(Reformed) New Scientist 3: The Selfish Gene Is No Longer Cool
Readers may recall that New Scientist published an article three days ago on 13 ways we need to “rethink the theory of nature.” Their Number 3 rethink is … Move Over, Selfish Gene. It’s replaced not just by kin selection now but by cultural group selection. Most of the article is paywalled but here’s the gist of #3: But kin selection cannot explain why humans are so nice to strangers… Some researchers think the solution lies in an idea called cultural group selection. Forget shared genes, they argue: selection can favour cooperative groups if the people within them share enough culture. The idea is controversial because to work it requires that groups remain culturally distinct. As critics point out, people Read More ›
Evolutionary computing cannot produce an AI superintelligence
U-Haul a riot (where, lawless oligarchy is the “natural” state order)
Yes, it seems some connected Alinsky School Community Organiser groups have been videotaped in the act, by independent, viral video journalists. Caught, in the act of unloading telling messages and riot equipment — shields and shield walls are not normal, “peaceful”/lawful protest equipment (and no, shields are not purely defensive) — from a rental truck: Another . . . augmented . . . vid clip allows us to recognise the renter of the truck (black shorts girl), even as longer shields are being handed out: This is of course directly connected to the incident where two police officers were shot by rioters in Louisville. So, we can readily connect riots, red guard cannon fodder cultural revolution activism, the ecosystem of Read More ›
Reformed New Scientist 2: Evolution shows intelligence
Researchers have been confirming quantum entanglement in brain tissue
Rob Sheldon on Darwinism and the problem of why intelligent women marry less intelligent men
At The Scientist: Stuff about Darwinian racism we’ve been saying for years…
(Reformed) New Scientist on the genome: Not destiny
New origin of life theory emphasizes a hostile OOL environment
SwiftKey co-founder: Computers can’t just “evolve” intelligence; cites James Shapiro’s self-organization
Surgisphere scandal results in change in editorial practices at The Lancet
Mathematicians debate the war on math
At New Scientist: We must rethink the (Darwinian) theory of nature
Michael Egnor: Darwinism as Hegel’s philosophy applied to biology
He sees that as a framework for much of the change around us: Nineteenth-century Darwinism was much more than a revolutionary scientific theory. It was hardly a scientific theory in any meaningful sense. Natural selection, as atheist philosopher Jerry Fodor has pointed out, isn’t a meaningful level of scientific explanation. It’s barely more than a tautology. Natural selection is an “empty” theory — “survivors survive” has no genuine explanatory power. As ID pioneer Phillip Johnson observed, Darwinism was really a new philosophical theory. It was the view that there is no teleology — no purpose — inherent to nature. Purpose in biology, Darwin insisted, is an illusion. Differential survival alone can explain “purpose” in nature. Darwin proposed that all of Read More ›