Atheism
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes interviews key atheists
Reason Ralliers: If you have to contrast yourself with Westboro Baptist Church in order to sound reasonable …
Reason Rally … not quite
From New Scientist, a “god” edition
Why do people think that they can “put down” Dawkins just by pointing out that he is ignorant and bigoted?
Edward Feser Contemplates the Reason Rally
Aristotilean/Thomist philosopher and sometimes ID Critic Edward Feser has recently penned a blog entry about the upcoming atheist “Reason Rally.”
Peer review and atheism: “These men and women have built their entire worldview on atheism,” says physicist Frank Tipler
Christopher Hitchens discovers the hitch in life after death – it’s Hitch-22
From The Best Schools: A Long Row of Days: Atheist Redemption in Russian playwright Chekhov
James Barham offers (March 12, 2012), “Another way of understanding Chekhov’s position is as the contrary of John Gray’s. That contemporary pessimist was observed here a while ago to be essentially saying to science and religion: “A plague on both your houses.” We may think of Chekhov as saying the exact opposite: We need both science and religion. Or, more exactly, we need the core of faith in the goodness of humanity that lies at the common root of both science and religion. Chekhov’s great subject is how we are to live our lives in the absence of all ideologies—how to get through the “long row of days” facing each of us. In this, he is the clear forerunner Read More ›
Why is the debate over design theory so often so poisonous and polarised, 2? (A: sadly, blood libel.)
Last time around, last May, the heart of the answer was: . . . if clever but willfully deceptive rhetors — Ms Forrest, B, with all due respect; sadly, this means you — can get away with strawmannising and dismissing design thinkers as “Creationists in cheap tuxedos,” where it has already been firmly fixed in the public mind by other clever rhetors — Mr Dawkins, CR, with all due respect; sadly, this means you — that Creationists are “ignorant, stupid, insane and/or wicked,” and that such are fighting “a war against science” and want to impose “a right-wing theocracy” (presumably complete with Inquisitions and burnings at the stake) then we can be distracted from the issues on the merits and Read More ›