Evolution
Can the fallout from mass extinctions enable prediction of patterns in evolution?
Claim: Modern crocodiles are evolving rapidly
Douglas Axe chapter excerpt: Can proteins evolve?
Another issue re the origin of plants between 3.4 and 2.9 billion years ago…
“Primordial hyper eye”? It sounds like science fiction. But it’s not. Read on.
Devolution: Earlier yeast splicosome was more complex
Michael Behe on extreme devolution: “Gnawing off a leg”
Book from Cambridge defends ID. So readers write to say…
At Evolution News: Nearly All of Evolution Is Best Explained by Engineering
How animals survive without sexual reproduction
At Quanta: Mathematical Analysis of Fruit Fly Wings Hints at Evolution’s Limits
Laszlo Bencze: Just another gratuitous use of the word “evolution” in the WSJ
Researchers: Cichlids are causing a rethink of the “fundamentals of evolution”
Another Truism Dies
A new paper can be found at Phys.Org undermining the idea that what drives evolution is the “decoupling” of DNA with phylogenic structures. This idea is implicit in the twin ideas of pseudogenes and gene duplication: both allow the DNA to become “uncoupled” from the structures they code for and so RM becomes permissible. Well, this paper shuts down this idea. Given the success of cichlids, understanding the evolution of these two jaws has become an important line of inquiry for biologists. “We’re trying to gain a better understanding of the origins and maintenance of biodiversity,” says Albertson. Researchers have long thought that the two sets of jaws are evolutionarily decoupled and can evolve independently of one another, pushing the Read More ›