Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Anti-extinction? Former pet tropical parrots now wild in the United States

How do they survive the cold? “We think they’re basically pre-adapted to survive in cold climates because they build their own nests and they can vary their diets so dramatically across the year,” says Stephen Pruett-Jones, an ecologist at the University of Chicago, who has been studying birds for decades. “They roost in their nest every single night of the year, so the nest is really more like a home to the monk parakeet. And their diet changes completely during the winter to seed in backyard bird feeders.” JILL LANGLOIS, “Former pet parrots breeding and thriving in 23 U.S. states” at National Geographic Okay, not completely wild. But they have prior adaptations to serious sub-zero temperatures. Paper. (paywall) “The primates Read More ›

Researchers: Declining Neanderthal fertility caused extinction, not violence

Demographic decline is insidious because its pace appears slow in human terms (generations) but eventually, a freefall can occur. For example, young Neanderthals would eventually find themselves joining other groups because there aren’t enough other Neanderthals around. And the rest is… 23 and me. Read More ›

Knuckle study might shed light on whether ancient humans walked or swung from trees

They might be onto something. After all, they are looking at a restricted type of evidence that may be abundant enough to enable a reasonable decision about some fossils. A far cry from the hype we so often hear. Read More ›

Researchers: Chimps eating shellfish help explain human evolution

If a minor note about chimpanzee behavior needs to be inflated into a claim about human evolution, that’s most likely because not much is known about human evolution and what is known does not fit the grand narrative. Talk about a fishing expedition! Read More ›

A 1980 N.Y.Times article

Below is a New York Times News Service article that appeared Nov 5, 1980, reporting on a meeting at the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History. The discussion of micro- and macroevolution and of the fossil record almost sounds like something from the Discovery Institute blog, the kind of honest assessment of Darwinism which today could cause a biology teacher to lose his/her job. The Times writer assures us, however, that all of this does not suggest “weakness in the fact of evolution”, only in the “perceived mechanism.” He says it actually “reflects significant progress toward a much deeper understanding of the history of life on Earth,” a statement I would certainly agree with! A photocopy of the article as Read More ›

New Scientist has seen signs of a mirror universe touching our own

Broussard is about to do tests to find out if it is true. That’s fun, of course, but in reality, no one can prove it false and it will therefore always be real when cosmologists need it. It would be still more fun to see Sabine Hossenfelder tackle this one. Read More ›

Science journalist confronts evolutionary theorist with hard questions at his book talk

es, in one phrase, Mazur, author of Darwin Overthrown: Hello Mechanobiology, captures the problem: “he doesn’t define it.” Much Darwinism today survives on the fumes of “evolution” in general. Read More ›