Craig and his critics: Why the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness is more propaganda than science
In my previous post, I wrote about the philosopher and Christian apologist, Professor William Lane Craig, who has been widely criticized for some remarks he made on animal suffering in a debate with the atheist philosopher Dr. Stephen Law, in October 2011. Although Craig made several scientific errors, his key claim that animals do not suffer in the same way that we do is a scientifically defensible one. Surprisingly, it turns out that science is not currently able to demonstrate with even a high degree of probability that animals suffer at all, and I cited various experts in the field of animal consciousness who admitted as much. Consequently any atheist claiming to know that animals suffer will have to appeal Read More ›