Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Forbes: Fine-tuning really is a problem for cosmology, about which nothing can be done

So here’s where it stands: They’re compelled to stumble and make up nonsense and the rest of us are compelled to support them, cheer them on, and accept the dismal outcome, forever if need be. Read More ›

Steve Meyer’s new book: Return of the God Hypothesis

Media personality and author Eric Metaxas interviews philosopher of science Steve Meyer, author of Darwin’s Doubt and Signature in the Cell: According to a nationwide survey, more than two-thirds of atheists and one-third of agnostics believe that “the findings of science make the existence of God less probable,” while nearly half of self-identified theists believe “the findings of science are neutral with regard to the existence of God.” But what if there is another option? What if the discoveries of science actually lend support to belief in God? What’s really interesting is that in an era of elite virtue signals, oblivious to reason, a significant number of people want to know where the evidence points. The vid has gotten nearly Read More ›

Darwinism flunks science criteria, says biomedical engineer

Rob Stadler: When high-confidence evidence is appropriately prioritized over low-confidence evidence, the result is a profound new view of evolution – one that they did not teach you in biology. Read More ›

The continuing war over ancient human longevity

The more data we get about our ancestors, the more it will seem like demographics (except that ancestors can’t vote or butt in). The big one is “average human life span.” Here’s an interesting item from Discover: Old adults were present across all time periods, but were by far most common among remains from European H. sapiens of the past 50,000 years, suggesting more than a 5-fold increase in elderly individuals. Modern humans, by this measure, had many more individuals that went on to reach old age than our evolutionary cousins. A more recent study using this method, compared Stone Age Homo sapiens and Neanderthals to archaeological skeletons from the past 10,000 years as well as historical and ethnographic death Read More ›

Researchers: Microbes “jeopardize” neo-Darwinism (and Jon Bartlett’s response)

Jonathan Bartlett: Note how the fact that mutations are no longer considered "environmentally blind" was thrown in at the end, almost as if they were hoping that reviewers didn't catch it. Read More ›

No, seriously: Physicist longs for explanation of the arrow of time that explains as much as Darwin does

Actually, Darwin and his followers simply imposed a vision on the natural world: In their vision, masses of complex, specified information simply arise naturally in the struggle among life forms, though we have yet to identify a single example. Read More ›