Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Fancy that! An edition of Darwin’s Origin of Species with a worldview guide

What a good idea! Instead of getting shouted down by Darwinians, anxious to impose the “red in tooth and claw” on school curricula, perhaps we should long ago have adopted the practice of simply providing editions of Darwin’s works, detailing the worldview that lies behind this stuff. Accept or reject it, the worldview goes along with the package. Read More ›

Researchers: Dogs co-operate as well as wolves

“The researchers point out that, although the kind of coordination shown in the present study may rely on more simple mechanisms than full, conscious cooperation, … ” Surely no one thinks that dogs or wolves have a theory of co-operation? Read More ›

Consciousness researcher explains his doubts re conscious machines

But first, wait a minute.We do not really know what consciousness is. That is true whether or not “our intelligence and our experiences are ineluctable consequences of the natural causal powers of our brain, rather than any supernatural ones.” as Christof Koch claims. Read More ›

Correlation and Causation

My favorite statistics joke: Student talking to his friend:  I used to think correlation implied causation. Then I took a statistics class.  Now I don’t. Friend:  Sounds like the class helped you understand that field. Student:  Well, maybe. I was reminded of that joke last night while watching the game between the Seattle Seahawks and the Philadelphia Eagles.  The network posted this statistic:  When two teams both of which have birds as a mascot play, the home team’s record is 10-0.  A stunning statistical proof (well beyond two standard deviations) that home bird teams are far superior to visiting bird teams?  Needless to say that statistic predicted with near perfect accuracy the outcome of the game (not). 

Recognizing Design is to the Engineer, as Seafaring is to the Seaman

by Emily Morales January 5th, 2020 Some months back, Norwegian ship-owner and engineer Einar Johan Rasmussen stirred up some controversy with a 1.6 million dollar contribution to the intelligent design organization BioCosmos.  BioCosmos is calling for a more open debate on the power of materialistic processes in generating a highly ordered and fine-tuned universe, and life itself. As expected, the usual cast of characters expressed their discontent: Martin Jacobsen, theologian at Ansgar Theological College remarked that naturalists are best suited to tell us about nature; and theologians, about God. I think most would concur. Might we further this brilliant line of thinking, acknowledging that engineers (such as Mr. Rasmussen) are supremely qualified to tell us about designed and engineered systems? For more on this story Read More ›

Faith: Even mathematics depends on some unprovable assumptions

Pachón: The result was shattering. Gödel showed the limitations of any formal axiomatic system in modeling basic arithmetic. He showed that no axiomatic system could be complete and consistent at the same time. Read More ›

Is “social justice” destroying objectivity in science?

Prediction: The Darwinists will knuckle to the post-facts, post-objectivity rampage, leaving the non-Darwinists to defend science. This is your monkey brain on survival of the fittest: They will persecute Darwinians who speak out. Read More ›