Intelligent Design

Still in Twitter jail, before we go back to our regular work (It is hard to both work and gather Easter eggs at the same time so… ) Father Of 5-Year-Old Pterodactyl Finds It’s Not Easy To Get Species-Affirming Care In America Bottom Story of the day!: Canadians furious over “Don’t Say Eh” bill. Nothing ever happens in Canada if you don’t count Convoy! If you don’t have to wear a stupid, useless, smelly mask today, thank a Canadian trucker. Chances are, he is rolling up the Alaska Highway and won’t hear you. But never mind. Meanwhile: Here are Woke changes Disney is making to old cartoons. And — remember that English teacher? — Can you name the Christ figure Read More ›

It seems, despite UD’s resources tab, some still struggle to understand ID in the three distinct senses: inference, theory/research programme, movement. Accordingly, let us headline a clarifying note from the current thread on people who doubt, for the record: [KF, 269:] >>. . . first we must mark out a matter of inductive reasoning and epistemology. Observed tested, reliable signs such as FSCO/I [= functionally specific, complex organisation and/or associated information, “fun-skee”] beyond 500 – 1,000 bits point to design as cause for cases we have not observed. This is the design INFERENCE. Note, inference, not movement, not theory. Following the UD Weak Argument Correctives under the Resources tab, we can identify ID Theory as a [small] research programme that Read More ›