Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Quote of the Day

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The quote of the day comes from commenter AaronS1978. In a comment to my last post, Aaron brings to our attention MMA fighter Fallon Fox, a man posing as a woman and fighting in the woman’s division. He has smashed the faces of multiple woman. Aaron writes that in our brave new world:

beating the crap out of a woman is OK as long as you think you’re a woman

Where are the feminists?

Comments
JVL, this is what the crumbling of the BATNA of lawfulness looks like, leading to a slide into lawless ideological oligarchy. And it is not merely anecdotal, when a pattern is widespread, it is not hard to encounter it. Think about naked online censorship and labels attached to those the technoplutocrats and bureaurats -- deliberate -- don't like. Don;t forget, we already saw red guard mobs in the street, with obvious backing and we have seen a reichstag fire agitprop and lawfare incident (with the latest being a man hounded into suicide, the gestapo and kangaroo courts don't have to come to your door at 4 am to be effective). KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
11:29 PM
11
11
29
PM
PDT
Vivid, so we see the intimidation factor, policing power is being warped as part of injustice built on power backed untruth. Of course, enablers, conveniently, are in denial of unwelcome realities as degree of threat for standing up for truth mounts. So much for rights if exercising freedom of conscience, association and expression gets you on terrorism watch lists, a target for federal scrutiny [notice recent reported cases of speaking out at School Board meetings . . . chilling effect], exposed to job loss and likely mounting legal expenses with serious doubts you will get genuine justice in court. Why are your relatives not up in arms, along with their whole communities, about loss of basic rights? De Nile is a river in Egypt. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
11:16 PM
11
11
16
PM
PDT
JVL, degree of threat is directly related to context, and general removal of the ladies room as a safe space by allowing men to effectively access at will under colours of a patently false to fact identity is -- as you must know -- an invitation to trouble. The activists and their backers also know this, so we must reckon it a part of power backed untruth intended to impose injustice. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
11:11 PM
11
11
11
PM
PDT
JVL “While I would probably disagree that shared bathrooms (common in English reception classes) and mask wearing are abusive I would say that those parents should do what they can to influence and affect their school board.” They are afraid they will lose their jobs and be put on a terrorist watch list, this is Portland we are talking about. “ And, in the worst case, move their children to someplace else IF that is a possibility. Sometimes that is not a possibility. I realise how hard it is to home school” Your right home schooling and moving is not possible. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
11:07 PM
11
11
07
PM
PDT
Vivid and JVL, the two lists obviously come from the same root source, as I showed at 191. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
11:06 PM
11
11
06
PM
PDT
JVL “What I meant was: if you want to call yourself that, be my guest” Fair enough however that means you have not yet answered my question which you said you would do “what is a woman”? “Just because your own values are becoming more marginal doesn’t mean the whole show is collapsing.” It’s not about values it’s about embracing non reality. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
10:57 PM
10
10
57
PM
PDT
Vividbleau: But what really shocked me was how angry they were over what their children have suffered with the masks and they are absolutely livid regarding shared bathrooms. JVL I don’t think you appreciate how angry moms are regarding this abusive behavior targeting their children. My advice to them was this. As hard as it is for them with their jobs and raising children they must become activists, they should focus on one thing and one thing only, the school board. They must vote out the current school board members who are abusing their children. While I would probably disagree that shared bathrooms (common in English reception classes) and mask wearing are abusive I would say that those parents should do what they can to influence and affect their school board. And, in the worst case, move their children to someplace else IF that is a possibility. Sometimes that is not a possibility. I realise how hard it is to home school but, in my experience, in the Pacific Northwest there are many resources and shared personnel for those wishing to home school. Back in the 90s I attended a graduation ceremony for home schooled high schoolers that was attended by 100s of kids and their parents. LOL. Change your mind? By your own words the only evidence required is that one person lays title to one of the 72. They are no more absurd than your position that a woman is anyone who “claims title” What I meant was: if you want to call yourself that, be my guest. It doesn't imply that I have to take you seriously in my own mind. I will try and be respectful and courteous as always. I believe that the psychological case has been made for some gender dysphoria but some of those on that list . . . call me skeptical. I’m not afraid at all. Western Civilization is beyond decadent, it’s crumbling, the center is not holding. A society cannot adopt non reality as reality and escape it’s consequences. You seem to think it can, good luck with that. I'm seeing it flourish and be strong in Europe! After millennia of killing each other, most recently in living memory, much of Europe is now peaceful and cooperative. Many countries have universal, state-level health care, good schools, good social programmes, fair and honest elections, good standards of living. Where is this crumbling happening? Just because your own values are becoming more marginal doesn't mean the whole show is collapsing.JVL
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
10:48 PM
10
10
48
PM
PDT
Ram “Again, no penises in non-penis spaces. It really is that simple.” Yes it is. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
10:28 PM
10
10
28
PM
PDT
JVL “Political, policy making, you must vote! If you are concerned then make sure your views are heard. “ Ohh I’m voting no doubt about that. Over the weekend I had some liberal family members in town that live in Portland. I asked how bad things were there and they said “ worse than can be imagined” that it will take years if ever for Portland to come back. But what really shocked me was how angry they were over what their children have suffered with the masks and they are absolutely livid regarding shared bathrooms. JVL I don’t think you appreciate how angry moms are regarding this abusive behavior targeting their children. My advice to them was this. As hard as it is for them with their jobs and raising children they must become activists, they should focus on one thing and one thing only, the school board. They must vote out the current school board members who are abusing their children. “ Your link is much more serious than the one Kairosfocus provided . . . honestly I still can’t take some of those ‘genders’ seriously. BUT I’m willing to change my mind if the science and psychology back up the cases.” LOL. Change your mind? By your own words the only evidence required is that one person lays title to one of the 72. They are no more absurd than your position that a woman is anyone who “claims title” “You seem to be very afraid but I’m not.” I’m not afraid at all but I am very sad to watch Western Civilization commit suicide. It is beyond decadent, it’s crumbling, the center is not holding. A society cannot adopt non reality as reality and escape it’s consequences. You seem to think it can, good luck with that. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
10:25 PM
10
10
25
PM
PDT
Again, no penises in non-penis spaces. It really is that simple. --Ramram
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
06:57 PM
6
06
57
PM
PDT
SA, it is the authorities who acted. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
09:12 AM
9
09
12
AM
PDT
KF
Sc, you are being abusive and over the line with snide and utterly unnecessary, uncivil commentary. This is your single warning.
Thank you for your attention to this and for moderating him quickly. I wanted to flag his post somehow - the product of a perverted mind (which is not surprising) but I'm glad you saw it anyway and took decisive actions.Silver Asiatic
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
07:38 AM
7
07
38
AM
PDT
Sandy: We know that JVL thinks that the vaccines are good and the Russians are bad and everything legacy media tell him to be true I do think vaccines are good because of the science not the media although some outlets do do a good job discussing the science. The Russian people are much like anyone else, their current leader and his acolytes are pretty horrible. After all JVL needs mental stability have to believe whatever goverment [sic]/ science tell him because in his mind goverment [sic]/ science has replaced God ? and you can’t afford to believe that God’s surrogate lied to you because that would mean to be anxious and if you are anxious long enough you became sick . Clearly you don't live in the UK and hear the ways the news agencies scrutinise and tear-apart the politicians and, sometimes, even the scientists. It's not your fault you don't live somewhere which has decent, factual media outlets but knee-jerk believing they are bad sounds a lot like what you are accusing me of, i.e. not thinking or looking at things critically. You don't really know me and I doubt you'll believe anything I tell you because you've closed your mind to things you think are corrupt or wrong but I never, ever take a single report or research paper or opinion as gospel truth. Too often I have seen a politician or a philosopher or a scientist gets something wrong; sometimes 'honestly', frequently because of being narrow minded. Like I said, no doubt you will continue to write me off as a deluded, lying, idiot because I disagree with you on some ideas you consider core indicators. I could do the same with you but I shall do my best to consider what you have to say objectively. I'd like to hope you would reciprocate but far be it for me to tell you what to do. You're an adult so you can make up your own mind.JVL
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
06:39 AM
6
06
39
AM
PDT
JVL Your link is much more serious than the one Kairosfocus provided . . . honestly I still can’t take some of those ‘genders’ seriously. BUT I’m willing to change my mind if the science and psychology back up the cases.
:) NPC. Pre-programmed robots that inform you about what tv told them to be true. If you want to know what NPC thinks just browse BBC,CNN,...We know that JVL thinks that the vaccines are good and the Russians are bad and everything legacy media tell him to be true . After all JVL needs mental stability have to believe whatever goverment/ science tell him because in his mind goverment/ science has replaced God :) and you can't afford to believe that God's surrogate lied to you because that would mean to be anxious and if you are anxious long enough you became sick .Sandy
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
04:47 AM
4
04
47
AM
PDT
H'mm:
trans-people[--> cultural marxist agendas] have a lot of support all over the planet
So, where are we being herded, why? 1984? See https://uncommondescent.com/media/to-get-change-create-or-exploit-a-crisis/ KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
04:33 AM
4
04
33
AM
PDT
Vivid, I see your list B, let's sample:
Agender: A person who does not identify themselves with or experience any gender. Agender people are also called null-gender, genderless, gendervoid, or neutral gender. Abimegender: Associated with being profound, deep, and infinite. The term abimegender may be used alone or in combination with other genders. Adamas gender: A gender that is indefinable or indomitable. People identifying with this gender refuse to be categorized in any particular gender identity. Aerogender: Also called evaisgender, this gender identity changes according to one’s surroundings. Aesthetigender: Also called aesthetgender, it is a type of gender identity derived from aesthetics. Affectugender: This is based on the person’s mood swings or fluctuations. Agenderflux: A person with this gender identity is mostly agender with brief shifts of belonging to other gender types. Alexigender: The person has a fluid gender identity between more than one type of gender although they cannot name the genders they feel fluid in. Aliusgender: This gender identity stands apart from existing social gender constructs. It means having a strong specific gender identity that is neither male nor female. Amaregender: Having a gender identity that changes depending on the person one is emotionally attached to. Ambigender: Having two specific gender identities simultaneously without any fluidity or fluctuations.
Now, let's compare the List A, first eleven:
Abimegender: a gender that is profound, deep, and infinite; meant to resemble when one mirror is reflecting into another mirror creating an infinite paradox Adamasgender: a gender which refuses to be categorized Aerogender: a gender that is influenced by your surroundings Aesthetigender: a gender that is derived from an aesthetic; also known as videgender Affectugender: a gender that is affected by mood swings Agender: the feeling of no gender/absence of gender or neutral gender Agenderflux: being mostly agender except having small shifts towards other genders making them demigenders (because of the constancy of being agender) Alexigender: a gender that is fluid between more than one gender but the individual cannot tell what those genders are Aliusgender: a gender which is removed from common gender descriptors and guidelines Amaregender: a gender that changes depending on who you’re in love with Ambigender: defined as having the feeling of two genders simultaneously without fluctuation; meant to reflect the concept of being ambidextrous, only with gender
They obviously come from the same root source. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
04:01 AM
4
04
01
AM
PDT
JVL, the cultural marxist stampede is already happening right now. And, unfortunately if anarchy is let loose triggering a reaction that opens the door, or we directly slide into lawless oligarchy, freedom will be lost. It will only be bought again at a much higher price in blood as states are inherently so much more powerful today. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
03:56 AM
3
03
56
AM
PDT
Scamp, having insisted on trollish conduct, is no longer with us.kairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
03:49 AM
3
03
49
AM
PDT
Vividbleau: Honestly I don’t know what you mean. What conversation should I be participating in? Political, policy making, you must vote! If you are concerned then make sure your views are heard. And, I'd advise you do so NOT anonymously but that's up to you. Your link is much more serious than the one Kairosfocus provided . . . honestly I still can't take some of those 'genders' seriously. BUT I'm willing to change my mind if the science and psychology back up the cases. Because if you don’t close that barn door and find who opened the door were all going to get trampled in the stampede. I don't think that is happening or is going to happen. You seem to be very afraid but I'm not. I've got nothing else to say really. I shall attempt to reply to any serious and respectful questions if you choose to pose any. Thanks for your time.JVL
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
02:47 AM
2
02
47
AM
PDT
KF “Your problem, obviously, is that things on your preferred policy agenda are so open to subjectivity and relativism that satire and reality look about the same. Exactly. We are living in a world where non reality has replaced reality thus we see outrageous headlines that we know can’t be true but we find out they are. We tell ourselves this is a joke right.? But we find out it’s not a joke. Welcome to the end of western civilization. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
01:55 AM
1
01
55
AM
PDT
JVL “But, I’m telling you, trans-people have a lot of support all over the planet” Tell me something I don’t already know. “You’re not getting the horse back in the barn.” Yes the horse has bolted but who opened the door and how many horses are still in the barn? You all mock KF but he is spot on. While others focus on the horse KF focuses on who opened the door? Because if you don’t close that barn door and find who opened the door were all going to get trampled in the stampede. Vividvividbleau
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
01:46 AM
1
01
46
AM
PDT
JVL, First, as I already highlighted, I FIRST MET THIS LIST OFFLINE IN A SERIOUS POLICY CONTEXT. Your problem, obviously, is that things on your preferred policy agenda are so open to subjectivity and relativism that satire and reality look about the same. The reason why, is that both are absurd. The underlying point, being, that once the invented notion, "gender" was snatched from Grammar and used to replace objective, XY chromosome determined sex, then we reduced matters to psycho social relativism and/or subjectivism. This then falls into, lo and behold, the absurdities of these approaches to thought, knowledge, ethics, policy. 1984 world, here we come. Let's pause to look at:
Transgender: any gender identity that transcends or does not align with your assigned gender or society’s idea of gender; the feeling of being any gender that does not match your assigned gender
This draws out the problem once we see that "assigned gender" is code for, one shows primary and secondary male or female characteristics and faces society's reasonable response that men are of the male sex and women are of the female sex, these being the complementary partners in reproduction. Where also, requisites of child nurture require stable heterosexual bonding and commitment at the core of family. So, we find frameworks that support this, in civilisations. But now, inject the jacobin radicalism, with intent to suspect, discredit, destroy and replace inconvenient traditions. We thus come to the switcheroo, sex is between your legs, gender is in your head (presumably, genetically coded in some subtle way like we saw with the futile search for so called gay genes). Of course, the incoherence that the manifestly genetically coded determination of sex is to be suppressed is glided over silently. Appeal is made to feelings, to identity. That is to subjectivity and to ideologised reframing with the implied narrative that traditional society is suspect and oppressive. Ask fish what they feel like about being freed from that oppressive context, water. We see clues as to underlying cultural marxism, i.e. the most widely found form of jacobinism. Since 1789, such ideologies routinely, predictably fail, becoming reigns of terror under lawless ideological oligarchy. And of course, you recognise absurdity. Nearly all of them are, INCLUDING the one now being pushed by power: transgender. Now too, JVL, guess why the sports exception? Because, well, as part of the general male body form, you tend to get higher athletic performance in many sports, and in the case of contact sports, the more delicate female skeletal structure causes obvious dangers. The result is unfair and sometimes dangerous contests. This is precisely why there was a categorisation of classes by age, sex and the like to begin with. In short, subjectivism and relativism are coming up short in the face of objective reality. In addition, body privacy is a key to widespread social participation of women. Hence, sexed bathrooms, a social innovation that reflects several objective realities. The original, justified, safe space. Where, women know that they are a natural prey for the most dangerous predator ever to walk this planet, the human male. Which is also part of why family structures are designed to protect women and girls, in key part. It is why there are social codes for gentlemanly and ladylike conduct, complete with rituals of reminder. Where too, sports are precisely a key context for training in fair play. So, naturally, misanthropic, anti civilisational, often poorly adjusted radicals target sports. The sports fiascos are warning signs of much wider, deeper problems. KFkairosfocus
April 1, 2022
April
04
Apr
1
01
2022
01:20 AM
1
01
20
AM
PDT
JVL “Best start participating in the conversations instead of just trying to shut it all down.” Honestly I don’t know what you mean. What conversation should I be participating in? Shut what down? “Did anyone provide medical or research support for the list? It’s pretty clearly a joke.” https://www.medicinenet.com/what_are_the_72_other_genders/article.htm Vividvividbleau
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
11:52 PM
11
11
52
PM
PDT
Clip: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9967/
Chromosomal Sex Determination in Mammals Primary and secondary sex determination Primary sex determination is the determination of the gonads. In mammals, primary sex determination is strictly chromosomal and is not usually influenced by the environment. In most cases, the female is XX and the male is XY. Every individual must have at least one X chromosome. Since the female is XX, each of her eggs has a single X chromosome. The male, being XY, can generate two types of sperm: half bear the X chromosome, half the Y. If the egg receives another X chromosome from the sperm, the resulting individual is XX, forms ovaries, and is female; if the egg receives a Y chromosome from the sperm, the individual is XY, forms testes, and is male. The Y chromosome carries a gene that encodes a testis-determining factor. This factor organizes the gonad into a testis rather than an ovary. Unlike the situation in Drosophila (discussed below), the mammalian Y chromosome is a crucial factor for determining sex in mammals. A person with five X chromosomes and one Y chromosome (XXXXXY) would be male. Furthermore, an individual with only a single X chromosome and no second X or Y (i.e., XO) develops as a female and begins making ovaries, although the ovarian follicles cannot be maintained. For a complete ovary, a second X chromosome is needed. In mammalian primary sex determination, there is no “default state.” The formation of ovaries and testes are both active, gene-directed processes. Moreover, as we shall see, both diverge from a common precursor, the bipotential gonad. Secondary sex determination affects the bodily phenotype outside the gonads. A male mammal has a penis, seminal vesicles, and prostate gland. A female mammal has a vagina, cervix, uterus, oviducts, and mammary glands. In many species, each sex has a sex-specific size, vocal cartilage, and musculature. These secondary sex characteristics are usually determined by hormones secreted from the gonads. However, in the absence of gonads, the female phenotype is generated. When Jost (1953) removed fetal rabbit gonads before they had differentiated, the resulting rabbits had a female phenotype, regardless of whether they were XX or XY. They each had oviducts, a uterus, and a vagina, and each lacked a penis and male accessory structures. The general scheme of mammalian sex determination is shown in Figure 17.2. If the Y chromosome is absent, the gonadal primordia develop into ovaries. The ovaries produce estrogen, a hormone that enables the development of the Müllerian duct into the uterus, oviducts, and upper end of the vagina. If the Y chromosome is present, testes form and secrete two major hormones. The first hormone—anti-Müllerian duct hormone (AMH; also referred to as Müllerian-inhibiting substance, MIS)—destroys the Müllerian duct. The second hormone—testosterone—masculinizes the fetus, stimulating the formation of the penis, scrotum, and other portions of the male anatomy, as well as inhibiting the development of the breast primordia. Thus, the body has the female phenotype unless it is changed by the two hormones secreted by the fetal testes.
Chromosomes and consequences . . .kairosfocus
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
11:37 PM
11
11
37
PM
PDT
Video summary on sex determination systems https://youtu.be/kMWxuF9YW38kairosfocus
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
11:31 PM
11
11
31
PM
PDT
Vividbleau: Given your position that one’s gender is that which one chooses it to be I have no idea why you think it’s absurd? It’s no more absurd than Did you read the entries on the list? Some are clearly farcical. Did you follow the link given by Kairosfocus? Did anyone provide medical or research support for the list? It's pretty clearly a joke. Of course not you are I believe you are a man but it effects women and it effects me because it effects my family.For all the talk about not wanting men who think they are women to participate in sports that would be in direct opposition to title IX and against the law. I know a lot of women in Europe (where the law you refer to does not exist) who are completely in favour of trans-individuals. Except, as I mentioned, regarding sports and prisons where, as I admitted, a lot of work needs to be done. In fact, most people I know who are pro-trans rights agree that trans-women should NOT be allowed to participate in the womens' events. o now not only are women’s privacy rights violated but title IX which women fought so hard over are being gutted. But it doesn’t affect you so all is right in the world. America, like the rest of the world, has to discuss and debate such issues and come up with a solution so that no one gets hurt or has their privacy violated. But, I'm telling you, trans-people have a lot of support all over the planet. You're not getting the horse back in the barn. Best start participating in the conversations instead of just trying to shut it all down.JVL
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
11:11 PM
11
11
11
PM
PDT
Vivid, thanks. The troll knows he has crossed the line but now wants to play the you can't take a mere joke card. So, what part of microagrressions etc suddenly vanishes, here? If they were not self servingly inconsistent, they would have no standards. KFkairosfocus
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
10:39 PM
10
10
39
PM
PDT
PPS, the abusive reaction implies that the list of genders is striking home, flak implies over target. More,
Paragender: the feeling very near one gender and partially something else which keeps you from feeling fully that gender Perigender: identifying with a gender but not as a gender Polygender: the feeling of having more than one simultaneous or fluctuating gender; simultaneous with multigenderand omnigender Proxvir: a masculine gender similar to boy, but on a separate plane and off to itself Quoigender: feeling as if the concept of gender is inapplicable or nonsensical to one’s self Subgender: mostly agender with a bit of another gender Surgender: having a gender that is 100% one gender but with more of another gender added on top of that Systemgender: a gender that is the sum of all the genders within a multiple or median system Tragender: a gender that stretches over the whole spectrum of genders Transgender: any gender identity that transcends or does not align with your assigned gender or society’s idea of gender; the feeling of being any gender that does not match your assigned gender
The point is, the concept of gender as opposed to sex based on biology, opened the door to radical relativism and subjectivism, which are inherently self refuting and anti civilisational. It is time to look at that issue again, from Lewis Vaughn's reflections on ethical import:
Excerpted chapter summary, on Subjectivism, Relativism, and Emotivism, in Doing Ethics 3rd Edn, by Lewis Vaughn, W W Norton, 2012. [Also see here and here.] Clipping: . . . Subjective relativism is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it. A person’s approval makes the action right. This doctrine (as well as cultural relativism) is in stark contrast to moral objectivism, the view that some moral principles are valid for everyone.. Subjective relativism, though, has some troubling implications. It implies that each person is morally infallible and that individuals can never have a genuine moral disagreement Cultural relativism is the view that an action is morally right if one’s culture approves of it. The argument for this doctrine is based on the diversity of moral judgments among cultures: because people’s judgments about right and wrong differ from culture to culture, right and wrong must be relative to culture, and there are no objective moral principles. This argument is defective, however, because the diversity of moral views does not imply that morality is relative to cultures. In addition, the alleged diversity of basic moral standards among cultures may be only apparent, not real. Societies whose moral judgments conflict may be differing not over moral principles but over nonmoral facts. Some think that tolerance is entailed by cultural relativism. But there is no necessary connection between tolerance and the doctrine. Indeed, the cultural relativist cannot consistently advocate tolerance while maintaining his relativist standpoint. To advocate tolerance is to advocate an objective moral value. But if tolerance is an objective moral value, then cultural relativism must be false, because it says that there are no objective moral values. Like subjective relativism, cultural relativism has some disturbing consequences. It implies that cultures are morally infallible, that social reformers can never be morally right, that moral disagreements between individuals in the same culture amount to arguments over whether they disagree with their culture, that other cultures cannot be legitimately criticized, and that moral progress is impossible. Emotivism is the view that moral utterances are neither true nor false but are expressions of emotions or attitudes. It leads to the conclusion that people can disagree only in attitude, not in beliefs. People cannot disagree over the moral facts, because there are no moral facts. Emotivism also implies that presenting reasons in support of a moral utterance is a matter of offering nonmoral facts that can influence someone’s attitude. It seems that any nonmoral facts will do, as long as they affect attitudes. Perhaps the most far-reaching implication of emotivism is that nothing is actually good or bad. There simply are no properties of goodness and badness. There is only the expression of favorable or unfavorable emotions or attitudes toward something.
We may add, when something can be anything at whim, it has become meaningless, something the principle of distinct identity protects us from. That is, a root of this is refusal to acknowledge that our two sexes hold their distinct identity i/l/o core characteristics and have objective reference. Which, too, is why we can identify rare medical conditions as based on problems with the system. Notice here, as a sign of what is really up, definition of transgender, sitting in midst of a list. Suddenly, we see it is defiance of the objectivity of sex determination on the XY system. Obviously, they would have preferred that we be like grouper fish, which DO change sex, but notice, male --> female, i.e. within the wider context of complementary sexes in reproduction.kairosfocus
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
10:36 PM
10
10
36
PM
PDT
PS, there can be no body of brain scans regarding 112 or at least, dozens of allegedly standardised genders. Likely, you mean, comparing brain scans of the two sexes. Which simply carries us back to the objectivity of sex determination based on the XY system. Where, brain scans, waves etc are of course not a definition of thought, they just mark zones of activity. That is, you are creeping over into [genetically determined . . .? spot the irony or outright incoherence?] computationalism which directly undermines the rationality and freedom you need to have credible argument, warrant and knowledge, your argument is self-defeating. Computers, inherently, are non rational.kairosfocus
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
10:26 PM
10
10
26
PM
PDT
“seriously, you have to grow a sense of humour.” It wasn’t funny. Vividvividbleau
March 31, 2022
March
03
Mar
31
31
2022
10:24 PM
10
10
24
PM
PDT
1 2 3 4 5 9

Leave a Reply