Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Pope on evolution?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

From Christine Rousselle here:

Wait, what? The Church published an encyclical 64 years ago saying exactly what Pope Francis said yesterday? You don’t say!

The media clearly adores Pope Francis, which I’m okay with. It’s nice to have positive media coverage of my faith. I’m not okay, however, with them twisting the pontiff’s words and claiming he’s “gone rogue” when he has done no such thing. Pope Francis has not changed any Catholic doctrine. Period.

The Pope cannot change any Catholic doctrine. He may clarify some. Not clear he did that here, but we will see.

In my own view, the only modern pope who actually understood the real issue (metaphysical naturalism) was Benedict XVI.

The problem with not clearly understanding that the Pontifical Academy would be happy to wish some version of metaphysical naturalism (naturalist atheism) on the Church in the guise of “science” is this: The battle must then be fought all over again later, under much more difficult conditions.

– O’Leary for News

See also: The Science Fictions series at your fingertips (human evolution)

The Science Fictions series at your fingertips (the human mind)

Comments
But the point is that they are random to us, although not to God. The Christian will believe they are guided, as he believes all things are, but that is an article of faith that isn't incorporated into a physical description of what happened that is relevant to mankind as a whole.Aleta
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
05:49 PM
5
05
49
PM
PDT
Aleta & RHampton7 Yes I think the Pope meant that, but it does conflict with Darwinism. If we mean "guided mutations" then there's no reason to call them "random". Of course, this is the very interventionist tinkering and magic wand-ing that we're supposed to reject also. If God is involved/guiding then ID is correct.Silver Asiatic
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
05:36 PM
5
05
36
PM
PDT
Aleta, you are correct.rhampton7
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
04:46 PM
4
04
46
PM
PDT
I think "“divinely guided random mutations” would be an apt description of the Pope's viewpoint, as it is orthodox Christian theology that everything that happens is divinely guided. What appears as chance from our human perspective is not chance to God. All that happens is God's will - no luck involved. That's my understanding of Christian theology.Aleta
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
03:19 PM
3
03
19
PM
PDT
Not every pope is a smart guy - we Catholics would honestly rather have a holy fool than a clever villain! The holy fool mainly causes trouble to US; the clever villain can harm people who would have a case against us in consequence. That said, Benedict was a good man AND a serious intellectual. He KNEW what the stakes are. SO many of the rest have been just trying to placate fusspots.News
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
03:04 PM
3
03
04
PM
PDT
Good commentary - thanks. Agreed on Benedict XVI - although even he sometimes made it sound like the Church had embraced Darwinism. It's all about the lingering phobia for Galileo's ghost (a bit of Halloween spookyness there for ya!) watching over every Church/science discussion. It's only been a few centuries - give it two or three more and a future pope will finally be able to say "what the Holy See really meant was that Darwinian theory is not compatible with Catholic doctrine". Until then, we have "God creating an evolvable human" and "divinely guided random mutations" -- and things like that.Silver Asiatic
October 29, 2014
October
10
Oct
29
29
2014
02:25 PM
2
02
25
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply