Intelligent Design
Chernobyl didn’t produce new species but it did produce a lot of debate about radiation effects
The Khan Academy markets 1980s Darwinism
At Mind Matters News: The Philosopher’s Zombie Still Walks and Physics Can’t Explain It
Politics has invaded the world of human fossil analysis
Truckers to government: We are not your lab rats any more
At Mind Matters News: The mystery of how newborns know things gets deeper
Templeton tries to wish away fine-tuning of the universe
Excerpt from Richard Weikart’s new book, Darwinian Racism
Whatever Darwin may have been, he was (probably) not a plagiarist
The police swoop in Ottawa: The Constitution? Old news now
The cost of silencing science debate: Subjective science
Isaac Newton’s whole career, we are told, was a pursuit of the divine
L&FP, 51: The fallacy of the false dilemma
A classic rhetorical tactic is to pose a dilemma, an argument where the opponent is presented with alternatives, all bad so forcing him or her to either make a bad choice or back away from the position taken. In a variant, one of the choices is presented as a lesser of evils, which is to be taken even reluctantly. It is a powerful rhetorical strategy, and so it is often posed even when it is unwarranted, which is where fallacious dilemma arguments come from. This post is about that fallacious case, and the following infographic will help: Here, we see how policy proposal or argued position P is presented with a dilemma, Q XOR R — two exclusive, allegedly exhaustive Read More ›