Theistic evolutionist: Can we absolutely prove that the fruit fly with ant decals on its wings could not happen by chance?
Huxley on Evolutionary Ethics
The following quote is taken from Thomas Henry Huxley’s essay, Evolution and Ethics (The Romanes Lecture, 1893): The propounders of what are called the “ethics of evolution,” when the ‘evolution of ethics’ would usually better express the object of their speculations, adduce a number of more or less interesting facts and more or less sound arguments in favour of the origin of the moral sentiments, in the same way as other natural phenomena, by a process of evolution. I have little doubt, for my own part, that they are on the right track; but as the immoral sentiments have no less been evolved, there is, so far, as much natural sanction for the [80] one as the other. The thief Read More ›
New theory of consciousness: Humans, worms, and the Internet are all conscious
Is the particle zoo just a hopeful fantasy?
Galaxies under construction …
Who’s the next Carl Sagan?
The US. Darwin in the schools lobby is serious about climate change activism
Professor Larry Moran supports the use of ID-compatible science textbooks in Texas classrooms
Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. Professor Larry Moran has written an astonishing post over on his Sandwalk blog, in which he rejects a proposal by David Evans, Executive Director of the National Science Teachers Association, that Texas students be taught “evolution by natural selection as a major unifying concept in science,” and suggests that they simply be taught “evolution” instead, adding in a comment that “there’s no reason to eliminate the possibility of directed evolution” – a term which is broad enough to include both “theologically-directed evolution” (as one commenter calls it) and “the Flying Spaghetti Monster.” Readers may be wondering what accounts for Professor Moran’s surprising latitude of opinion. It turns out that he’s a big fan of Read More ›
Were fast-evolving stretches of DNA crucial to human evolution?
Archaeopteryx, Icon of devolution not evolution
HT: David Coppedge In all the debates about the status of Archaeopteryx between reptiles and birds, no one till now expected this wild idea: it lost its ability to fly. Michael Habib (Univ. of Southern California) raised eyebrows in Los Angeles last week when he told a packed house at the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology meeting that he believes Archaeopteryx was secondarily flightless. Nature News reported, The idea that it was instead evolving to lose its flight and becoming flightless again, or ‘secondarily flightless’, occurred to Habib while he was calculating limb ratios and degrees of feather symmetry in Archaeopteryx, and comparing the values to those of living birds, to better understand its flying ability. In doing so, he found Read More ›