The Manhattan Contrarian on David Gelernter abandoning Darwinism
Does survival of the fittest not apply to frogs?
What difference does Neanderthal ancestry make?
Paper: Sperm cells take up genetic material from outside themselves
Is Nature needlessly annoying Dan Graur, the champion of junk DNA?
Rational Religion’s conversations with Darwin skeptic David Berlinski
Intelligent design? Ray Kurzweil’s AI-driven Singularity would make the whole universe intelligent
Rob Sheldon on why statisticians are in a panic
One of the biggest problems with Darwin’s theory may now be his supporters
Late stage materialism?: Panpsychism (your coffee mug is conscious) sounds crazy but…
Computers’ stupidity makes them dangerous
Once More from the Top on “Mechanism”
We often get some variation of “Until ID proposes a ‘mechanism’ for how the design is accomplished, it cannot be taken seriously as an explanation for origins.” Here is an example from frequent commenter Bob O’H (who, after years of participation on this site should know better): If ID is correct, then the design has to have happened somehow, so a “how” theory has to exist. OK, Bob, once more from the top: Suppose someone printed your post on a piece of paper and handed it to an investigator. We’ll call him Johnny. The object of the investigation is to determine whether the text on the paper was produced by an intelligent agent or a random letter generator. Johnny, using Read More ›