As part of science reform, should peer reviewers be paid?
New Ediacaran fossils, 570-560 mya, make the picture clearer
Karsten Pultz on the recent Behe-Swamidass debate
In the science fraud stakes, Haeckel beats Piltdown …?
Darwin is now blamed for environmental destruction
Our founder Bill Dembski is quitting Twitter, moving over to Parler
At Science News: Top Ten wrong results in science
There’s a new buzz on the block, “social genomics”
Because nature is full of intelligence, the more we learn, even about a worm, the less we “know”
The Privileged Planet, Redux
We’ve all heard about the fine-tuning of physical constants–just change them ever so slightly and a different kind of universe emerges. Then, there’s simply our location in our galaxy that allows us to see outwards to the galaxy itself, and beyond. Now, even the radioactivity in the earth’s core seems to be conducive to life. At Phys.Org there is a press release on this paper (behind paywall). “What they found is that if the radiogenic heating is more than the Earth’s, the planet can’t permanently sustain a dynamo, as Earth has done. That happens because most of the thorium and uranium end up in the mantle, and too much heat in the mantle acts as an insulator, preventing the molten Read More ›
Laszlo Bencze: Karl Popper never really retracted his doubt of Darwin
Did climate change cause the extinction of two hominin species?
The tale of how duckbilled dinosaurs crossed the ocean to Africa
Response to Redwave: Can Mental Reality Theory Reduce Human Suffering?
Redwave posted a question in another thread about whether or not MRT would or could cause less suffering than ERT models, most significantly materialist philosophy. To respond, let’s first identify what exactly we’re talking about recognizes the distinction between MRT actually being true, and those who believe it to be true. Obviously, if MRT is actually true, one can still believe in External Reality Theory (ERT) and materialism. There may be ERTs that cause less or more suffering, depending on their specific qualities, so the specific question is: would belief in the specific MRT I am making the case for likely generate less suffering than a belief in materialism? We must also define “suffering” for this conversation. There are many Read More ›