He does not really address the fact that most naturalists don’t actually believe that the free will he assumes actually exists.
In everyday life, we casually throw around the terms “confidence,” “chance,” and “likely.” We sometimes attach numbers too. We say that an event has a 90% chance of occurring. But, what do we mean by a “90% chance”?
If it was just noise, you may not hear that any time soon from the textbook mill.
(I think we’ve corrupted KF’s thread long enough.) The entire problem of mind/matter dualism is rooted in a single error of thought: the reification of an abstract descriptive model of experience into an causal agency independent of the mind that conceives it and the mental experience it is extrapolated from. It is similar to the Read More…
Sheldon: My objection, which I will develop in two streams, is that both reductionism and emergence are just wrong, as is the philosophical denial of free will based on them.
George Musser, a science writer reviewing a new book on the subject, thinks it will force free will skeptics to become more sophisticated in their arguments
It really is quite funny. And physicists should stick to physics.
That would appear to make transhumanism an enemy of free will and of freedom generally. But give them credit for being honest about it.
Does “alien hand syndrome mean that we don’t really have free will? Neurosurgeon Michael Egnor discusses
Michael Egnor: Determinism at the quantum level is not true. Nature is not deterministic.
A gamer looks at Detroit: Becoming Human where, of course, you can choose what happens.
Coyne has good taste in archenemies. It shouldn’t go unrewarded.
Computer engineering prof Robert J. Marks, first author of Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics, explains, When I was boy, my father explained free will and predestination to me: I dig a fence post hole. · Did I create the hole because of my own free will? · Or was the hole already there and I simply Read More…
A philosopher claims that neuroscience has proven thoughts do not exist. Eric Holloway looks at the neuroscience and examines the claim: There is a problem with this sort of reasoning. One could make the same argument about computer code, as follows: There is no code. It’s all just assembly language. Or, there is no assembly, it’s all Read More…
Possibly. They certainly rule out experimenter interference: Quantum particles appear to behave randomly when measured. But what if there is no free will? In that case, the physicists were fated, so to speak, to set up the experiment to achieve a certain set of results which might appear to them to be random. But that Read More…