william lane craig
Evangelical scientists getting it wrong…
Scripture scholar John Oswalt weighs in critically on William Lane Craig’s Historical Adam
William Lane Craig vs. Lewis Wolpert: Is God a delusion?
Sean McDowell interviews William Lane Craig: Is Adam historical?
William Lane Craig and atheist actor Scott Clifton on the Kalam Cosmological Constant
William Lane Craig and Alvin Planting rank in Top Ten of world philosophers
William Lane Craig vs. Daniel Came on Does God Exist
Fine-tuning of the universe while you watch
God and mathematics – Why does mathematics work?
What happened before the Big Bang is not really a science question
Why won’t Richard Dawkins debate William Lane Craig?
Penrose and Craig explain the universe for us at Unbelievable
Naturalism and ethics: an inevitable contradiction?
Ken Francis, author, with Theodore Dalrymple, of The Terror of Existence: From Ecclesiastes to Theatre of the Absurd, writes to tell us of an effort to account for objective moral laws and duties form the perspective of pure naturalist atheism. He thinks it doesn’t work but you, the reader, shall judge: From Reasonable Faith: And the atheist answer to all these moral dilemmas (Slavery, Child Abuse, Genocide, Molestation, Murder, Rape, etc.) is, “Well, it’s all relative!” Dr. William Lane Craig and Ravi Zacharias tells atheist Dr. Bernard Leikind that if his morality rests upon relativism he cannot in principle label literally anything as absolutely wrong, be it slavery, child abuse, or child molestation, torture, genocide, racism, murder, etc., This clip Read More ›
Michael Ruse update: “Morality is just an aid to survival and reproduction…
. . . And any deeper meaning is illusory.” Reader Ken Francis, author with Theodore Dalrymple of The Terror of Existence: From Ecclesiastes to Theatre of the Absurd, read our piece on Darwinian philosopher Michael Ruse explaining why he is not a new atheist. He thought other readers might be interested to know of something Dr. Ruse has said in the past: Morality is a biological adaptation no less than are hands and feet and teeth. Considered as a rationally justifiable set of claims about an objective something, ethics is illusory. I appreciate that when somebody says ‘love thy neighbor as thyself,’ they think they are referring above and beyond themselves. Nevertheless, such reference is truly without foundation. Morality is Read More ›