WD400: selection favors malfunctioning proteins, so what?
WD400: Selection can sometimes favour mutations that break existing proteins. OK, so what? Comment, If not Rupe So what? 😯 1. if selection can select in favor of breaking of proteins, so why then do we presume selection favors creation of proteins? 2. selection can select against breaking of proteins, but that would be no proof selection was involved in the creation of the protein (see: Selection falsely called a mechanism when it should be called an outcome. A proteins necessity for survival does not mean selection was the mechanism of protein creation. 3. selection is mostly irrelevant to creation of new proteins (since most molecular evolution is free of selection) (see: Most evolution is free of selection, therefore Darwinism Read More ›
Peer review: Key journals published molecular biology papers with altered data?
Epigenetic differences between humans and chimps (vs. 98% similarity claims)
Convergent evolution of turtle shells?
Human sacrifice from over five thousand years ago?
Pop science news: Entangled wormholes could unite lovers separated by centuries?
William Murray, here’s the latest scholarly assault on free will
Stolen Obligations: Why do atheists care about truth, reason or morality?
Truth, rationality, and morality under naturalism, are irrelevant commodities, in and of themselves. The naturalist’s (atheistic materialist’s) concern with truth, reason and morality are stolen obligations – obligations that are not derivable from naturalism. If minds are the computed product of physics, they output whatever they output. There is no ideal form, perfection, or “truth” outside of what physics produces in any particular instance to compare what physics produces against. Whatever any individual computation of physics outputs with the label “rational” attached is the natural limit of what can be termed “rational”. There’s nothing the individual can compare it against; they are stuck with their own ruler and no means by which to check its length. What is considered “true” Read More ›
Research: How meditation (contemplation) calms the mind
Science is fallible and changes a lot, but it is a reliable guide to truth?
Squid and Octopus Coloration is Way More Complex Than We Said
Imagine that you saw a magnificent mansion and when you asked where it came from, you were shown a box of fantastic tools. Perhaps those fantastic tools were used to construct the mansion, but they don’t exactly answer your question. What about the construction materials, the workers, the design, and the construction process? Those unanswered questions are like the recent findings of how squids and octopuses control their image and color. Action potentials travel down the nerve to the synapse near the skin of the squid or octopus, the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is released and it sets off a sequence of events in special cells. Special proteins are phosphorylated, they congregate, the cell membrane folds in on itself, water is transported, the cell’s Read More ›
Imagine materialism rules
With no dictionary tricks, humans only 70% similar to chimps
Former professor of genetics at Clemson, Jeffrey Tomkins points out humans and chimps potentially have only 70% similarity. But this bold claim is at variance with the popularly reported similarity of 98%? How can this be? Recall the “dictionary trick” whereby Tom Wolfe’s famous novel The Right Stuff can be shown to be almost 100% identical to a dictionary merely by aligning the words in Wolfe’s novel against identical words in the dictionary. The illusion of similarity is brought about by a total disregard for sentence structure and context of the words within sentences, paragraphs, and chapters. When those considerations are taken into account, it becomes preposterous to assert The Right Stuff is almost 100% identical to a dictionary. But Read More ›