…two days ago I checked the website, and found that the paper was still there, with the only indication that it was retracted being a note (“RETRACTED ARTICLE”) on the BROWSER TAB of the paper, as well as on the downloadable pdf of the paper. I saw no indication on the paper’s site itself that it had been retracted, and it still appeared on the Springer Page…
I guess I can take some satisfaction that the paper has been “retracted”, but really, in what way has it been “retracted”? It’s still there, freely available on the paper’s website and even in the journal’s table of contents (where, I note, it is labeled as “retracted”. Jerry Coyne, “Springer “apparently” retracts a creationist paper, but it’s still on the website” at Why Evolution Is True
True. Jerry supplies screenshots. Here’s one showing that the paper was in fact retracted. See upper left:
If you download the paper, you will see RETRACTED shadow-printed diagonally on each page.
From Springer’s perspective, of course, their approach is best. Anyone can see what the paper says and that it was retracted. They are free to draw the conclusions they wish.
Making the paper disappear, to please people like Jerry, would be far less transparent.
Hmmm. To please Jerry, maybe the author will have to disappear too. 😉
Follow UD News at Twitter!
See also: Update: Springer defends publication of creationist paper to Jerry Coyne He got a reply within 24 hours, one which he considers “lame and evasive.”
Update 2: Springer Has Forwarded Jerry Coyne’s Concern Re Creationist Paper