Skip to content
Sunday, April 02, 2023

Uncommon Descent

Serving The Intelligent Design Community

  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Resources
    • Frequently raised but weak arguments against Intelligent Design
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Archive of Posts by Michael Behe
    • Darwinian Debating Devices
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • 1/137

Tag: 1/137

Fine tuning Intelligent Design

Why must fine-tuning be classed as a problem, not just a fact?

A good deal of effort goes into explaining away the fine-tuning of our universe and our Earth for life. But note the intellectually disastrous theses that are casually accepted as alternatives. What if we just accepted it? The way we accept the significance of 1/137.

Posted on June 3, 2019June 3, 2019 Author News Comments(23)
Cosmology Intelligent Design Mathematics

New Scientist on the glitch at the edge of the universe

The constant 1/137 may be variable after all. This immutable number determines how stars burn, how chemistry happens and even whether atoms exist at all. Physicist Richard Feynman, who knew a thing or two about it, called it “one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no Read More…

Posted on October 4, 2018October 4, 2018 Author News Comments(2)

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Donate

Help us to continue generating quality content and reliable website service.

Recent Comments

  • Querius Bornagain77 @62, Thank you for not bothering linking to Nick Lane's paper on ATP, even for comedy relief. In his... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @58 We do not experience sense impressions for what they really are – namely electrical crackles, right? So, we do... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist @Ori Let’s take a concrete example: my certain knowledge that I exist. A concrete example? As in one of many?... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @81 ‘Darwinists’ don’t ‘deny’ teleological purpose because of their philosophical tendencies; they just think there is sufficient evidence to show... – L&FP, 69: A way to understand...
  • Querius While Chuckdarwin continues to avoid denouncing the ugly racism implicit in Darwinism, let me instead comment on Critical Rationalist's response... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • jerry We lack other universes to which we can compare our’s to. Right? Another stupid comment! Shows a complete lack of... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist Why answer the people denying the fine tuning? We lack other universes to which we can compare our's to. Right?... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • Alan Fox As BA77 didn't link to Nick Lane's paper on a pre-biotic origin for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), here it is. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001437 – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • chuckdarwin Querius I read it the first time (there's a dog-eared copy on my shelf along with the Origins) as a... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist CR, we both know that measurable, functionally specific, complex organisation and associated information is 200 years beyond Paley’s valid but... – L&FP, 69: A way to understand...
  • Querius Upright BiPed@58, What you are doing is denying the validity of design inference based on your personal ideology, and you... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @159 :)You can’t even define “mistake” in your Darwinian worldview. I do not have a "Darwinian worldview", whatever that's supposed... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Sandy I won’t make that mistake again. :)You can't even define "mistake" in your Darwinian worldview. – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Querius Chuckdarwin @55, Why would I resort to a chatbot when I have some of the world’s most renowned ID and... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @151 In response to my point (see 142) about the pragmatics and semantics of the words "certainty" and "knowledge", we... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • chuckdarwin Querius/44 Why would I resort to a chatbot when I have some of the world's most renowned ID and Bible... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • bornagain77 Of note: Origin of Life: Controversial Chemist Shakes up Scientific Community | Problems with Primordial Soup - March 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZugOrSD7YL4... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • Origenes // Correction #156 // – If you managed that, how could you infallibly interpret that infallible source? How do I... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • jerry including yours Be specific and they can be discussed. I was specifically referring to the fine tuning which is so... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • Origenes CR @140, 149 has some questions for me: – How could you infallibly identify a supposed infallible source, out of... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Alan Fox One of the emergent properties of RNA is that individual bases will pair bond (always Guanine with Cytosine, Adenine with... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
Copyright © 2023 Uncommon Descent. All rights reserved.
Theme: Newspaper Plus by ThemeCentury. Powered by WordPress.