Eric Holloway
Eric Holloway: How Dembski’s explanatory filter can help quash conspiracy theories
Eric Holloway asks, What is the essential feature of creative intelligence?
Eric Holloway: Is AI the next stage of evolution?
Can a big enough computer come up with a Theory of Everything? Eric Holloway says yer dreamin’…
Eric Holloway: To what extent does life simply invent itself as it goes along?
Putting Richard Dawkins’s evolution claims to a computer science test
Eric Holloway: An experiment can test the idea that there is an infinite number of universes
Eric Holloway: Why engineering can’t be reduced to the laws of physics
Eric Holloway: Why Bell’s theorem matters
Especially to conservation of information theory: This brings us to a more general result known as the conservation of information. Design theorists William Dembski and Robert J. Marks defined the law of conservation of information in their 2009 paper “Conservation of Information in Search” and then proved the result in their follow-on 2010 paper “The Search for a Search”. The conservation of information (COI) says the expected active information produced by any combination of random and deterministic processes is guaranteed to be zero or less. Active information is itself the difference between two different probability distributions. We can see the conservation of information is a generalization of Bell’s no-go theorem in quantum mechanics. It contrasts the difference between two probability Read More ›
Eric Holloway: Why your computer will never talk to you
Eric Holloway: A scientific test for true intelligence
A scientific test should identify precisely what humans can do that computers cannot, avoiding subjective opinion: The “broken checkerboard” is not the ultimate scientific test for intelligence that we need. But it is a truly scientific test in the sense that it is capable of falsifying the theory that the mind is reducible to computation. Eric Holloway, “A scientific test for true intelligence” at Mind Matters News See also: Current artificial intelligence research is unscientific. The assumption that the human mind can be reduced to a computer program has never really been tested. Because AI research is based on a fundamental assumption that has not been scientifically tested—that the human mind can be reduced to a computer—then the research itself cannot be Read More ›