A key issue is that – by their own standards, however they came to set them – they cannot quite claim what they would like to.
” … because the only SM is not sufficient to explain our universe” (at mass 125 GeV).
“This may be the first time in history that a media headline about particle physics is incorrectly pessimistic … “
This is a leak. Announcement was supposed to be Friday.
RHIC’s physicists were seeking to duplicate the conditions that existed just an instant after the big bang that kicked off the universe’s expansion 13.7 billion years ago. (when gluons come unglued).
The bottom is temporarily motionless when falling off a tall building.
But if it turns out to be bad news, it is bad news in the real world. At least it is not frustrating, science-stopping nonsense about multiverses.
Or is it just a slow news day in June?
Multiverse, etc., proponents rattle on against philosophy – principally because philosophers can easily see through their pretenses by simple acts of logic.
“The scientists’ calculations showed that the quantum correlation between the bits can be so strong that they cannot be correlated with anything existing previously.”
Once again, Darwinism’s questionable relationship to thermodynamics is the issue.
” Social scientists would be better off doing what they do best: thinking deeply about what prompts human beings to behave the way they do.”
“He had heard these arguments before and wasn’t convinced by them. Pauli wanted to see calculated probabilities for large-scale evolution.”
“I think they were a little bit in a hurry to publish something that was astonishing, and at the end of the day it was a wrong measurement.”
“None of the hints announced so far from the Tevatron or LHC experiments, however, are strong enough to claim evidence for the Higgs boson.”