
34
PM
PST
as to: "is more interested in generating headlines and keeping the fraud story running than they are in finding the truth",,, Hmmm, interesting claim seeing that the Dims are the ones who are consistently stonewalling having the machines and ballots looked at. For instance, the Legislature Judicial subcommittee of Georgia voted unanimously to let Jovan Pulitzer examine the ballots, yet 'Georgia officials' have blocked him having access. Why? Are they not concerned with "finding the truth"?
Timeline of the late night vote dump, (after all counting had supposedly stopped, and after all poll watchers and TV crews were told to leave), is mentioned towards the end of this following video: ANOTHER VIDEO of Corrupt GA Election Workers Feeding SAME BALLOTS Through Machines Numerous Times! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1341551177146757121
And again, why are ‘officials’ in Georgia blocking access to these ballots from Jovan Pulitzer forensically examining them?,,, who happens to have the unanimous permission from the Georgia Judicial subcommittee to examine these ballots in question. Again, these are not the actions of innocent people trying to clear their name but are the actions of guilty people trying to cover their tracks! Of related note, Jovan Pulitzer just uploaded a new video Clearly these machines are designed for gigabit Internet access. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8ZiEEa95Pobornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:53 PM
1
01
53
PM
PST
is more interested in generating headlines and keeping the fraud story running than they are in finding the truth
Keeping the fraud story running is the only way we will be able to find the truth. As it stands, nobody would know about the issues raised so far without the publicity that was generated. If the relatively simple process of counting votes and then assigning them incrementally to the correct candidate can be so broken that huge swings in totals occur during the process, perhaps there is something that should be investigated - regardless of the outcome.
“We scanned 113,130 as of moments ago, we’ve adjudicated 106,000 plus [93.7 percent] of those,” he can be seen saying in a video clip. “The only ballots that are adjudicated are if we have a ballot with a contest on it in which there’s some question as to what, how the computer reads it. So the vote review panel then determines voter intent.”
The election official explains that 94% of those ballots had to be adjudicated because of a contest or question about voter intent, and it was left up to the review panel to determine it.Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:15 PM
1
01
15
PM
PST
Regarding the imposition of language changes, Mrs. Pelosi explains why:
[to] honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/1121l
The old rules, supposedly, did not "honor all gender identities" so new rules were created to force this social change on the American people and attack our cultural heritage.
RULES CHANGES FOR THE 117TH CONGRESS HONORS ALL GENDER IDENTITIES Changes pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral or removes references to gender, as appropriate, to ensure we are inclusive of all Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners and their families - including those who are nonbinary
"nonbinary"Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
12:54 PM
12
12
54
PM
PST
Indeed, Es, it's almost as if the motley crew giuliani and team put together for their tour of state legislatures is more interested in generating headlines and keeping the fraud story running than they are in finding the truthorthomyxo
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
12:41 PM
12
12
41
PM
PST
2000Viola Lee
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
12:30 PM
12
12
30
PM
PST
@Orthomyxo-1998
Had a quick look at this “vote decrement” claim. The claim includes about 17,000 votes being removed from Trump in Dougherty county. In 2016, that county went 23k v 10k to Clinton. In 2020 it went 25k v 10k to Biden. If Trump really lost 17k votes there it must be one of the largest swings to Trump and largest increases in turnout in the whole country…. Or maybe the starting point of 20k trump vote was just a bunch error that was corrected?
This is a very good observation. On the other hand, what's up with a system that can have such "mistakes" made and why should we have confidence in it? I was wondering why, when they showed the slide with the "outliers"/"flags" (e.g.: x districts w/ 10 )% and 1 district with 75%, they didn't show a comparison with the same districts from 2016.es58
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
12:01 PM
12
12
01
PM
PST
Had a quick look at this "vote decrement" claim. The claim includes about 17,000 votes being removed from Trump in Dougherty county. In 2016, that county went 23k v 10k to Clinton. In 2020 it went 25k v 10k to Biden. If Trump really lost 17k votes there it must be one of the largest swings to Trump and largest increases in turnout in the whole country.... Or maybe the starting point of 20k trump vote was just a bunch error that was corrected?orthomyxo
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
11:19 AM
11
11
19
AM
PST
AC, The clause people are so worked up about just lists all the relationships that would constitute nepotism of the relative benifits from a congressperson's position. So you're right, the changes don't force anyone to change their language or alter the meaning of the clause.orthomyxo
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
10:52 AM
10
10
52
AM
PST
Silver Asiatic/1969
I was trying to help someone in a social situation recently and pointed to the information counter and said “she really has a lot of information and can help you”. The girl at the info desk frowned at me and said “I’m a they”. Ok, it’s bad enough that she’s confused about her sexuality and identity, but she’s butchering the language and grammar. And I am forced to accept it for no rational reason.
I have no problem with addressing someone by their preferred pronoun out of respect for their wishes. My understanding is that the legislation is prescribing a more gender-neutral vocabulary for use in official documents, nothing more. I would certainly oppose any Orwellian diktat that tried to enforce some sort of government-approved language on all of us.Seversky
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
10:52 AM
10
10
52
AM
PST
1 2 3 4 … 69