Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Category

Philosophy

Nathaniel Comfort, fresh off an op-ed in Nature, skewers pop Darwinian Steven Pinker

It’s getting so that Darwinians are being treated like ordinary folk who could actually be wrong about some things. What is the world coming to? Where is Queen Umpadeedle when they need her? Read More ›

In debating Jerry Coyne, Michael Egnor tries philosophy…

Egnor: The Prime Mover argument is the most popular formal argument for the existence of God, and it is often misunderstood and, when understood, often misrepresented. Atheists, in my experience, never get it right. If they did, they wouldn’t be atheists. Read More ›

Rob Sheldon: Why process philosophy won’t rescue naturalism

"Let me repeat. Physics doesn't change. And even when discussing the changes (like an oscillation), the physics of change doesn't change. Somebody is making a serious category error when the physics of change becomes the change of physics." Read More ›

If Darwinian biologist Jerry Coyne hadn’t existed, we would have had to invent him

Michael Egnor: A shimmering example of atheist idiocy (there is no other word for it) is Jerry Coyne’s recent argument, at Why Evolution Is True, against God’s existence in his post on David Attenborough’s agnosticism. Read More ›

New: Another philosopher openly dumps Darwinism, cites its acceptance of deception

Budziszewski is onto something here. In a Darwinian universe, there is no reason not to lie to achieve a survival goal. In the traditional universe, classically assumed to exist by most human civilizations, morality is intrinsic to the nature of the conscious entities of the universe. Read More ›

Natural philosopher insists, science is deeply imaginative

Okay but the multiverse crowd does not lack imagination. Nor do those who have convinced themselves of panpsychism. The thing about imagination in science is that it must be disciplined. If it isn’t, it ends up competing with fiction, without the style. Read More ›