Eating meat and early weaning explains humans’ evolutionary success – researchers
Nevermore: Ravens show long term memory for friends and foes
Err Oops, Evolutionists Are Getting Slammed Again With Their Lunacy
One little problem withthat new/old warm little pond idea is that, well, there wouldn’t have been any land, at least any land with sufficient stability, way back in those “primordial” days (remember those colorful evolutionary posters in your second grade with all the lightning, earthquakes and volcanoes going off?) to begin with. And without any land, there’s going to be a little bit of a problem making those warm little ponds—oops I mean “inland geothermal systems”—Darwin and the evolutionists had planned on. The pond idea seemed like a good one because the contents of living cells aren’t anything like those deep sea hydrothermal vents. And as for their ET idea, evolutionists were finally getting tired of all those B-grade movies their Read More ›
From The Best Schools: Jerry Coyne, Holy Warrior, Part II
Fri nite frite: Oscar the Deathcat on YouTube.
Evolutionists Don’t Take Kindly to Criticism
You can’t criticize evolution because that would be against the law. It’s incredible, but evolutionists legislate the truth of their theory. They’ll sue, lie to judges, falsify histories, oppose academic freedom, control funding, blackball skeptics and create laws that not only enforce evolution but outlaw even criticism of their non scientific ideas. If you think any of this is hyperbole, think again. All of this is true. Read more
DNA: More than one percent of Scottish men are direct descendants of the Saharan Berber and Tuareg tribes?
A review materialist pop science writer Jonah Lehrer probably won’t like …
Uncommon Descent Contest: Give Darwinist Jerry Coyne’s atheist crusade/jihad a name
Darwinism v. common sense: Imagining the puddle …
Darwinian racism: The other writer who just got dumped from National Review
You want to start your baby out right … with a Darwinian pediatrician …
All the rage now, we hear. In “Darwin’s Pediatricians” (Evolution News & Views, April 19, 2012), Heather Zeiger observes, New Scientist has an interview with Dr. Paul Turke, a “Darwinian” pediatrician. But it turns out, he doesn’t do anything that’s different from physicians known to the UD News desk who are young Earth creationists or Muslims with no use whatever for Darwin. None of these goals requires a Darwinian perspective, and might actually be contrary to some interpretations of Darwinism. They are derived from the Hippocratic tradition, which pre-dates theistic religions such as Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. However, the Hippocratic tenets are compatible with Christianity and other theistic religions and have been adapted to those traditions. Dr. Turke can, of Read More ›