Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Category

News

So now it’s the “creationists’” fault that Darwin’s followers can’t face facts?

In short, biologists must be wrong in thinking that there is no direction to evolution but admitting that is too controversial? So they have to keep it quiet by misrepresenting to the rest of us what “random evolution” means? Or if Kelly doesn't mean that, what DOES he mean? Read More ›

Retire this science idea, Edge: That there is a common toolkit of conserved genes

If indeed “Each lineage of ants contains about 4000 novel genes, but only 64 of these are conserved across all seven ant genomes sequenced so far,” why would anyone look to Darwin’s theory to explain anything about the history of ants? Read More ›

People’s Choice Awards: Our most read stories October 2013

Isn’t this the way it’s supposed to work, in their view?: They listen until they hear something that happens to trigger the “Shut UP!” gene that triggers the development of the “Shut UP!” neuron? Isn’t that the reason Evolution News & Views is holding a “Censor of the Year” contest? Read More ›

On consciousness, Tegmark gets one thing right, says Rob Sheldon

So what did Tegmark just say when he said “Consciousness is a state of matter”? He just said, “Consciousness is something people are consciously conscious of.” As Dufflepuds would say, “So true, so true, Boss.” But this is not what Penrose was saying about his microtubules. Read More ›