Media
Official media story pitches Neanderthal man as not human
Whaa?!! Nature’s Henry Gee goes ballistic on false certainties in science
If we can’t find common ground, at least let’s find charitable ground
Tania Lombrozo has a great piece up at NPR on why, more importantly than common ground, is charitable ground.
Read More ›
A plea for engineers to take back the Internet
Science writer who admits to doubting mindless evolution theories interviewed on CBC
Further to, But David, the New York Times will go under before…
What difference will new mainstream media ownership make for ID?
Columnist at Britain’s Telegraph wants to “fire” Dawkins over his dangerous tweet
Science blogger Jeff Toney wants to know who’s the next great science communicator
When media get hold of the term “evolved” …
Pop science news: Entangled wormholes could unite lovers separated by centuries?
Tech writer says she is a creationist—how long do you give her day job?
Why the decline of mainstream media may be good for ID
Wiki’s F – – on ID, 2: Wiki’s ideologically driven corruption of the definitions of science and its methods
As we continue to mark up the Wiki article on ID, the next thing to notice is how the anonymous contributors have projected unto ID, an accusation of trying to redefine science and its methods in service to supernaturalistic creationism: Intelligent design (ID) is a form of creationism promulgated by the Discovery Institute . . . . Scientific acceptance of Intelligent Design would require redefining science to allow supernatural explanations of observed phenomena, an approach its proponents describe as theistic realism or theistic science. It puts forth a number of arguments in support of the existence of a designer, the most prominent of which are irreducible complexity and specified complexity.[5] The scientific community rejects the extension of science to include Read More ›